Peter Todd: Sorry but I am not Satoshi Nakamoto

[Freemind]

Yes, as much as we want to fine out who Satoshi is, I think it's better to rest the case because it's better that way. There could be implications if he surfaces and that's why it's better for him or they or whatever the pronouns will be.

And the market is just fine without finding out who the real Satoshi.

So why not keep it that way? And let the secret goes down as one of the most enigmatic personality in the last century.

As I said in another post, it is better that Satoshi's identity never be made public, it would be a danger to him (or her, them) and possibly their families. Besides something as obvious as that, I think Satoshi gave us the best gift he could give us, his ideas and dreams. Let Satoshi live his life however he wants. The hundreds of headlines we can read, and all the documentaries we can watch, are nothing more than simple speculations trying to get our attention. Nobody knows who Satoshi is and that's how it should remain, unless Satoshi one day decided otherwise and wanted to make his identity public, although I doubt that will happen.

[Bobcrypto]

It look like the issue of Satoshi Nakamoto identity will generate more discussions in the future, and when there seems a slow down of talks about Satoshi Nakamoto's identity, there are still people out there pointing their arrows to some high profile persons as the Satoshi Nakamoto.

Read here for more details:  https://crypto.news/jack-dorsey-is-satoshi-nakamoto-matthew-sigel-of-vaneck-claims/

I think the identity of the Bitcoin founder should not be an issue, but there are people who just busy for nothing. The identity of Satoshi Nakamoto may be more harmful to the progress of crypto community than good in my opinion.

[Baofeng]

It look like the issue of Satoshi Nakamoto identity will generate more discussions in the future, and when there seems a slow down of talks about Satoshi Nakamoto's identity, there are still people out there pointing their arrows to some high profile persons as the Satoshi Nakamoto.

Read here for more details:  https://crypto.news/jack-dorsey-is-satoshi-nakamoto-matthew-sigel-of-vaneck-claims/

I think the identity of the Bitcoin founder should not be an issue, but there are people who just busy for nothing. The identity of Satoshi Nakamoto may be more harmful to the progress of crypto community than good in my opinion.

I think Bitcoin enthusiast already accepted the fact that Satoshi's identify will not be going to be revealed to us. Although there is a break through in one of the most enigmatic case in history, Jack the Ripper, https://nypost.com/2025/02/15/world-news/jack-the-rippers-identity-revealed-after-dna-breakthrough-historian/

Nevertheless we can't compare it to Satoshi as we don't have the DNA and only digital footprints, but those are even hard to break as Satoshi was really smart to cover his trail up to this point.

[robelneo]

I think the identity of the Bitcoin founder should not be an issue, but there are people who just busy for nothing. The identity of Satoshi Nakamoto may be more harmful to the progress of crypto community than good in my opinion.

It keeps on popping up. There were times it were the hot discussions, but after so many false news stories about the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, people got enough; those impostors couldn't prove that they were the real Nakamoto, its just that some people want to become instant celebrities by falsely claiming they are Nakamoto, but they will eventually get exposed because of false narratives and being unable to move the real Nakamoto's wallet.

[KincaidT]

I think the identity of the Bitcoin founder should not be an issue, but there are people who just busy for nothing. The identity of Satoshi Nakamoto may be more harmful to the progress of crypto community than good in my opinion.

It keeps on popping up. There were times it were the hot discussions, but after so many false news stories about the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, people got enough; those impostors couldn't prove that they were the real Nakamoto, its just that some people want to become instant celebrities by falsely claiming they are Nakamoto, but they will eventually get exposed because of false narratives and being unable to move the real Nakamoto's wallet.

Satoshi staying anonymous is probably the best thing for bitcoin. If their identity were revealed, it could cause distractions, legal issues, or even risks for that person. Bitcoin was built to stand on its own and it is doing just that. Instead of chasing a name, we should focus on how bitcoin is changing the world. In the end, Satoshi's real legacy is the technology not their identity.