What do you think about coins issued without ICO?

[samanti]

This is a difficult part. The easiest answer: tokens are not a currency. You don’t need to create a Blockchain to issue tokens, which is a must-have for a cryptocurrency, but you use an existing one (usually Ethereum, which was originally created as a platform for smart contracts and evolved to be a currency).

[flyaccount]

Chances are that the coin died because no investor entered. It's possible. But for now the ICO conditions are uncertain and also not as good as last year. I think this will cause the coin to go home by not carrying the ICO. It might be like that, that's all my personal opinion about this.

[WWoF]

If you are talking about producing coins with a strong project without collecting money from people. That might be good. You know we saw polymath. I think they collected some money from capital firms but they didint do any crowdsale and they did airdrop to their subscribers. After that they entered binance community voting and they won. because too many people holding these airdrops and they gave their vote to polymath. That seems legit roadmap to entering binance . I also think coins without any investment good idea. Because you know these days companies try to collect firstly 20 30 million dollar amount which can cover their payments for next 50 year and they are starting to doing their project. But why they wanted money firstly ? they can create their platform and they can do airdrop all of their tokens and if after that platform start to earning money also holder can earn and they can do trade. It seems good for me. But icos want money mate. They will take our all of money and they will feel relax after that.

[ComeBack]

The ICO is really important to some projects who need a huge money to start it. Some project preferred to not have an ICO but they still making some way to earn some funds for their project but lessen risk for a huge dump always happening on some project that has an ICO.

[napster]

I don't know what exactly do you mean by the phrase "Not ICO". If you mean that last minute quit and airdrop, those are the good ones. I can give you an example of Ontology.
On the other hand, the team might start only by bounty like Mainframe, those are good either.

Of course there are some shitty ones, but you should know what you are looking for.

[Crypto Prime]

I think a coin that appears from the results of ico has better prospects than without ico.but we also have to know that it all depends on how the project is, whether it is legit or not. what is certain is that we must be smart in choosing ico to follow.

[Dkingbh]

. I consider it more likely to lose my investment when I work with ICO project.

[daviost]

First it must be the community driven token, it means they give the airdrop to the community and let the community decide their price in the market
Second it must really have some good technology inside so before they launching the ICO, the private investor already give their some investment so they dont need to run an ICO again.

[Deallove9]

Project without ico are much better now that ico, I think very soon everyone will stop buying into ico as the rate in which scam is looming the ico of a thing is at high side which is spoiling the image of this great technology.

[Ghozrd]

I see CryptoSoul is a token issued without ico, even they provide free tokens with more than 5 times airdrop, there are differences between tokens issued without ico and with ico, tokens or coins will quickly develop because they have a large community.
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cryptosoul/

[Thegals]

Actually it's the same between ICO and no. But it is more convincing to use ICO, because the project is done seriously and has great potential to move forward. If those who don't use have a greater risk, it can be lost at any time and left by Dev. All depends on how we react, provided that we already know the risks in the cryptocurrency business.

[Kinal]

If coin are decent they don't need a big promotion for themselves

[FelixArgyleNya]

I wonder is there any difference?
Do they cause more confidence and grow rapidly in price? Or no difference?
Please share your knowledge or opinion.

Well, still don't know enough about ICO, nya?
There is no any differences in price growth
The only question is in their security, nya

[Mbah Jenggot]

Investing in ICO is much more risky than investing in Bitcoin for example.
ICO is a project that can fail for different reasons: weak market, few customers, etc.

If you want to invest in ICO coins you have to check its story and volatility of the coin. You have to do a big research.
So for a novice in crypto it's better to choose something more valuable.

Yes I agree mate. Investing in ICO is more risky than investing in bitcoin. But ICO is more profitable. It is my opinion.

[cukong]

this depends on the perspective of the real people, if a coin is seen as an ICO project then the coin is considered to be really serious in carrying out a project, but if it does not already exist, people will consider it still the initial process, or doubtful in choosing the coin