As A Bounty Hunter - Which System Of Payment Do You Prefer, Stakes Or Fixed Amount?

[I-Bit]

stakes system is good but fair system now stakes system not fair they change they reduce they do whatever they want to do 

It means the stake system is not good anymore. I also saw in some bounties the bounty managers or team projects decide to reduce the number of token allocations suddenly. With the stake system, they can do the reduction in token allocation after bounties ended. While with fixed amount, they have no choices to pay the token rewards.

[Alcor]

I know that bounty hunters prefer a fixed amount of payment for their services. This payment system gives more guarantees and is more transparent in the distribution of tokens. However, it ultimately cannot completely satisfy the bounty hunters until the ICO’s activities are regulated and its teams will not write in terms of joining the ICO bounty campaign that they have the right to change any rules in terms of remuneration at any time. This condition is very discriminatory and simply means their permissiveness and in fact enshrines the right to abuse their rights.

[Quart]

The fixed payment is much better for me. I see stake amount has a chance to be manipulated by the bounty manager. While fixed amount seems quite safe and difficult to be manipulated.

[Prime]

Personally, I really like the fixed amount to be gained as the reward of bounty hunting, especially when the rewards are in Bitcoin, ETH, or XRP, or Stellar coins. They will be worthier than waiting for the stakes.