Bounty hunters and the investors

[Quantum X]

Guys the very reason why the team of an ICO decided to delay the reward for the bounty hunters is to secure the profit of investors when the token is already listed in exchanges.
As a bounty hunter how you face this type of action?
I think the best solution is be an investor aside from participating in bounty. I have a feeling that if this will be the practice of many bounty hunters we can demand the team to send the reward together with the purchase token and this will be part in their rules. Just a thought.

[therozaq]

Guys the very reason why the team of an ICO decided to delay the reward for the bounty hunters is to secure the profit of investors when the token is already listed in exchanges.
As a bounty hunter how you face this type of action?
I think the best solution is be an investor aside from participating in bounty. I have a feeling that if this will be the practice of many bounty hunters we can demand the team to send the reward together with the purchase token and this will be part in their rules. Just a thought.

Of course, I will be annoyed. But I will wait until the end of project and follow roadmap.

[sibolis]

I think not just to secure the investor profit but to prevent the price go down when it listed because bounty hunters tend to sell their reward tokens once they received it.

[KobbyC]

Yes, that is good to be on both sides. Invest with money and participate in some bounties as well. When you involve your money in ICO's, you can get as high as 100% bonus and as low as 20%. If you have extra time, then go into bounty too to get extra rewards. To me, is investment first and then bounty programs.

[bityndye]

Guys the very reason why the team of an ICO decided to delay the reward for the bounty hunters is to secure the profit of investors when the token is already listed in exchanges.
As a bounty hunter how you face this type of action?
I think the best solution is be an investor aside from participating in bounty. I have a feeling that if this will be the practice of many bounty hunters we can demand the team to send the reward together with the purchase token and this will be part in their rules. Just a thought.

Well, some teams delay the distribution to the bounty participants because they are thinking that the bounty participants are the one dumping the price when in reality, the investors are the one doing it because they are the one holding a large part of the tokens. There may be some fact that bounty hunters sell as well but they shouldn't just blame it all it the hunters. It is just unfortunate sometimes when the coins are receive, the price is already low so it would be good if even if they would just send half of the coins and the other half later on.

[Octoalts]

There is truth in what you say, by giving investors a token first and then new to the bounty hunter is to make investors not disappointed. because they spend money to buy tokens, while we are workers. And sometimes, these prize hunters don't want to be ICO investors, because they think being a bounty hunter is already profitable.

[Jaguar]

Yah. Investors is the first priority than any other. They put money into investment for to support the project. They are worthy to be first to have good in return.

[Bobcrypto]

Yes, but workers are equally important to the project because bounty hunters make the project happen and they deserve their reward too. I know that investors may feel that they are the engine of the project and such desire to get the reward first, but at such case, i think the reward, should be split into two parts as part of the project plan; one part to workers (bounty huntets) the other parts to the direct investors, to be shared after ICO are concluded, and not allowing one party to waiting for another party to be paid. Thank