she deserves to be punished if she is proven guilty... and actually I am a little sorry, why Bitcoin is involved in the headline... even though the main case is money laundering, while Bitcoin is just a tool that is being misused by these brazen individuals. I see the media today is too biased towards those who have power or money. Some people use the media as a tool to attack or defend, and that obviously really annoys me.
Hmm, I'm not aware of this full story yup but there was a reference on another forum about this case i haven't gone through it completely but yup seems like she's guilty because why anyone would like to reveal his/her identity while holding such immense amount, this case is might be related to money laundering but we cant be sure for anything as I said I haven't studied the case properly.
Anyone if he's a genuine crypto investor he/she must be aware of identity threats, in the market also how can some be imprinted while having such experience in the market to make such a withdrawal move?