I was under the impression that they do take a lot of any entities that might want to partner with them as obviously there are money to be made, so it's a win-win situation for them. And probably they don't see anything wrong with it. Even the Los Angeles Lakers of the NBA have been using their homecourt and be called Crypto.com as far as I know even after the FTX fiasco.
I can see that, but I'm wondering what standard or source they used to decide whether a deal is worth it or not. I doubt they will accept any partnership just because they can make a ton of money from it. But if we assume they do, maybe they do that only if the money is huge to bail them out of any trouble, so who knows.
I also question their management if they ignore the FTX case honestly. Assuming the image of cryptocurrency is publicly not good, wouldn't it be a bad sponsorship worsen their reputation?