Will you vote for a politician that is running a betting station

[SmartGold01]

There are two compound words there which means a politician and betting company..
Lets deal away with the betting company first, and focused on the political aspect of voting. Before voting any politician I will have to examine him carefully if he is that charitable otherwise I don't see any reason electing someone who can't really hear the cry of the masses. The main reason we have him is to let him here the cry of the masses and fix things that aren't working in the country hence doesn't have that charisma to fix a nation then we shouldn't vote for him because that is our future and we shouldn't jeopardized our future for anything else.

Then back to the betting company, at first betting company doesn't have anything to do with because his company is being managed by professional gambling operation or who keens to know things about gambling than so, electing the owner doesn't really matter except there was a record of ill activity or was seen as a gambling addicts then we say he isn't worthy enough to handle the position of a government officials.

Exactly my thought,  gambling is legal in Nigeria and a politician owning a gambling station doesn't affect his credibility, except he has established cases of gambling addiction. Because you can own an offline casino shop get you ain't a gambler

Sometimes we quickly judge because of the activity we found ourselves and we think so would others behave as well, but one thing we must understand is that, when someone has the credibility to carry out things or performs their duties correctly then I don't see any reason holding things against them. Our country corrupt but even as that we have good leaders as well as good followers but we can't deal away bad leaders and bad followers, this is a general phenomenon and almost the whole countries experiences this as well.

[bitbit97]

I can understand this topic only when speaking about specific countries, where politicians are not allowed to have any business, because their decisions can include getting benefits for their own business. Everything else is ok with me. If a any person is running a legal business and running it fair, why would I have something against that person? If a person can handle two or more things simultaneousy, it is more than ok with me.