ICO vs IEO.

[diygirl]

~snip~ I think if this trend continues, bounty hunter may be saying good by to ICOs jobs/promotions .

But I still see there are some projects that provide bounty programs even if they do IEOs. I think it is too early we conclude that bounty programs will be over. Personally, I think the bounty programs won't be over with the IEOs.

[Jacky]

IEO is actually not kind of stuff, I think that it is one of the other crowdfunding systems that is now being used for collecting the funds in to raise.
Well, IEO is very interesting because the coins are listed on exchange during the crowdfunding, so it will affect good both for investors and bounty hunters.

[Fenix]

IEO will totally kill bounty hunting jobs as we know it because there will be no need for campaign anymore, ~snip~

I don't think IEO kills bounty hunting. They also still need bounty hunting to spread out the information to all forums. The point is they not only sell their tokens but they also build communities. For sure, they still need many people to join.

So far, I see that there is no definite practice regarding the possibility of having bounty campaigns in IEO projects. Some IEO teams do not provide for them and quickly sell their tokens, others try to keep the old campaign system bounty. It seems to me that the campaign bounty when distributing new tokens need to be saved. So far, only one of the best projects is quickly completing the fundraising campaign, but the bulk of them will still need to advertise their projects, regardless of the format in which they will be conducted.

[Ghozrd]

I saw a lot of new coins that have successfully reached the softcap then they collaborated with one of the exchanges and ran the IEO, I think this is the latest investment we can do by buying new coins that already have good sales at ICO, I pay attention to coins or tokens those who run the IEO have a good future, ICO and IEO have differences, namely the IEO collects funds faster than investors in just seconds while the ICO takes a long time.

[masterrex]

The Initial Coin Offering(ICO) has been in existence for years (as old as crypto), and now, a new stuff called Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) has just come up, making a better room for traders to get more compared to the hunters. Will this be a good one for the bounty hunters or it will not affect anything.

I and other members of the forum will like to hear your ideas. Thanks.

Honestly I participated already with the numerous ICO wayback 2017-2018 respectively But due to my Bad experience in my previous ICO investing journey im getting scam 2 times, thats why im keeping away in ICO at the moment. But I wish to participate in IEO But i was not able to bought tokens, first on Binance, second on Kucoin, all was failed due to large number of participants the tokens was sold like a hotcake.

[Bit]

I saw a lot of new coins that have successfully reached the softcap then they collaborated with one of the exchanges and ran the IEO, ~snip~

I saw they reached more than softcap, most of them could reach hardcap. I ever heard that on Bittrex, all tokens are sold out only in several minutes. It is very surprising and investors seem very enthusiastic to buy. 

[Bobcrypto]

IEO will totally kill bounty hunting jobs as we know it because there will be no need for campaign anymore, ~snip~

I don't think IEO kills bounty hunting. They also still need bounty hunting to spread out the information to all forums. The point is they not only sell their tokens but they also build communities. For sure, they still need many people to join.

Yes, the spreading of information by the community through word from persons or group is vital to the popularity and awareness of these projects. I think as time goe on there may be additional bounty campaign to enhance the IEOs.

[Psynthax]

ICO and IEO is a good way to crowdfund ofcourse, ICO especially is already tested by the whole community since years ago, though the community have the public secret that ICO sometimes is messed up, often leaving their investors in a grey area full of uncertainty. IEO in the other hand is provided by a popular exchange to facilitate any new project that will be coming up with a new idea. By that we could see that IEO could be more legit than ICO itself however there's still some risks involved whether the project will follow the roadmap or delivering what they promise.

However, as you can see it's always better to seek for something with more certainty, with existing product and not just empty handed but with plenty of proof like VEIL and that's why it's my favorite.

VEIL is basically integrating best-in-class anonymity technologies to become the first cryptocurrency that provides uncompromising, always-on privacy. they already have a crystal clear vision and product. Also there's no kind of BS overfunded crowdfunding nor premine and what's even more promising is the fact that it's already traded exchanges with quite of the volume

If I were to choose I'd certainly go with the legit ones instead of putting money into something like IEO and ICO like what most of smart people do, heck even millionaire is putting their money in a project that already starts to surface not just an idea right? so that's my 2 cents I guess that's the best thing I could think.

[tonymillions84]

that is exactly what everyone needs. the scam involved in cryptocurrency was becoming a menace. it was about to drive investors out of this new technology. with IEO, investors are sure that projects will definitely hit exchanges. one good benefits.

[Legio]

IEO is increasingly popular, this method attracts investors because it is safer and has a lower risk of scam compared to ICO. But ICO used to be and more familiar to investors, maybe later there will be a big shift of choice from ICO to IEO.

[shadow.bishop]

I can say IEO took ICO's throne. There are so many IEO will sale next days also.

Upcoming IEOs in April 2019. Detail ;"https://icodrops.com/category/upcoming-ico/"

[Rafiq]

IEO is increasingly popular, this method attracts investors because it is safer and has a lower risk of scam compared to ICO. But ICO used to be and more familiar to investors, maybe later there will be a big shift of choice from ICO to IEO.

I agree with your opinion. Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) is better then Initial Coin Offering (ICO) and it is safety for investors. But I think it is bad for bounty hunters. In future bounty hunters will lose their bounty jobs.

[Leonardo]

IEOs was hot at its early days but it will soon loose its steam. People are greedy. They want 8x or 10x profit. Meanwhile, exchanges can not always cut their flesh to feed the greediness.

[...] But I think it is bad for bounty hunters. In future bounty hunters will lose their bounty jobs.

Not really, there're still good traditional ICOs, it's just they're harder to found. Besides, there're always opportunities for bounty doers, for example IoTeX signature campaign that I'm wearing

[AllSii]

I saw a lot of new coins that have successfully reached the softcap then they collaborated with one of the exchanges and ran the IEO, I think this is the latest investment we can do by buying new coins that already have good sales at ICO, I pay attention to coins or tokens those who run the IEO have a good future, ICO and IEO have differences, namely the IEO collects funds faster than investors in just seconds while the ICO takes a long time.

Besides the fact that IEO attracts investors' money, it allows you to automatically get a listing on the exchange.

[GREENch85]

I heard from several people that it is very difficult to become a lucky person who managed to buy tokens during the IEO. All purchases are made using bots in seconds. Of course we are talking about top projects.