Are Bounty Hunters In Danger From SEC?

[arnishad]

Some of the bounty hunters assume therefore, however never everybody.
Before I commit to support some project, I check it terribly rigorously. I don't participate in campaigns of that succes is related to high risk. SEC can tighten the foundations for the promotion of ICO comes in respect to bounty hunters
If I don't have such a desire, i'll ne'er sell tokens that within the future will bring American state profits.

[PRIBO247]

Some of the bounty hunters assume therefore, however never everybody.
Before I commit to support some project, I check it terribly rigorously. I don't participate in campaigns of that succes is related to high risk. SEC can tighten the foundations for the promotion of ICO comes in respect to bounty hunters
If I don't have such a desire, i'll ne'er sell tokens that within the future will bring American state profits.

Lol...the truth of the matter is SEC is not terribly interested in how well you check the project you market after all, they only have your word for it.

[IyemRoker]

I would not care about SEC rules like that, before even the SEC, we could already trade cryptocurrency traders.
If the bounty hunter is suspended, it's fine if I think but just feel if the ICO isn't successful, please blame the SEC. LOL

[LaltctalksL]

Bounty Hunters are much the same as ICO investors, Yes we don't contribute money yet we contribute our time and effort and we bring so much impact to the project. Perhaps ICO's will execute Mandatory KYC on Bounty Hunters too some ICO's presently is as of now doing this with current SEC Regulations.

[akitha]

i think its not about bounty hunters, as long as the project is not under SEC they can't do anything..

[keyz]

I think the bounty hunters play an important role in the success of a project because with the bounty they are working on, investors are interested in joining the ico. there are many projects that fail due to lack of support from investors.

[PreshB]

Well  to  an  extent  if  the  bounty  hunters  are  residing  in   Us  they  may  face  some  danger  or  problem  from  the  Sec,  but  if  you  are  not  in   Us  I  don't  think  Sec   can   touch  you.

[xeroz]

~snip~

I think you shouldn't worry about it. It is still a plan only, don't apply yet. I think they will revise the plan because bounty hunters have given big contribution for the promotion of ICOs till now. And it is undoubted, bounty hunters did quite effective works. Even though there is an issue of fraudulence, the promotion of ICOs still go successfully.   

[Prime]

I think we don't be so afraid with the news. It doesn't apply yet. I believe as long as there are new ICOs, bounty hunters are always needed. Bounty hunters are important parts to make them successful. And it has been proven for years.

[paolobaltimori]

Yes this can be a problem if you live in United States.... however if KYC is not needed there will be no problem at all I think,.

[Speaker]

Yes this can be a problem if you live in United States.... however if KYC is not needed there will be no problem at all I think,.

Yes, only some projects are beginning to implement KYC for bounty hunters.That is, now not the project tokens are charged, but the share in the company. ("Datablockchain"-one of them)

[mentorian]

I think no. Because it's kind of promotion. Maybe campaigns will do KYC for bounties, but for me it's also good. Becasur a lot of fake accounts and people will leave bounty. That means that I'll receive more tokens and will get more profit in a future. For example very good bounty has DexAge. And promissing rewards. So more than sure SEC will not close bounties.