Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed

[ayatoslaw]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

[AMANPURI OFFICIAL INDONESIA]

I also agree, because the HC project is when the market price is very bad, so the current HC does not guarantee that the project is good, just SC I think because maybe the token will be stable because there are not many investors who have bonuses

[zendicator]

I agree. Some of the shit projects are just money grabbers. I remember ontology that only made and airdrop, as of now, they are very successful.

[Cutter Cute]

The ICO project in 2018 made many investors want big profits but many of the projects ended scam, I still believe projects that do not achieve softcap will continue because now I have several coins that do not hold ICO like GENX and this coin already has a list of exchanges namely Tradesatoshi

[dragononcrypto]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

I do like the fair launch approach instead of ICO or premine, such as how Bitcoin or Litecoin started as well as more recently Grin. Though I do like airdropped projects from a premine too. Even if they are usually not that valuable a project, it is very different from overvalued ICOs still.

[jet]

ICO is to gather funds, this is an start-up for the project to launch. there will be huge chance to continue if project have successfully enough funds to run the company. it may not a guarantee forever but it will be a good start of a company having enough funds.

[trauchot]

I completely agree, some companies that reach hardcaps even end up in a scam after a while or simply cannot develop their technologies and their products for various reasons.

[GREENch85]

If the project #DevelopmentTeam  does not need the funds of ordinary people, then maybe they found money elsewhere(for example, investment funds)

[Rituvohra01]

I totally agree with the statement that if a project reach a hard cap is no guarantee that the project will succeed. Project can be scam also.

[Malibu]

They can lie about Hardcap. Many of them hide their accounts. But at the same time, they can just steal the money and throw their project. No matter they assembled a Hardcap or the softcup, the main thing that they do on.

[Thegals]

That is a true statement and has happened several times.  When the end result of ICO sales with hardcap achievement, the price still falls and does not match expectations.  And there are a number of hardcap ICO projects that have not made a listing in the market.

[Stuart]

Its true that an ICO that made its hardcap finds difficulties afterwards with other things. I have seen a lot of projects that had a successful hardcap, but till now has not been listed, which means they are scam, because they have no form of information from the team/projects.

[Ghozrd]

ICO will continue to exist if the developers want to take a better approach with community members, there will be ideas from members who can help and conduct trials of the projects they have.
The achievement of Hardcap is really needed to develop the ICO project, we just take the example of UBEX, BOLTTCOIN which has successfully achieved hardcap and is still developing with their products

[gotbounty]

It is true. The softcap or hardcap won't guarantee the project to succeed in the future. The quality of the team and the product that will have big influences on success. So, that's why we need to be smart to see the potential of a project.

[ayatoslaw]

It is true. The softcap or hardcap won't guarantee the project to succeed in the future. The quality of the team and the product that will have big influences on success. So, that's why we need to be smart to see the potential of a project.

foresight and investment when it is needed to do research properly,
because most people do very little research, and most prefer and follow issues that are developing on the market.
this is a wrong decision in my opinion. because after all we have to know that the issue is built by whales and project owners.