If I can add to discussion
One needs to define economic growth as it may not be understood in the same way by everyone.
In terms of plain figures, if GDP grows, economy is growing. However, the quality of life may deteriorate.
Or the distribution of wealth will be heavily disproportionate and few will benefit from growth.
Or the distribution may be too equal and noone will benefit from growth.
Classically speaking, economy grows with growth of consumption. And as consumption is sustainable demand that meets productivity you may say that: Economic growth is a function of productivity and consumption. Where productivity is a function of efficiency of labour, capital (resources) , technology (knowledge).
Consumption is a function of education, employment, demand.
I like Keynesian approach that explain economy as a virtuos circle of Consumption — Productivity — Employment and back to Consumption
During economic shocks the circle gets disrupted and that's where employees need new skills to get jobs that meet the needs of production to get salaries they can spend
And production needs to rebuild itself to produce the stuff the market will consume.
Of course, these processes are not simultaneous and the speed of transition often is a key of success.