Imagine if Satoshi had launched $BABY first and called Bitcoin the sidechain

[MaryEmerald]

That would be a different ball game for the Cryptoverse as we all know it.
Rather than Bitcoin being the main chain, $BABY would be the leading player and Bitcoin would be the secure backbone for the whole network.

It’s a bold thought I know but I have reasons why I believe it might have worked.
$BABY, born out of the Babylon protocol, brings a fresh outlook to Bitcoin’s security.
It gives those holding Bitcoin the opportunity to take part in staking on Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchains without having to transfer their $BTC off the network.
As opposed to Bitcoin being saved or held as a store of value it could be used in new and better ways, thereby making sure other blockchains are safe and intact while still resting on its own.

Bitcoin could’ve been like a secondary chain. A strong and secure background for an entire ecosystem.
This thought shows how $BABY harnesses the unique  security of Bitcoin for the more extensive DeFi space, presenting more real case uses than what we know.
All this is what makes $BABY an interesting token to either trade or hold.

It’s got real case use by bridging Bitcoin’s trusted security with the versatility of PoS, developing a connection between two prominent blockchain ecosystems.
I value Bitcoin’s impact and security and $BABY represents a way to capitalize on that power in fresh, innovative ways. It gives the opportunity for passive income through staking without moving your Bitcoin off its native network.

When you join the $BABY community, you’re digging a completely different way of fusing Bitcoin’s strengths with upcoming blockchain technologies.
As crypto expands, projects like $BABY are included in the future of blockchain, making it an asset to watch and maybe hold.

[Mia Chloe]

That would be a different ball game for the Cryptoverse as we all know it.
Rather than Bitcoin being the main chain, $BABY would be the leading player and Bitcoin would be the secure backbone for the whole network.

To start with that is something that I believe would never be possible. First of all bitcoin has one of the most complex and proper code in terms of blockchain technology and even security of not only coins but also of the network itself.

One thing I think you fail to understand is that satoshi never created bitcoin as a form of scam or hype to generate liquidity for personal uses however it was more like an enthusiastic move and not a profit minded one. I think you are just trying to advertise some token or coin in an odd way.

[Findingnemo]

If that's the case, then crypto won't have lasted this long. The POW is what makes the crypto decentralized and his vision is to bring the decentralized monetary system against the centralized money, which is why Bitcoin became successful in the long run.

So yeah, wake up from being delusional and this baby is not gonna survive for a year...

[SmartGold01]

When you join the $BABY community, you’re digging a completely different way of fusing Bitcoin’s strengths with upcoming blockchain technologies.
As crypto expands, projects like $BABY are included in the future of blockchain, making it an asset to watch and maybe hold.

I don't think so because Bitcoin is entirely a separate chain out of $babay , though whenever market increases it would reflect to other altcoin. Altcoin is never a choice or shouldn't place much priority over it than we does on Bitcoin. For investments it's mostly important to focused on BTC for long term projection than short term while one could go for altcoin for easy and fast profit and could do it within a stipulated period of time.

[TomPluz]

If that's the case, then crypto won't have lasted this long. The POW is what makes the crypto decentralized and his vision is to bring the decentralized monetary system against the centralized money, which is why Bitcoin became successful in the long run. So yeah, wake up from being delusional and this baby is not gonna survive for a year...

While I am recognizing some possible innovations from this $BABY project, I think OP has come beyond what we could accept. Bitcoin in itself is quite strong, solid and will stay as it is into the future even without those platforms offering what they think lacking on the scene. While I am not stopping or criticizing something new and maybe even better, we have to realize that what we are promoting may not even last. I have nothing against this $BABY and I am wishing it well, anyway.

[KryptoBull]

If that's the case, then crypto won't have lasted this long. The POW is what makes the crypto decentralized and his vision is to bring the decentralized monetary system against the centralized money, which is why Bitcoin became successful in the long run.

So yeah, wake up from being delusional and this baby is not gonna survive for a year...

Haha, I totally agree with you! Baby can't be better than Btc, because it's operating based on the value of the Btc network. The opposite assumption wouldn't be correct, even though POS might be appealing, it's not the protocol that creates the decentralized value of a truly valuable asset. Eth is also having issues with decentralization as LSD is making things complicated.

Baby could be a good protocol for BTC to gain more value in the crypto market, however, it shouldn't be seen as a replacement for BTC. In reality, the crypto market is driven by the characteristics of BTC, like the halving; not many people really care about Baby and the BABY token.

[ABCbits]

Despite OP's poor shilling attempt, https://www.bitcoinlayers.org shows Babylon isn't another highly centralized sidechain or alt. L1. Although
1. I find treating Bitcoin as  secondary chain is wrong, when Babylon is the one that reply on Bitcoin network.
2. I don't think $BABY itself is good investment, when it's use case is rather limited.

[bitterguy28]

Baby could be a good protocol for BTC to gain more value in the crypto market, however, it shouldn't be seen as a replacement for BTC. In reality, the crypto market is driven by the characteristics of BTC, like the halving; not many people really care about Baby and the BABY token.

if you ask an average bitcoin investor i do not think a lot of people would know anything about this baby token those who are interested in staking bitcoin are the only ones who would be aware of this but the reality is not a lot of people are aiming to stake let alone stake bitcoin and even if there are people who are hoping to get into staking crypto i do not know if bitcoin would be their first choice

[Trongduy]

Despite OP's poor shilling attempt, https://www.bitcoinlayers.org shows Babylon isn't another highly centralized sidechain or alt. L1. Although
1. I find treating Bitcoin as  secondary chain is wrong, when Babylon is the one that reply on Bitcoin network.
2. I don't think $BABY itself is good investment, when it's use case is rather limited.

I also don't quite get why OP is so bullish on Babylon, maybe he's staking BTC and raking in some serious rewards. Babylon has definitely crushed it by attracting a massive amount of BTC super quickly, which is something not many projects can pull off.

However, getting too hyped up about Babylon might not be the smartest move since it's basically riding on BTC's coattails. Without BTC, Babylon can't really let users stake other assets that are equally trustworthy. So, we don't even need to consider that possibility, Babylon will never outshine BTC in value.

[Stompix]

Imagine you would top drinking Kool-Aid before posting...

Bitcoin could’ve been like a secondary chain. A strong and secure background for an entire ecosystem.

If it weren't for Bitcoin, there wouldn't be any other coin, that said, this gimmick  of a token will probably die as well in a few years, what will be left will be the people that already bought in and lost 50% in less than two weeks.

I also don't quite get why OP is so bullish on Babylon, maybe he's staking BTC and raking in some serious rewards.

Spam for hype? Is that enough of a motive?