What's the biggest airdrop you've ever received?

[pakhitheboss]

I don't think airdrops are as bad as you say. We've seen many huge airdrops from projects like UniSwap, Arbitrum, Optimism, Jupiter, and so on, and many hunters have become wealthy from the rewards for their efforts.

I agree not all airdrops are bad as I have been part of the ICP airdrop which went on for 12 months. Made a good amount of free money for a year which was an incredible experience for me as it was my first airdrop. It all depends on which airdrop you participate and how good the team behind it is. I generally do not go and participate in all airdrops like hunters do what I do is carefully select one or two based on my assessment.

[KryptoBull]

I agree not all airdrops are bad as I have been part of the ICP airdrop which went on for 12 months. Made a good amount of free money for a year which was an incredible experience for me as it was my first airdrop. It all depends on which airdrop you participate and how good the team behind it is. I generally do not go and participate in all airdrops like hunters do what I do is carefully select one or two based on my assessment.

The market always has both good and scam projects. The only issue is choosing the potential projects to support and participate in their airdrops to earn rewards instead of wasting time and effort uselessly. Usually, we can analyze the project ourselves through the team, solution, tokenomics, backing fund or refer to the assessments from professional analysis teams.

Many hunters have become rich or at least have additional capital to invest seriously in the crypto market thanks to good airdrops. This is still a popular way for newcomers to enter this market without facing the risk of losing money, so airdrops can be considered one of the ways to help crypto reach new investors.

[luckyledger]

I agree not all airdrops are bad as I have been part of the ICP airdrop which went on for 12 months. Made a good amount of free money for a year which was an incredible experience for me as it was my first airdrop. It all depends on which airdrop you participate and how good the team behind it is. I generally do not go and participate in all airdrops like hunters do what I do is carefully select one or two based on my assessment.

The market always has both good and scam projects. The only issue is choosing the potential projects to support and participate in their airdrops to earn rewards instead of wasting time and effort uselessly. Usually, we can analyze the project ourselves through the team, solution, tokenomics, backing fund or refer to the assessments from professional analysis teams.

Many hunters have become rich or at least have additional capital to invest seriously in the crypto market thanks to good airdrops. This is still a popular way for newcomers to enter this market without facing the risk of losing money, so airdrops can be considered one of the ways to help crypto reach new investors.

It has become harder to find a good project nowadays, but it's possible nonetheless. By refining the skill of analysis a person can achieve better odds for himself in terms of whether the project would be good with it's community or not, but the risks are still there.

[Cryptsafe]

I don't think airdrops are as bad as you say. We've seen many huge airdrops from projects like UniSwap, Arbitrum, Optimism, Jupiter, and so on, and many hunters have become wealthy from the rewards for their efforts.

I agree not all airdrops are bad as I have been part of the ICP airdrop which went on for 12 months. Made a good amount of free money for a year which was an incredible experience for me as it was my first airdrop. It all depends on which airdrop you participate and how good the team behind it is. I generally do not go and participate in all airdrops like hunters do what I do is carefully select one or two based on my assessment.

Your points are valid here. Taking part in so many airdrops might make one be confused and at the same time make one to not give proper attention and efforts to the one that seems to be more priotised than others.  When you gather lots of things to do, your list becomes so obvious that you would become tired and losing focus. That is what happens when one is engaged in too much activities of that nature.

It is good and advisable to do a proper research and findings on projects which one wants to participate in so that you know and have clues the usefulness or values as the case may be because most of these projects takes time and whenever it happens that way one should be very careful because if not, it might result to a waste of time, efforts and commitment to the project.

[luckyledger]

I don't think airdrops are as bad as you say. We've seen many huge airdrops from projects like UniSwap, Arbitrum, Optimism, Jupiter, and so on, and many hunters have become wealthy from the rewards for their efforts.

I agree not all airdrops are bad as I have been part of the ICP airdrop which went on for 12 months. Made a good amount of free money for a year which was an incredible experience for me as it was my first airdrop. It all depends on which airdrop you participate and how good the team behind it is. I generally do not go and participate in all airdrops like hunters do what I do is carefully select one or two based on my assessment.

Your points are valid here. Taking part in so many airdrops might make one be confused and at the same time make one to not give proper attention and efforts to the one that seems to be more priotised than others.  When you gather lots of things to do, your list becomes so obvious that you would become tired and losing focus. That is what happens when one is engaged in too much activities of that nature.

It is good and advisable to do a proper research and findings on projects which one wants to participate in so that you know and have clues the usefulness or values as the case may be because most of these projects takes time and whenever it happens that way one should be very careful because if not, it might result to a waste of time, efforts and commitment to the project.

These are valid points, but I would add up the diversification of the efforts. It's good to find a good project using your tips and not wasting your time, however, the possibility is still there. By trying to find some more, the odds may turn to your side with bigger chances.

[KryptoBull]

It has become harder to find a good project nowadays, but it's possible nonetheless. By refining the skill of analysis a person can achieve better odds for himself in terms of whether the project would be good with it's community or not, but the risks are still there.

Even for investors who spend money to buy BTC, they still face the risk of loss when the BTC price suddenly drops during negative market events, so hunters need to accept the risk when participating in new projects. Analyzing and filtering projects only helps hunters increase their success rate, they will still have to accept failure in some projects.

I think experts will still have many ways to choose the best projects. Some groups even conduct both fundamental and insider analysis to come up with a group of new and potential airdrop projects, hunters can completely refer to participate.

[0t3p0t]

I don't think airdrops are as bad as you say. We've seen many huge airdrops from projects like UniSwap, Arbitrum, Optimism, Jupiter, and so on, and many hunters have become wealthy from the rewards for their efforts.

I agree not all airdrops are bad as I have been part of the ICP airdrop which went on for 12 months. Made a good amount of free money for a year which was an incredible experience for me as it was my first airdrop. It all depends on which airdrop you participate and how good the team behind it is. I generally do not go and participate in all airdrops like hunters do what I do is carefully select one or two based on my assessment.

Well yeah I believe in what you say manager because I remember you back in the days when I was that active on the other forum. 12 months is quite long for me but that was not that long compared to PI Network which started maybe during pandemic and I do not know if it really will give us good free money and unfortunately I was a bit late on that airdrop so yeah fingers crossed.

[libert19]

I think experts will still have many ways to choose the best projects. Some groups even conduct both fundamental and insider analysis to come up with a group of new and potential airdrop projects, hunters can completely refer to participate.

I'm not fan of any expert analysis and stuff because these so called experts will make money of you sooner or later, you can still use them to stay up-to-date with stuff but do not blindly follow them.

There are lot of airdrop experts found on Twitter/Telegram and they all try to make money of their audience once their userbase is grown enough.

[KryptoBull]

I'm not fan of any expert analysis and stuff because these so called experts will make money of you sooner or later, you can still use them to stay up-to-date with stuff but do not blindly follow them.

There are lot of airdrop experts found on Twitter/Telegram and they all try to make money of their audience once their userbase is grown enough.

I'm also in many groups that analyze new projects and airdrops. These analysts have a lot of experience since 2017, and their fundamental analyses are followed by a large community. Of course, they benefit from these activities: promoting projects, getting referrals from hunters, and receiving additional tokens from the projects.

I know that the market is full of scammers, but not everyone who shares information for free is a scammer. They have large communities, they benefit from those communities, and they will need to protect their reputation to continue to exist and earn more income from the value they create and give to the community.