Have you ever wondered why blockchains often lack connectivity with one another? While Ethereum and other smart contract platforms address this issue, they introduce new challenges like fragmented user experiences and data.
As much as you can highlight the upsides to a block chain configuration like this you can definitely also highlight the downsides too. Now ethereum you made mention of still has its block chain as a struggling on if you ask me. Firstly take a look at the characteristic fees on Ethereum Blockchain and also the fees on an independent chain like bitcoin's block chain.
Now a network that carries the characteristics that you made mention of actually has a high chance of getting attacked compared to a decentralised network that doesn't allow a branching on its chain or network.
You were actually on point on Ethereum's high transaction fees, which has made a lot of people stop using the platform unlike others. And also talking about security which is the most important part of this space, when connecting multiple blockchains, there's a higher risk of attacks.
But here's the thing: with what i saw in the whitepaper, Analog's technology is designed with security top of mind. They're using a modular approach and industry standards to minimize vulnerabilities. I didn't know much about them to some extent until i checked their X, i got to know about poolX that locking a project like ANLOG can guarantee someone 3 Million ANLOG to share. And also because of ETH's high transaction fee, i just decided to lock it to get more ANLOG at the end of the day i didn't lose.
