If anyone from the Swamplizard team is following the thread and it hasn't been noticed yet, the swamplizard.io site has been marked as harmful. He is listed on the phishing blocklist (of SEAL, ChainPatrol, or MetaMask) so it is necessary to submit certain requests for a delist.

Hi.

Yes, someone added us to this list for no reason.

https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-phishing-detect/issues/126936

I found this report but the user did not provide any evidence, I think he did it just to damage our reputation as the user seems to have no history or activity.

Since you're already here, what is your attitude in the future regarding the Telegram bot for mixing? I think primarily because of the decision to cooperate with the authorities regarding the sharing of personal data, phone numbers, and IP addresses... For mixer services, this is a big omission.

Hi @examplens, It's always a pleasure to read your comments.

Telegram is a private company and we don't know how it treats the data of users who decide to use its services.

Telegram is a user's choice. Accessing via Bot is just Jambler's option. The user decides how they prefer to do it. If the user wants to know what data Telegram will process, they must ask them.

Since the bot is an option and a choice of the user to use an application from a third-party company, if you don't want to use Telegram, you can always use the website or the .onion mirror.

Also, some users feel comfortable using the bot and the privacy it offers them is enough for them.

Hello, thanks a lot for using swamplizard and for your feedback.

@NotATether

@NotATether: I had the opportunity to try SwampLizard with two addresses yesterday (simple mode), and I've got to say, it was pretty good, but there can be improvements.

Hi @NotATether, Thanks a lot for testing the swamplizard.io mixing process.

@NotATether: *Actually, the two transactions were just two blocks apart. Which is very strange since I was thinking for privacy purposes it would be better to send the second transaction after a few dozen more blocks had been mined. 

It seems to be different for every transaction. In your case it was fast, but sometimes the second transaction is sent after more blocks had been mined. Sometimes hours.


@examplens

@examplens: Nevertheless, I decided to test the mixing process itself on swamplizard.io
So here are my observations

Hi @exanplens, Thank you for using the mixer!

@examplens: The calculator is missing, I would like to know exactly how much Bitcoin I will get back before going to the mix process. I assume that it is difficult to set up a precise calculator due to the random determination of the service fee.

I tried it but I didn't like the result, it needs JS.

@examplens: I would add some suggestions here as well. For example, the "paste" button in the address field. It makes things easier and also reduces the possibility of mistakes. The same thing is with the deposit address, I would add a "copy" button here for the same reasons.

This is something I would like to implement but it is not available if you disable JS. Copy text to clipboard on click needs JS.


@icopress

  @icopress: I confirm. I also made an independent check.

Respuesta: Hi @icopress Thank you for testing Swamplizard and analyzing it with AMLBot. Good score: Low Risk 10% and Blacklist Free

Simple suggestion about design: contrast of fonts is not ideal in dark mode. Make fonts closer to white, or just white.

Hi, thanks for your ideas. Yes, I'm planning to modify the design.

Can't we decide earlier how many inputs we want? I know we can add 2 addresses,  maybe we could add more, one for each transaction,?

Well, It would be nice but i can't modify that part. Anyway, when you use a single address in normal mode, you usually receive it in more than one transaction at different time intervals.

That is one strange choice for naming bitcoin mixer, but it is more important how mixer actually work than domain name.

Hi dkbit98, I agree with you, it's a strange name, I couldn't think of anything better that day. but I found it funny and original and finally I decided to register it.

Before doing any mixing I suggest you should read SwampLizard disclaimer page with terms of use, I don't remember of noticing anything similar on other mixers:

Boilerplate ToS to try to distance themselves from US and EU AML laws. Whir.to does that too, but I don't think these people are actually enforcing any of these restrictions unlike say Ginger Wallet.

Regarding the terms of use, I wrote them taking as a reference the ToS texts of already existing mixers like yomix, thormixer and mixtum. But I plan to rewrite and adjust the text.

swamplizard design is very similar to thormixer.

The only difference in the design is the background color is black rest looks exactly similar to Thormixer. I do like the minimalistic approach and the black background. I had earlier disabled the JS but again enabled it because I like the graphics that should up when the mouse moves on the screen. I then changed the language to Hindi and found the translation to be good. Overall a good design and approach by the team that is behind the mixer.

Hello. yes, I have taken as a reference some parts of thormixer.io and mixer.money like the form and the comparison table, well, and some other things about their HTML and CSS, the part that makes tab changes with CSS instead of JS I learned to do it by studying their code. I hope they don't get angry, I thought their layout was the best and simplest. Thanks and sorry for this.

Does anyone else have this happen when they try to turn off the JS through the button on the top of the page?

Well this is a problem, because it seems that Chrome interprets the change as a threat, I guess because Chrome is not very permissive with the experimental JS options. Other browsers like Firefox are not so restrictive.

The problem is not an error in the JS code, it is a security measure of Chrome since it detects the action of deactivating or activating JS from the web and interprets it as harmful. It does not happen to all Chrome users but even so, I dont like that red notice at all and the only way to avoid it is with a version without JS.

The only option is remove the background selector and the particle effect, and offer by default the version without JS with a black background and without particle effect. What do you think guys? Should I modify it, without JS, background effects… ?