First, I must admit that I don't see the need for this much social media. There are already too many of them and they mostly offer the same thing.
I will not go into the details of what is presented here, but what I see is quite centralized, certain users have greater privileges... It looks like a fairly private network.
Also, privacy and social networks do not go together for several reasons. For example, a private network, available only to a certain group of people, is not attractive for anything, not even for advertising, and that is necessary at some point in order to get life. One more thing, SM users want to be seen and this is one of the reasons for using such platforms.
The purpose of the social network is to play test a newfound utilization of Bitcoin. It is not meant to compete with or replace existing social networks. If what we end up trying to prove is a success, other social media outlets (like altcoinstalks for example) can use our model and see success too.
The platform seems centralized because of the word "owner", I've already proposed that we change that word to "administrator".
I will save @Jokers time and remind you of the necessity of adding project URL link
ℹ️ ANN topic should contain link to the web site of a project. Please add that information. Q.10 - Does the project have a website & team? > The coin/token should have a website - with their own domain name .
You need to add some text instead of images to check if they are handled by A.I.
How will all this data be managed via Bitcoin, given the high fees and limited blockchain, is it via a second or third layer?
I did add a project URL, I said in my OP that the club of Redivivus is located on a website called The Elon Report. The domain for that website is elon.report.
Here is a link:
https://elon.report/index.php?/register/Here is a link:
https://elon.report/index.php?/clubs/1-redivivus/As for how everything is going to be possible, I want you to think about freebitco.in for a second. How is it possible that I can win and lose single satoshi's with the way the network is now? It's all a display, of course. That's why the minimum withdraw is 30,000 satoshi's.
In our case, we can make our users balance with us function as a display on the top right of the screen. When someone posts, likes, or does anything to effect the public generation of content in the social network, one satoshi will be deducted from the user.
We are considering using the lightning network somewhere in all of this, as I think with that you are able to manage single satoshi's. There are arguments however that the LN isn't real Bitcoin, so there's that we have to deal with as well. This project is in its earliest of earliest of phases.
We are also considering mechanics that will reward users single satoshi's that can be considered a fair game. For example, if I like a post I will lose a Satoshi. The user whose post I liked will then gain a Satoshi.
We are also considering adding ways for users to earn satoshis so they can use it to contribute to the public content of the social network. One of these ways is going to be a mini game built into the club itself that rewards the top (x) players satoshi's at the end of the day/week.
We need to get a userbase going that's interested in the newfound utilization of Bitcoin to begin with. That way, our developers will see reason to code such things.