Shouldn't we stop promoting shit project?

[tonymillions84]

The crypto market does not have platform to showcase quality project. it is all a game of luck. if you are lucky, the project you market make gains and progress. you succeed. but if it failed, you move on. Most shit projects pay hunters while some said quality projects are still owning hunters. 

[Fenix]

I completely agree with you, but unfortunately it is very difficult to understand which bounty company will not pay at the end of the bounty, so you have to try to participate in the bounty companies until the very end and hope that the promised payment will come.

Then there should be a system that project needs to pay first then when the bounty will end then the bounty manager will distribute the token and thread will monitor all this. Any project or bounty manager will violate these rules then the thread will take necessary step for them.

Most likely, this will only happen when states adopt certain rules that will organizationally regulate the activities of new ICO projects. If there are no rules, ICO teams will continue to ignore the interests of bounty hunters and deceive us. Or you need to at least develop certain rules for ICO teams in the forums that provide them with advertising.