Stuck at 2000 activity

[Freemind]

Punishing legit users to try to catch abusers is clearly a bad rule.

Innocent should never be punished when trying to get abusers

Am I a legit user?. Who knows.

You are wrong. No one freezes your activity to remain at 2,000 from the time the account reached that amount. The system is set up that way and it is something that all users who have exceeded that amount of activity have had to go through. The same thing happened to me years ago and shortly after I discovered the reason. It's nothing against you.

[Lucius]

@bitmover, I understand your frustration, although you have to accept that the rules of the game are not always clearly set for the reasons mentioned by the admin and the President. So even though you are asking to find out what exactly is the reason why your activity is frozen, I think that we have already found the reason and that it is about your total time online, which is significantly less than anyone with whom you have compared yourself.

We can conclude that this time is definitely longer than 5 or 7, and we can guess whether it is fixed at 10 (which I doubt) or is variable between 10 and 12. I didn't have my activity frozen at 2000 because I obviously met all the conditions, and I'm sure you will unfreeze your activity soon - for consolation, you're not the only one "stuck" at 2000.

[admin]

I understand the problem you're talking about. Although I think it's wrong to freeze activity for Legendary members (like the bitmover case), and it certainly has no impact on account farmers.

Punishing legit users to try to catch abusers is clearly a bad rule.

Innocent should never be punished when trying to get abusers

who said it is punishment?
this is how the ranking system was conceived, i do not understand all this fuss!

the freeze points apply to everyone
when you teleport you already skip multiple freeze points which make the next freeze point appear harder

[bitmover]

Punishing legit users to try to catch abusers is clearly a bad rule.

Innocent should never be punished when trying to get abusers

Am I a legit user?. Who knows.

I am legit.

Punishing legit users to try to catch abusers is clearly a bad rule.

Innocent should never be punished when trying to get abusers

You are wrong.

Am I wrong to say punshing legit users is a bad rule?

the freeze points apply to everyone
when you teleport you already skip multiple freeze points which make the next freeze point appear harder

This can't be verified, as rules are hidden. But I trust you that it happens to everyone. Anyway, it is a bad rule imo, because I see other people who joined with me, posted less, are way ahead of me... for reasons unknown...

That is fine, i will just ignore that stats as I always had....

We can conclude that this time is definitely longer than 5 or 7, and we can guess whether it is fixed at 10 (which I doubt) or is variable between 10 and 12.

You are just speculating. The rule is hidden, it can be something like using ALT tokens, using search button, whatever..



I know nothing will change, and the community is Ok with those rules as few people are affected. I will close this topic and will not discuss this anymore.

My opinion:
 BAD RULE (whatever that is).
 Should not be hidden (if it was good, it would not be hidden)
 Legit users will get pissed for stupid reason.

[bitmover]

After a few months I decided to disable adblock in this website and then boom: My online time started growing at a much faster rate and I was able to finally unstuck my activity.

No big deal, but this online time is bugged. My suggestion is to disable this secret rule, as it is bugged and unfair (as some users know it and most dont).

At least the online time should count correctly and equally to every user. As it is, people who use adblock are getting their activity blocked.

[admin]

After a few months I decided to disable adblock in this website and then boom: My online time started growing at a much faster rate and I was able to finally unstuck my activity.

No big deal, but this online time is bugged. My suggestion is to disable this secret rule, as it is bugged and unfair (as some users know it and most dont).

At least the online time should count correctly and equally to every user. As it is, people who use adblock are getting their activity blocked.

i don't think adblock should have an influence on online time, i will need to test this

[examplens]

After a few months I decided to disable adblock in this website and then boom: My online time started growing at a much faster rate and I was able to finally unstuck my activity.

No big deal, but this online time is bugged. My suggestion is to disable this secret rule, as it is bugged and unfair (as some users know it and most dont).

At least the online time should count correctly and equally to every user. As it is, people who use adblock are getting their activity blocked.

Congrats! You have to celebrate.
As far as I can see, you have just passed 10 hours, so I would conclude that this is the limit that is required to continue the activity count. If I remember correctly, it was similar to philipma.

[PX-Z]

After a few months I decided to disable adblock in this website and then boom: My online time started growing at a much faster rate and I was able to finally unstuck my activity.

No big deal, but this online time is bugged. My suggestion is to disable this secret rule, as it is bugged and unfair (as some users know it and most dont).

At least the online time should count correctly and equally to every user. As it is, people who use adblock are getting their activity blocked.

i don't think adblock should have an influence on online time, i will need to test this

That's something the admin should checked since most users here uses adblock, even in mobile i'm using brave or sometimes firefox which has default ad blocker then uBlock in desktop.

[bitmover]

That's something the admin should checked since most users here uses adblock, even in mobile i'm using brave or sometimes firefox which has default ad blocker then uBlock in desktop.

Yeah, I just reached 10 days which is quite odd, as I joined very close to you and many other members who have nearly 20 days of online time.

I even noticed that my bot (bitmoverbot) gets online many times a day to scrap data. He has zero online time, which is weird.(and fundamentally wrong)

Comparing to my bot in bitcointalk, which has 5 days of online time.

I have a bot in bitcointalk which does basically the same thing, and it has 5 hours total online time:



And bitmoverbot only has 5 minutes online time.


So yeah, this is most likely a bug, as looks like admin decided to make online time something important to rank up. He probably changed some configurations to make it count time differently than other SMF forums

[PX-Z]

Yeah, I just reached 10 days which is quite odd, as I joined very close to you and many other members who have nearly 20 days of online time.
...
Comparing to my bot in bitcointalk, which has 5 days of online time.

So yeah, this is most likely a bug, as looks like admin decided to make online time something important to rank up. He probably changed some configurations to make it count time differently than other SMF forums

Do you mean the "Total Time Spent Online"? I looked at your stats, and you have higher numbers than me in almost every category except for the number of days spent. The only explanation I can think of is that if the time spent is tracked using JavaScript, its possible that using an ad blocker can affect this number.

[bitmover]

Do you mean the "Total Time Spent Online"? I looked at your stats, and you have higher numbers than me in almost every category except for the number of days spent. The only explanation I can think of is that if the time spent is tracked using JavaScript, its possible that using an ad blocker can affect this number.

Exactly that.

I had 7 days online until November (1 year of forum use), you can see in the first page of the thread.

I disabled the adblock like a month ago and got 2 days really quickly.

That is possible the reason...