✅ Coinomize.biz | Bitcoin Mixer | Bitcoin Tumbler | Since 2019 ✴️✴️

[Z-tight]

Coinomize's Animated Avatar Contest:
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=329744

Great initiative and this is surely going to be an interesting contest. The price money is very attractive and it is a good incentive to participate in the contest, thank you Coinomize for organizing this and for always looking for innovative ways to give back to the forum and community.

[Gposas]

Coinomize's Animated Avatar Contest:
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=329744

Interesting, seeing another contest from the Coinomize team. But this one is not as easy as it seems, the prize pool is amazing and ability to submit 3 entries is persuasive.
I think here that the Coinomize team is not just creating a contest but helping users in the forum to improve their designing skill while competing for reward.

Big thanks to the Coinomize team.

[bitterguy28]

Coinomize's Animated Avatar Contest:
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=329744

Interesting, seeing another contest from the Coinomize team. But this one is not as easy as it seems, the prize pool is amazing and ability to submit 3 entries is persuasive.
I think here that the Coinomize team is not just creating a contest but helping users in the forum to improve their designing skill while competing for reward.

Big thanks to the Coinomize team.

coinomize really does seem like a team that goes above and beyond not a lot of teams or competitions would allow for this much number of entries and the prize money is really attractive too so i hope that many members get to participate more than once i think it can even be a challenge because you need to think of three different designs but just as equally astonishing as the other ones

it is also good that they are picking not one, not three but five winners

anyway my question is do the judge pick the winners based on all three entries (should the member maximize the given)? does more entries raise the chances of winning or is quality over quantity more important?

[bhadz]

There is a talk on the other forum that mixers might be back. I am wondering if the team is going to expand back there with their campaign if ever theymos allows the advertisement of coinomize there. But with the news of hackings, the services of anonymity are also targeted by the government due to the usage of theirs. The government only looks at mixers like that and not for ordinary people increasing our privacy.

[Coinomize.biz]

I just noticed that the withdrawal threshold for commissions was reduced to 0.0006 BTC.

Thanks!

I could've sworn that it was briefly 0.006 BTC though, after a long time being at 0.007 BTC.

With pleasure

[Amug123]

Coinomize's Animated Avatar Contest:
https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=329744

Interesting, seeing another contest from the Coinomize team. But this one is not as easy as it seems, the prize pool is amazing and ability to submit 3 entries is persuasive.
I think here that the Coinomize team is not just creating a contest but helping users in the forum to improve their designing skill while competing for reward.

Big thanks to the Coinomize team.

coinomize really does seem like a team that goes above and beyond not a lot of teams or competitions would allow for this much number of entries and the prize money is really attractive too so i hope that many members get to participate more than once i think it can even be a challenge because you need to think of three different designs but just as equally astonishing as the other ones

it is also good that they are picking not one, not three but five winners

anyway my question is do the judge pick the winners based on all three entries (should the member maximize the given)? does more entries raise the chances of winning or is quality over quantity more important?

the judging process might depend on specific rule set by coinomize and I believe it would be quality over quantity and the judges might focus on the overall quality of entry, regardless of the number of submissions. Also i think submitting multiple entry could potentially increase a particithpant's chances of winning, but it's ultimately depends on judging criteria.  If quality is prioritized, focusing on creating exceptional designs might be important than submitting a large number of entries.

[Bobcrypto]

There is a talk on the other forum that mixers might be back. I am wondering if the team is going to expand back there with their campaign if ever theymos allows the advertisement of coinomize there. But with the news of hackings, the services of anonymity are also targeted by the government due to the usage of theirs. The government only looks at mixers like that and not for ordinary people increasing our privacy.

Whatever the situation may be over there can be handle by the Coinomize biz team at the right time, for now, the full activities of the campaign is going smoothly. I also think that Coinomize biz mixer has been well established here, though the future is ahead of us, we just have to keep supporting as usual.
I am very sure that Coinomize biz remains the best ever!

[joniboini]

But with the news of hackings, the services of anonymity are also targeted by the government due to the usage of theirs. The government only looks at mixers like that and not for ordinary people increasing our privacy.

I honestly don't think they differentiate mixers into a group of "good guys" and "bad guys" like that. Based on some articles that they published (the US at least), it's clear they consider a mixer or any privacy tools legal, but the government must have access to the data, or they'll call it illegal, and so on. Obviously, a business will get more scrutiny if it processes a high volume of hacked funds. More marketing definitely increases the chances that bad actors will abuse the service for what they need, so the dev must be careful with that. CMIIW.

[Bobcrypto]

But with the news of hackings, the services of anonymity are also targeted by the government due to the usage of theirs. The government only looks at mixers like that and not for ordinary people increasing our privacy.

I honestly don't think they differentiate mixers into a group of "good guys" and "bad guys" like that. Based on some articles that they published (the US at least), it's clear they consider a mixer or any privacy tools legal, but the government must have access to the data, or they'll call it illegal, and so on. Obviously, a business will get more scrutiny if it processes a high volume of hacked funds. More marketing definitely increases the chances that bad actors will abuse the service for what they need, so the dev must be careful with that. CMIIW.

Government will always have some hidden clauses in their rules especially when it comes to privacy issues that involves money.
Again, the US is the center of attractions to the world, any developments, whether positive or negative, at some times impact the other parts of the world. If mixers are considered legal, to some extent,  as you read on the article, I think that other countries may follow the same process or idea.

In my opinion, the US sets some standard, and as long as the current regime of President Donald Trump remains crypto friendly, we may have lesser regulatory effects on the crypto economy.

[joniboini]

If mixers are considered legal, to some extent,  as you read on the article, I think that other countries may follow the same process or idea.

I also think that's possible, but again, the note is that mixers have to provide data to the government if they don't want to be labelled as illegal, which is a terrible thing to do because it will break any trust to the mixer itself even if they don't do any KYC. I doubt anyone who wants to use a mixer or privacy tools would be comfortable with that. Even if there is no KYC or registration, it can still lead to many issues. Heck, there are many database leaks lately, which show that customer data is targeted by bad actors, too. The government isn't really good with keeping it secure either. CMIIW.

[bitterguy28]

But with the news of hackings, the services of anonymity are also targeted by the government due to the usage of theirs. The government only looks at mixers like that and not for ordinary people increasing our privacy.

I honestly don't think they differentiate mixers into a group of "good guys" and "bad guys" like that. Based on some articles that they published (the US at least), it's clear they consider a mixer or any privacy tools legal, but the government must have access to the data, or they'll call it illegal, and so on. Obviously, a business will get more scrutiny if it processes a high volume of hacked funds. More marketing definitely increases the chances that bad actors will abuse the service for what they need, so the dev must be careful with that. CMIIW.

Government will always have some hidden clauses in their rules especially when it comes to privacy issues that involves money.
Again, the US is the center of attractions to the world, any developments, whether positive or negative, at some times impact the other parts of the world. If mixers are considered legal, to some extent,  as you read on the article, I think that other countries may follow the same process or idea.

In my opinion, the US sets some standard, and as long as the current regime of President Donald Trump remains crypto friendly, we may have lesser regulatory effects on the crypto economy.

usa is a big country no matter how much people are saying that the us dollar is declining it still remains to be a strong currency and they still have a strong economy compared to others so they really do serve as a standard for other countries in a way them accepting crypto made other countries more decisive about crypto either they value usa's actions or they just simply want to compete with usa and want to get ahead of them

anyway about the government having access, i do not know what to feel about that even if we are confident with mixers being clean does that mean that we can give access to government and therefore control? we would essentially be giving up our data either way