IMF Weighs the Pros and Cons of a Central Bank Digital Currency

[zendicator]

In a recent keynote speech to the London School of Economics, International Monetary Fund (IMF) Deputy Managing Director, Tao Zhang, briefed the positives and negatives of a central bank digital currency (CBDC).

Zhang pointed toward greater efficiency and lower costs associated with a CBDC. “In some countries, the cost of managing cash can be very high on account of geography, and access to the payments system may not be available to the unbanked, rural, or poorer population,” he said in the Feb. 28 speech, which hit the web on March 19.

Zhang hits on other positives
The IMF director touched on increased financial inclusion. “CBDC may provide a public digital means of payment without requiring individuals to hold a bank account,” he said.

Zhang also noted several other benefits of a CBDC, including stability and strengthened monetary policy.

In addition, Zhang said a CBDC could act as a combattant against other digital assets. He said:

“A domestically issued digital currency backed by a trusted government, denominated in the domestic unit of account, may help limit the adoption of privately issued currencies (e.g. stablecoins), which may be difficult to regulate and could pose risks to financial stability and monetary policy transmission.”

The IMF official mentioned the negative side of a CBDC as well
Zhang stressed the importance of a proposed-CBDC’s structure in limiting potential risks.

The director said such an asset could steer customers away from banks, as well as strain central bank balance sheets.

Zhang also included that the central bank could incur risks and expenses from the endeavor. “Offering CBDC could be very costly for central banks, and it could pose risks to their reputations,” he said, adding:

“Offering full-fledged CBDC requires central banks to be active along several steps of the payments value chain, potentially including interfacing with customers, building front-end wallets, picking and maintaining technology, monitoring transactions, and being responsible for AML/CFT issues.”

Zhang added that hacks and other faults could impede such operations, leading to a black mark on the bank’s trustworthiness.

The official mentioned a potential hybrid solution called a synthetic CBDC, or sCBDC. Such an asset would involve collaboration between the central bank and the private sector. “The private sector would issue coins fully backed with central bank reserves, under the supervision of the central bank,” he explained.

CBDCs have been a hot topic for a while now. Sweden started testing a CBDC in February, and several other central banks have discussed the prospect, although not everyone is interested in CBDCs.

Cointelegraph reached out to the IMF for additional details, but received no response as of press time. This article will be updated accordingly should a response come in.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/imf-weighs-the-pros-and-cons-of-a-central-bank-digital-currency

[Fenix]

National stable coins of states should make a significant contribution to the further development of the financial sector. It will also put an end to the dominance of the banking system. People will be able to use national stable coins without having to have a bank account. Banks will need to improve the quality of their services and make them cheaper so that people continue to use them.
At the same time, stable coins of the states will represent serious competition for a decentralized cryptocurrency as a means of payment, since they will certainly be in great demand.