@Rikafip, when it comes to new users who are not inclined to research what they are buying, it is not so difficult to understand why they choose their devices - but the real enigma is those users who were (and still are) exposed to risk not only from online attacks, but also with regard to public publication of addresses and phone numbers and possible physical attacks.
To me, this is just proof that the average user of any hardware wallet does not understand how important it is that other people do not know that he has it, and that the same device cannot in any way communicate with a remote server and share confidential information.