Bounty payment or coin listing, which come first?

[Bobcrypto]

I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks

[TomPluz]

This initiative and decision belongs to the project team and not to us. I don't see any problem either way because the most important is that the asset can be listed on the exchange ASAP so that bounty hunters can choose to be rewarded. Sad to say, the majority of projects never make it to even 1 exchange.

[MrSpasybo]

I couldn't find a connection between bounty distribution and listing. Bounty distribution is the fulfillment of the project's obligations to its supporters, usually as soon as the bounty campaign & Token-Sale end, and listing on the exchange is their own strategy with the project when team reached an agreement with the exchange.
If you want to get listed tokens, you can participate in bounty campaigns of IEOs, their tokens are listed on the exchange, even have a profile on Coinmarketcap.

[Coin63@]

I think coins listing before bounty payments. If we all get coins or tokens in my wallet by chance team don't list it any exchange. How could we get benefit from the project if it not list in any exchange? I think please list first then you payment Hunters.

[Delgboke]

That should based on what project onwers decision at time they may decide to list before distribute bounty payment so what works perfectly to this project may not be the same with another crypto projects is a matter of choice so there are many other bounty campaign that pay before listing on exchange on the long way the project fail. While other still list before bounty payment so is in two ways.

[Istiak]

I think it because many bounties didn't pay or show many excuses or apply many conditions after listing in any exchange which is not acceptable. This type of work shouldn't be done and that is the reason behind the participant's worry. If they ESCROW that payments then I think hunters will not force about bounty payments.

[Paglamon]

I think the same. Because bounty hunters are tired of doing bounty. Because they don't get any payment. Their token shots remain in the wallet forever. is not listed on the exchange. The team says they have failed. I also gained experience after doing a lot of bounty. Listed tokens are not distributed. So bounty hunters don't get anything. Even after waiting for a long time, distribution is not done. So I think this rule should be changed.

[Andruha1993]

You're right. But it may also be such that the coin is already on the exchange and its price is at the very bottom. And the bounty hunters will make little profit.

[Fenix]

I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks

This does not actually affect the quality of the ICO project or the demand and price of their token. And in fact, and in another case, if the project is fraudulent or useless, then this will not change anything. In the first case, we, as participants in ICO bounty campaigns, receive useless tokens that have no real value. In the second case, we simply will not wait for the tokens to appear on the exchange and do not receive useless tokens.
In addition, if we first wait for the tokens to appear on the exchange, and only then receive tokens in our wallets, then by the time we receive them, they will already fall in price, since early investors will sell them and receive their profit, while lowering by several times and tens or even hundreds of times their original price. Therefore, let them first send us tokens, then we will figure it out ourselves.

[Debasco]

though which ever way is good, but when considering payment before listing it might affect the stand of the price of the coin because as at that time hunter may want to really dump, more of the coin will be in the market few buyer many seller which may make the price to drop, but when considering payment after listing is good to some extent but preferably because bounty already have ground to sell, and team will have determine price but in some cases do affect the also.
so which ever way, stand to be corrected ooo

[alltalk]

Now, many projects use the IEO so that they have already listed their coins on the exchanges. That is why many bounty hunters will choose the projects in IEO than ICO as what happened in past years.
However, about the distribution, it should be scheduled. If they have already announced at first that the reward will be distributed a month after bounty ended, it should be. It is in order to avoid the bounty hunter misunderstanding.

[debra]

I think the best option : the coins must be listed an exchange first, means it is in IEOs. In this way, we are quite secure to have coins to be tradable in the exchanges when they are already distributed. Distribution first is nothing if the coins aren't listed yet.

[@chison]

Nothing should bother a project that has good backing about which comes first. In fact so good projects pay with a stable coin. Project like INJECTIVE PROTOCOL pays in USDT. Injective protocol is a second layer DEX.

[KKH84]

I prefer if the bounty hunter payment is paid from the platform used by the project, I mean if the project uses the Ethereum platform then the payment uses ETH and if using the platform from TRON the bounty hunter will get TRX.  I think it will encourage the bounty hunters and can raise the price of coins.

[Senin]

I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks

It doesn't make much of a difference. If the project is good, then whenever we receive the tokens we earned, they will have a demand and price growth. If the project is useless, then it also does not matter whether we receive its tokens or not.
However, I am somehow safer if I immediately receive the earned tokens into my wallet, after that I can calmly observe the development of the project and the price of its token.