Bounty payment or coin listing, which come first?

[gunhell16]

I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks

In the first place Sir, your not the only one who faced that. Even I have a lot of coins that I received from the wallet I used during the time I joined in the bounty campaign most of them until now had no exchange listing updates. Now, regarding your question, ever since I never saw a campaign that they distribute the token at once before you begin to work in the bounty project, for what I understand to your question they must pay the participants before they work or you want to advance the rewards before work, no one will do that. The reality happens is " NO PAIN, NO GAIN" but I agreed that the campaign must list the coin before distribution.

[ryap12]

I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks

In the first place Sir, your not the only one who faced that. Even I have a lot of coins that I received from the wallet I used during the time I joined in the bounty campaign most of them until now had no exchange listing updates. Now, regarding your question, ever since I never saw a campaign that they distribute the token at once before you begin to work in the bounty project, for what I understand to your question they must pay the participants before they work or you want to advance the rewards before work, no one will do that. The reality happens is " NO PAIN, NO GAIN" but I agreed that the campaign must list the coin before distribution.

Did you actually understand what OP posted? I think OP never mentioned that bounty hunters needs to get paid first before doing the bounty. That is stupid. No project would ever do that without any good reason.

I actually do not care if bounty rewards are sent before or after listing because what is more important is that the project is working and alive. If that project continues to develop in a span of 5 years, its token value may already have high liquidity across the crypto markets.

[Master107]

No 100℅ assurance of project success even though it is manage by trusted manager in crypto place. The norms is hunters first joined the bounty campaign with equivalent points according to rank. Payment will be sent according to what promised, however, somehow no payment to be sent because of unexpected uncertainties struck the project which could result to failure.
I think payment first is insane idea, possible hunters will trade tokens then leave the campaign at all. In other hand, what if it is scam? so, the scam project could attract investors and steal money forever. Thanks to hunters who promote shitcoins or scam.
To be honest I didn't encounter such project who do payment first.
The best thing to do which I think It Is A Must is THE PROJECT MUST STAND THEIR WORDS/PROMISE NO MATTER WHAT. In case there's something wrong happen, their responsibility is to be transparent to provide updates to every community. Then they must return investors money if the project failed.

How about bounty hunters?
That's the saddest part for us.
Waste of time, idea, electricity, internet, and opportunity to join other campaign.

[Nostoman]

Most projects fail. If successful, the token does not come to the wallet address. The team token of the bounty project shared. This situation has been going on for a long time. I have complaints about this. Because I've done a lot of bounty. I have many tokens in my wallet. Most tokens have no exchange. If a token is exchanged, he does not raise the fee by selling the token. These issues should be noted by the senior admin. This forum should also be listed in its own token exchange.

[masterrex]

I favour on distribution first before listing because I'm afraid that the team will not pay the bounty participants like what DigitalBits was doing, Its gone and wasted the 3 months of promotion works was vaporized thats why I like what the Bounty Detective team was doing a guaranteed price of payment in escrow so that there will be no problem on bounty payment.

[Hope4life]

It doesn't really matter if the bounty distributed first before listing at exchange or reverse, if the project has strong interest and solid then price will be stable and liquid.

[Bobcrypto]

though which ever way is good, but when considering payment before listing it might affect the stand of the price of the coin because as at that time hunter may want to really dump, more of the coin will be in the market few buyer many seller which may make the price to drop, but when considering payment after listing is good to some extent but preferably because bounty already have ground to sell, and team will have determine price but in some cases do affect the also.
so which ever way, stand to be corrected ooo

Well, you have spoken well but I must emphasis here that hunters are not dumpers. If you read through some of the post reply on this topic, you might had noticed few members comments about early investor stoken sales to gain on the first price of the coin listed on the any exchange . I think they are the first price dumpers, especially if a coin has very attractive price than what they initially bought during ICO/IEO skaes; and not hunters, though both early investor/hunters could also affect coin price on exchange.

[babu10]

I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks

I think if there any specific date for coin listing, there is no problem first or last bounty distribution. Besides this as IEO run in this time maximum projects, tokens now listing before bounty distribution where hunters can easily see the price. If the projects failed token also damage because nobody will come to buy that tokens. So finally commitment is main here.

thanks.

[Lorix]

The cryptocurrency market is rife with fraud. It can be seen that even after bounty in many projects, the project is not successful. ICO or ICO also sells tokens showing fake trends. Then they disappear from the market. I have seen many projects. I have seen many project team members cheat. Especially the advisor does a whole master plan. In that master plan, investors, hunters are attacked. Many bounty have been swept away. A number of bounty hunters have survived.

[Octoalts]

I personally also prefer that Tokens are listed on the stock exchange before the prize tokens for Bounty are distributed.  Because if the token is already listed on the exchange, then we can guess how much estimation of the money we will get. But if the token has been distributed but not also registered in the market it will only be displayed on the wallet.

[Rafiq]

Each bounty project has a roadmap; That roadmap should state when the project will end, when the tokens will be issued to investors and bounty hunters and when the tokens will be listed on the exchanger. I think if the bounty project is successful the token should be quickly listed on any exchange and then given tokens to investors and bounty hunters.

[Prime]

All participants will expect to get the coins/tokens as soon as possible. After that, they will also expect for selling it on exchanges as soon as possible. Now, many projects are IEO so that they already have certain exchanges for selling the tokens. So they must be careful when distributing the rewards to the bounty hunters in  order to decrease the possibilities of dump prices.

[Cryptoz]

Because now is the era of IEO, I think the coins must be listed first on the exchanges. If the coins are already listed on exchanges, it will be safe for bounty hunters to sell their coin reward after distribution day. But if the coins are still not on exchanges, there is a chance for the coin to not listed as in ICO bounty. But yes, please look at whether it is good exchange or bad exchange!

[Leonardo]

I don't think it really matters whether distribution or listing comes first. If the distribution comes first then the project dies, bounty hunters are left with bunch of worthless tokens. If the listing comes first then the project dies too, hunters also get a bunch of craps. Thing that really matters is projects must live well and be well developed. That way you can receive and sell your tokens at anytime without any worry.

[Tanimariya]

After getting a token wallet, I keep monitoring the market all the time. I am waiting for the list to be exchanged. If the project is good then exchange comes. Prices continue to rise and trade. If the project is useless or fake then don't give token. Or token exchange list is not. So I call those tokens fake. But if I accept it in a token wallet, and if it is good, then I sell it.