As the topic title, my question is pretty straight which has been in my mind for a while: why have we yet to see a casino start their promotion, whether it's a signature campaign, free raffles, prediction contests, etc?
I can see some ANNs but not from the popular casinos as we do see on bitcointalk, I am sure they will be ready to promote if they are aware of this forum's existence.
Campaign managers may answer this better than anyone but whoever wants to add their points are welcome!

I'm sure that all or most of the casinos that are promoted on BTT know about this forum, because managers must have told them about it and offered their services - but they all obviously currently think that promoting on this forum is not profitable for them.

I sincerely doubt that the problem is money, because casinos have quite a decent profit to be able to finance such things, but considering that the pay rates on this forum are quite low, I wonder how many quality users they would be able to attract. If the casinos decided on the tactics of higher pay rates (similar to BTT), I believe that it would attract quality members and that they would probably get quality campaigns.

It is quite interesting, and I use telegram with a crypto wallet that I have activated.
But the crypto wallet generated on telegram cannot be exported to another crypto wallet and you will also not get a seed phrase.

That means we as wallet owners do not have full access to the wallet and only Telegram knows.
I don't really use it for my main assets, just use it to explore TONS of space and the ecosystem within it with the minimum funds I send to my telegram wallet

This seems to be an even worse option than a regular hot wallet where you can at least make your backup and recover the wallet if something goes wrong. Therefore, I don't see any great danger in someone connecting a chat app with a coin wallet if from time to time they will transfer some smaller value there - but I'm afraid that a lot of users don't understand the concept of custodial vs. non-custodial wallets, and that by using such apps they can live in the delusion that their funds are safe.

My opinion is that such things should not be mixed, but it is up to everyone to choose what to use and in what way.

~snip~
...people should use DAI instead of USDT in my opinion (EU users, be careful USDT will be banned in June for the whole EU).

I didn't know that the EU geniuses would do it, but it has been a big wish of some people from the ECB for years, especially their chief CL, who otherwise has a similar position on cryptocurrencies as, for example, the well-known SEC chairman. Given that I do not use stablecoins, this decision will not affect me, but it is really funny to me that they are fighting in such radical ways against everything they consider a threat to the euro - but they are obviously learning from their political brothers across the big pond.

As things stand, it would be best if the feds confiscate all the coins at some point, after that all the coins will be clean. After their "mixing", there is no need to look into the earlier history of the coin. 

When we look at all the seizures over the years, maybe we could say that those who fight the most against the mixers are actually the biggest "mixers" and turn all the "dirty coins" into clean ones. Of course, they profit by doing so, and in such a way that their fee is only 100%

After the next bull run cycle, the probability of Bitcoin falling below $100k is not inconceivable, but it is unlikely. I'm not sure when BTC will reach $200k-400k, and if I tell my kids that I bought my first BTC below $400, they'll never believe me if they don't see a Porch or a Ferrari in the basement. LOL  My current purse is not enormous, and I feel that BTC is becoming further out of reach with each passing year.
~snip~

I wish you were right, but every big bull run was followed by a correction that turned into a bear market - and from what I remember since 2014 every correction caused a 50%+ price drop, which would mean that even if the next ATH is $200k, we can hardly expect that after the correction the price will remain above $100k.

As for Lambo and other metal beasts, I'm not someone who strives for such things, but I understand that some people have the need to prove something to themselves and others in this way

---

What happened to crypto asset diversification? Where do we draw the line? I have a few Sol shitcoins in my wallet that I purchased at the $18 dip, and I haven't decided whether to get eth just yet; everything is dependent on the Bitcoin price. I imagine eth hitting $10k or more in the next bull market, and owning 2-3 pieces wouldn't be a bad idea unless you know something I don't. Tell me.

Maybe I'm wrong, but our colleague is a long-time miner who probably isn't thrilled that ETH has become a POS coin, but neither are many others. I'm not saying that you still can't make money by investing in it, but maybe some other coins have much greater potential.

It is true that a huge amount of electricity is lost every year and that it is about 50 000 TWh, and that for comparison BTC mining consumes somewhere around 200 TWh, which refutes any crazy claim that Bitcoin can have anything to do with a serious impact on the environment. Therefore, any use of what would otherwise be completely useless has a positive effect on the economy of a country and creates additional value.

There were some stories that "El Loco" is somewhat pro-BTC, but this is the first time I read that something concrete is happening in that direction - although this is not a revolutionary idea that has not been talked about before.

This could be the final time we see Bitcoin below $100k I see a great opportunity for everyone to dive in before price pump. There has been little market action, as practically everyone is waiting for the final dip before the bull run to stack more. I'm still on the bench waiting for the right time to enter the market.

Are you referring to this cycle or in general that it will no longer be possible to buy under $100k? In any case, I believe that regardless of the strength of the bull run, in the end there will still be a correction, and that it will not be less than 50%, which will mean that at some point the price of BTC will again be as it is today (possibly even lower).

As for hesitating and waiting for the "right moment", it is certainly some kind of game or even gambling - because although it is possible that the price will fall even lower, it is also possible that it will not be much lower than the levels we had recently. In addition, a lot of people today are not at all satisfied, even when you tell them that within 1+ years they could earn 100% if they invest in BTC, because they dream of earnings from the past, and today's numbers are missing at least one 0 more that is not at all realistic.

Yes history will repeat itself once again but I think people are afraid of such lower prices and they are selling their coins with loss which also affects the market negatively. If we wait and keep the previous history of halving in mind then we will not be caught in the opposite direction.
~snip~

I don't know what kind of low prices you are talking about considering that 1 BTC is still worth over $60k? About 1 year ago, the value was half as much, and some 18 months ago it was even 4 times less than today. If people failed to profit in all this, I really don't know what their problem is and whether they are perhaps too greedy or misled by various influencers who mostly talk about things they know nothing or very little about...