mixero would just use their own rate for converting.

And display it during the entire swap process.

---

A friendly reminder, May 24 is the last day to give the second price prediction in the Mixero contest. So, one day left

Mixero ADVANCED MODE Bitcoin Mixer Bitcoin Price Prediction - May 2024

The fact that mixers and their representatives will just disappear when they shut down is understandable, but not while you're still in business.

If someone stays in the business, then that is more reason to close all connections with the previous mixer business.
For example, if the Frogmixer owner has ever compromised personal data with this service, even if it was paying for domains via PP or bank card, he will certainly not allow a new business (mixer or something else) to have a connection with it.

The Samurai case is something that is a big warning to everyone, and one of the most obvious reactions is Wasabi's disabling Coinjoin functionality.

Although I would like to know the real reasons for the closure of some mixers (even those that enjoyed a certain reputation), I cannot blame them for leaving without saying goodbye.

The strangest thing is how there is literally no activity from the OP. If they were professional, then they would've came out and at least announced that it would be shutting down. Although it would've been even better if they gave the reason for doing so. Just taking down the website with no comment like some of these other mixers have done comes off as really unprofessional.

From a certain point of view, I understand why they don't respond after the site is shut down, they simply no longer have a reason to be communicative and kind to other users.
Although shutting down the site is still a better way than just letting it go while the hosting and domain last, without any support. Remember whirlwind money, which was active for a long time after the "disappearance" of the owner. It's a real miracle that we haven't had any more serious accusations of problems with that service.

links got abused by forum bots, will see in the future

It's an interesting idea, maybe it should be enabled only by higher-ranked members. Thus, they would avoid the mass creation of accounts for this purpose.

I'm not sure if this is a new feature of MixTum, I thought I knew MixTum has supported it for a long time or maybe I've seen this feature on some Mixer services.

It's not a new feature, I remember it from at least a year ago. I don't know when it has been present, Mixtum has existed since 2018 and there have certainly been a lot of upgrades in the meantime.
It certainly makes Mixtum more unique compared to other competing services.


However, Mixtum has the option of free testing https://mixtum.io/?mix=free
It is possible to mix Bitcoin for testing purposes, commission-free, the amount must be exactly 0.001 BTC
Now is a good time for that, because the network fee is also low 8-11 sat/vB

Samurai and Wasabi have abandoned users in the US crypto market,

Samurai is seized and developers are arrested, while Wasabi disables the Coinjoin feature. They didn't abandon anyone, they were pressured by the US government.

At present, I cannot access joinmarket.net and only receive the message "This account has been suspended". I am not sure what happened to this service

Now it is also unavailable for me, strange. There is another message that the server is overused or the allowed limit has been exceeded. I hope that's the only issue because at some point the site will be available again

Either the domain has been overused, or the reseller ran out of resources.

Mixtum should add more information about fees on Precise Payment Mode page, but I guess it's just their standard fees 4% - 5% + 0.0007 BTC.

Probably 4%-5% + 2x 0.0007 BTC, because there are two deposit addresses in question

This is a new feature that I have never heard of anywhere else.

However,  I don't really get what is really different from adding the payment address as the destination  address in a normal mix. Maybe the change feature? But you could just add a second destination address anyway

The advantage is that one transaction can be in a precise amount, while the rest goes to another address (after service and network fee).

I think it's a great idea! It allows us to pay someone directly while limiting fees (it removes one transaction compared to mixing/receiving of funds + sending to X) and, above all, it prevents the recipient from knowing your BTC address/funds, which I really like, with the certainty that the coins won't be frozen thanks to the way Jambler works. A great way to spend your signature campaign sats if you want to pay for online services, for example

It is certainly a good function, although I did not find anything about how much the fee is in this case. I assume that it is like in the case of sending to two addresses with the choice that in such a transaction we have a "change" address.