Report Plagiarism

[dragononcrypto]

User : Bhigdaddyjr
          post history

Russian professional boxer Dmitry Yuryevich Bivol (born December 18, 1990) is the current WBA light heavyweight champion. In the 81 kg weight class, he took home a gold medal from the 2013 World Combat Games as an amateur.[/3] In June of 2024, BoxRec, the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board (TBRB), ESPN, The Ring, and the Boxing Writers Association of America all ranked Bivol as the third best current fighter in the world, pound for pound.* [8] Additionally, The Ring,[9][6], ESPN,[10], TBRB,[11][12], and BoxRec rank him as the second-best light heavyweight.13]

Dmitry Yuryevich Bivol (Russian: Дмитрий Юрьевич Бивол; born 18 December 1990) is a Russian professional boxer who has held the World Boxing Association (WBA) (WBA) light heavyweight title. As an amateur, he won a gold medal at the 2013 World Combat Games in the 81 kg weight category.[3] As of June 2024, Bivol is ranked as the world's third best active boxer, pound for pound, by BoxRec,[4] fourth by the Transnational Boxing Rankings Board (TBRB),[5] sixth by The Ring,[6] seventh by the Boxing Writers Association of America[7] and fourth by ESPN.[8] He is also ranked as the second-ranked best light heavyweight by The Ring,[9][6] ESPN,[10] TBRB[11][12] and BoxRec.[13]

It is possible that this source that I cite is not the direct source from which it is actually paraphrased, but it is clear to anyone who looks at the post that it was copied from somewhere - perhaps the Wiki version in another language.

There are also a few more posts in the Gambling board that have parts of the post copied from other sources, although they are fully or partially put in quotation marks.

+1 have given plagiarism strike and sent warning. Post trashed.

This post: https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=318653.msg1635236#msg1635236
Is also clearly plagiarised from: https://m.aiscore.com/head-to-head/soccer-manchester-united-vs-tottenham-hotspur

I imagine if I searched further I would find more examples but those are enough for a strike.

[Lucius]

@dragononcrypto, thanks for the quick reaction (as always), and for checking additionally - I thought one post was enough. Although if there is one plagiarized post, there is a high probability that there are more.

Strangely, I remember exactly that user when he opened the next topic Ranks and their post, but as things stand, he obviously didn't even read most of the posts because otherwise he would have come to the conclusion that plagiarism is against the rules of the forum.

+1

[dragononcrypto]

@dragononcrypto, thanks for the quick reaction (as always), and for checking additionally - I thought one post was enough.

Because of the 80% rule, I thought it would be best to check for further posts. Even if the blatant citation notes [1], [2], [3], make it obvious it was a re-written copy and paste, that post was borderline 80% plagiarized. Generally it is otherwise correct that one post is enough for a strike, based on previously established mod guidelines at least. I had thought we warned first and striked later but realise this is only for cases were a user may have "forgotten" to add a link, as opposed to blatantly attempting to present plagiarized content as their own such as in replies to topics.

Overall given it only costs $5 to have a single strike removed, giving plagiarism strikes isn't that punishing, especially since even high-ranking members have received them and paid for them to be removed. Ideally the plagiarism penalty (for second offence) would have a higher cost than $10, but usually these users end up with a 3rd strike and posts administrated anyway so kind of irrelevant I guess.

[Legion]

User : Alex077  + post history

Good Poster

[Freemind]

User : Alex077  + post history
Try looking at the history of the posts. Many posts take the entire content from other websites and translate it into Russian language with the same concept.
Very strong evidence
~snip~

The evidence is clear without a doubt.

The user receives a 20% warning for plagiarism. It is the first notice that the user receives, so for now I will not do anything else to see if the user interacts in the forum normally.

Thank you very much for your help Legion.

+4

[Jokers]

User : Alex077  + post history
Try looking at the history of the posts. Many posts take the entire content from other websites and translate it into Russian language with the same concept.
Very strong evidence
~snip~

The evidence is clear without a doubt.

The user receives a 20% warning for plagiarism. It is the first notice that the user receives, so for now I will not do anything else to see if the user interacts in the forum normally.

Thank you very much for your help Legion.

+4

I'd not say that without a doubt. First, he leaves a link to the source each time. And next, I warned him previously that only copying of news is not needed if there's no own comment on the news and as I see he now is not only copying news via translation (with a link to the source), but gives his comment in the end as well.

[Alex077]

User : Alex077  + post history
Try looking at the history of the posts. Many posts take the entire content from other websites and translate it into Russian language with the same concept.
Very strong evidence
~snip~

The evidence is clear without a doubt.

The user receives a 20% warning for plagiarism. It is the first notice that the user receives, so for now I will not do anything else to see if the user interacts in the forum normally.

Thank you very much for your help Legion.

+4

I'd not say that without a doubt. First, he leaves a link to the source each time. And next, I warned him previously that only copying of news is not needed if there's no own comment on the news and as I see he now is not only copying news via translation (with a link to the source), but gives his comment in the end as well.

Yes, everything is correct, after your remark I changed my writing style and began to supplement all translations with my commentary, although translation can in no way be considered plagiarism, it is work and sometimes quite difficult. I have been writing news in various publications for more than 10 years and to be honest I have encountered such requirements for the first time.


The warning has already been removed, the error has been corrected, but at the same time I have already been excluded from the signature campaign for these hasty actions, etc.

Plagiarism is when you copy a text in Russian and transfer it to a Russian-language forum, and the translation of the text is already a work that has never been considered plagiarism, especially with its own comments. This is how all news sites work, it has nothing to do with plagiarism.

[cryptoqueen]

Alex077 has linked the source and commented below.
Then why is it accused of plagiarism?
this is strange and funny.

@Legion just accusing people carelessly, because he probably wants to be a DT Decentralization Team.

@Legion
it's okay to be ambitious, but first understand what plagiarism is.

If you don't understand, you should learn first, don't just accuse which results in Alex077 being removed from the signature campaign, and after Alex077 was removed, why did @Legion apply there.

What's going on?
is there a hidden intention?

[examplens]

Plagiarism is when you copy a text in Russian and transfer it to a Russian-language forum, and the translation of the text is already a work that has never been considered plagiarism, especially with its own comments. This is how all news sites work, it has nothing to do with plagiarism.

Any copy/paste without citing the source is considered plagiarism. It is a kind of theft of digital goods and there is certainly no justification for it.
Otherwise, this is a forum, a place for exchanging opinions and information, it is certainly not welcome when someone conveys someone else's opinion as their own. It is very disappointing that someone does not understand what exactly is the problem here.

Alex077 has linked the source and commented below.
Then why is it accused of plagiarism?
this is strange and funny.

@Legion just accusing people carelessly, because he probably wants to be a DT Decentralization Team.

@Legion
it's okay to be ambitious, but first understand what plagiarism is.

If you don't understand, you should learn first, don't just accuse which results in Alex077 being removed from the signature campaign, and after Alex077 was removed, why did @Legion apply there.

What's going on?
is there a hidden intention?

You spent only 18 minutes on the forum, but you already know who was kicked out of a campaign and who ran in his place.
As far as I know, having alternate accounts on this forum is not allowed. There are some exceptions, but they must be made public. Moderators should probably indicate that this is an alt account, maybe they have a better insight into whose it is.

[Alex077]

Plagiarism is when you copy a text in Russian and transfer it to a Russian-language forum, and the translation of the text is already a work that has never been considered plagiarism, especially with its own comments. This is how all news sites work, it has nothing to do with plagiarism.

Any copy/paste without citing the source is considered plagiarism. It is a kind of theft of digital goods and there is certainly no justification for it.
Otherwise, this is a forum, a place for exchanging opinions and information, it is certainly not welcome when someone conveys someone else's opinion as their own. It is very disappointing that someone does not understand what exactly is the problem here.

Alex077 has linked the source and commented below.
Then why is it accused of plagiarism?
this is strange and funny.

@Legion just accusing people carelessly, because he probably wants to be a DT Decentralization Team.

@Legion
it's okay to be ambitious, but first understand what plagiarism is.

If you don't understand, you should learn first, don't just accuse which results in Alex077 being removed from the signature campaign, and after Alex077 was removed, why did @Legion apply there.

What's going on?
is there a hidden intention?

 All texts contain a link to the source from which the translation was made. I emphasize once again that I have been writing news, technical analysis for more than 10 years, and for fairly well-known sites, and I know the rules. There are links to the source everywhere and there are my own conclusions, and I emphasize once again for those who do not know. Translation of the text has never been plagiarism, unless it is a scientific discovery or a patent.

 And once again, the warning for plagiarism has already been removed, we have sorted it out. But I have already been removed from the signature campaign and I do not see any changes for accepting me back.

[examplens]

And once again, the warning for plagiarism has already been removed, we have sorted it out. But I have already been removed from the signature campaign and I do not see any changes for accepting me back.

The number of slots in all campaigns is limited, several campaigns are currently paused, so there is quite a lot of competition for each place in.
It could be a good lesson for all users to give their best in promoting the brand they represent through a signature campaign.

[DYING_S0UL]

-snip-
 All texts contain a link to the source from which the translation was made. I emphasize once again that I have been writing news, technical analysis for more than 10 years, and for fairly well-known sites, and I know the rules. There are links to the source everywhere and there are my own conclusions, and I emphasize once again for those who do not know. Translation of the text has never been plagiarism, unless it is a scientific discovery or a patent.

Hey mate, did you ran out of things to write? I understand that you are in this line of work. But after checking your writing pattern, it seems like you follow this method all the time. Of course, I couldn't read what you wrote, not sure whether those posts had your own point of view or not! Can't really judge them without knowing the language! But was it really necessary? All of us did posted content with a source link once in our lives, but we don't make it a habit. Maybe once in a week or month or so!

[Alex077]

-snip-
 All texts contain a link to the source from which the translation was made.....

Hey mate, did you ran out of things to write? I understand that you are in this line of work. But after checking your writing pattern, it seems like you follow this method all the time. Of course, I couldn't read what you wrote, not sure whether those posts had your own point of view or not! Can't really judge them without knowing the language! But was it really necessary? All of us did posted content with a source link once in our lives, but we don't make it a habit. Maybe once in a week or month or so!

)))))  I regularly write news on various websites, the news always comes with a link to the original source from which the translation was made, it's very simple, you just need to understand how news and texts are written, they don't come out of your head.... And in order not to make such comments, you should have read the topic from the beginning. It says there that I have been writing cryptocurrency news for various websites for over 10 years, and I do everything according to the rules.

And how can you make comments without understanding what is written there, without understanding the language... ))

[Freemind]

As I spoke to Alex 077 yesterday, it was all my mistake. I take full responsibility and invite the campaign manager to send me a private message in case he need more information on this topic.

My apologies to Alex077 for any potential issues this may have caused.

[Legion]

Well, My big Apologies to Alex077 making an incorrect report, @Alex077 is a great news writer.

@cryptoqueen Thanks for advise. No, i won't be DT Member.