Now I got the main point here, sorry for such a dumb question it was my fault I did not get it first. Well, if that's the case then it would be wrong to say that BTC has set a new ATH even if numbers are telling something else. Well, if that's the case then adding CPI data into your chart would give you a better idea of how much potential BTC has.
It might look funny but I got the main point of the whole post now, and it is really new to me, I do have the idea that inflation eats away the value of every asset, but never imagined the real number would be. CPI data is going to be useful for all of us. But IMO, the price of BTC is influenced by demand and supply, and if people have no idea about CPI data then BTC might take a little longer to reach $77k.
This is also just a new perspective. Normally, the impact of inflation is not factored into price charts because it depends on each country. Even if we take into account inflation in the US, the parameter is only representative, and we cannot get the exact value. I don't really believe in this approach, it's just quite interesting and we can wait to see what happens at $77K in the future.
I know someone who often adds relevant parameters to the Real Chart calculation formula,
Sholi on X. Sometimes I also refer to his comments, it's quite interesting!