Some Exchanges Kill Token Price

[Cinno3]

I totally agree with you. Listing tokens on some exchanges is likely to kill that token. Again on some exchanges
 Listing has the potential to improve tokens. I think the team should make the right decision.

[Mexite]

I read above all comments but all comments I get only P2Pb2b, vindax, probit, stex, coinsbit and coinsbit sisters concern of whitebit exchanges. Above all exchanges are responsible for killing the projects.

Yeah, thanks for adding to the list. I am cautious about using these trading platforms.

[carcas]

They don't seem to think about the continuity of the project so they do IEO in a market which is actually bad. That's why I always avoid or don't believe in projects that do that because if I invest there I will lose my money

[Alter]

If you know those exchanges kill the price of tokens, then you are better to avoid buying the tokens there. Some exchanges you stated above are not really good exchanges. Besides they killed the prices, basically many tokens listed there are not really good tokens. So, be careful to buy coins there.

[Nestle]

I agree but it's a shame they did something like that. Can you explain some of the reasons they did this? I saw several projects that actually have a good concept and have the potential to be developed but they choose IEO in markets that don't have good ratings.

[UNIVERSE]

It is probably true. But we do not have any proves about it. Additionally, actually, it is not about the exchange that kills certain coin but the coin itself has low trading volume and no progress on it. that is why some coins will be delisted. Additionally if is about the decreasing price in the exchange, it is not because of the exchange itself but more to the market supply and demand.

[sidik7]

add another reason is that tokens have experienced a high decline due to the lack of high demand factors and also inadequate marketing strategies when listing on a market so that the token quite a bit .

[Lorix]

P2pb2b, Coinsbit, Latoken, these three exchanges are not good exchanges. These three are simultaneously inferior. But I don't know about Stex. Because I have never traded on this exchange. Coinsbit, Latoken These two exchanges I have traded. A much higher fee is required here. There are not enough investors. So I think if the projects from these exchanges, then the project can be improved.

[Paglamon]

Binance, Houbi, OkEx, Kucoin, any coin listed on these exchanges, their value increases a lot. More markets tend to increase prices in the long run. So I think the coins or tokens that are listed on these exchanges are gaining popularity in the market.

P2pb2b, Coinsbit, Stex, Latoken, tokens or coins listed on these exchanges may not last long in the market. Although it improves in the first stage, it has no value in the market later.

[H2O]

Binance, Houbi, OkEx, Kucoin etc are very good in the market. Most of the projects listed there increase the level of much more investment. Again, P2pb2b, Coinsbit, Stex, Latoken, if any token is listed in them, it is much more damaged. So I think exchange is very important for any project.

P2Pb2b, coinsbit and probit fucking a shit exchangers in the crypto market. I never trade in above exchanges.

[Quantum X]

You are right. Well, in the first place the team surely knew about it just before they list their altcoins. In that case we can clearly understand how serious they are base on their exchange choice.

[zulfi125]

This depends on the project; it will be good project then will be listed in good exchanges if will be scammer or low-quality project then will be listed in low-rank exchanges, you can see some good project that is listed in low-rank exchanges, but the price is same like in big exchanges.

[juv3ntus1]

I am not agree with you ,i believe the team members of any project are responsable for the token price, if they are deliver what are promise to make then the price will be fine.

[MrSpasybo]

I want to agree with your observation and I think this can really be true though of course we need some good facts to back up this big claim. However, one thing for sure is that big exchanges where there can be real volume of trades and where there are a big number of traders can have a strong impact on a particular token. Now, in many cases, it is not so easy to enter big and popular exchanges, and they can be costing money to do so that is why many projects just settled those exchanges you mention and that can be a fatal mistake because without excitement a token can slowly die. But then again, if a token will not be listed in any exchange after a long wait then the same fate can happen: slow death.

+1 for great idea
We all know that small exchanges often have low transaction volume, which cannot help project tokens reach many users. When the need to buy tokens on an exchange is not great, while the amount of tokens on the market is fixed, it is natural to lose token value. The positive impact of an exchange listing is not enough to hold the token price.
But we also need to have sympathy for the exchanges as well as projects. Exchanges want to be big too, but they do not have enough advertising costs, while projects want to list tokens on major exchanges but they do not have enough money. I don't think we have a complete solution here, small exchanges will always exist because they can meet the needs of small projects.
What we can expect is that the project can issue a product useful to the community that will give the token a real need, not just a tool to trade or hold. Then, even if the token is listed on any exchange, the community will also buy.

[owmivmen]

They are developers or project owners who take too much risk by doing IEO in a market where not too many people use and low volume. The thing that makes a lot of projects lose value after they finish the IEO. I'm more interested in investing if they do IEO in the big market or at least the people who use that market