Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: Bobcrypto on April 26, 2019, 05:32:05 AM
-
Some how, gentle men and Ladies, many of us know that ICOs have been in decline, the Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs) have been gaining a lot of attention recently because of the rise in popularity and the extremely quick salescycles that are reminiscent of ICOs.
The objective of ICOs and IEOs are essentially the same, which is to offer tokens to a large group of investors. An IEO is basically an ICO except that it is launched and managed by an existing exchange instead of the organization that created the token. The exchange holds and sells the token on behalf of the project team. This small change has significant effects on the entire process. Any contrary view? your thoughts.
-
The objective of ICOs and IEOs are essentially the same, which is to offer tokens to a large group of investors.
For ICOs, yes.
For IEOs, not all. Just take a look at Binance and how they are gearing towards favoring bigger investors.
-
IEOs adoption only for bigger projects and maybe in the upcoming months we see IEOs going to fail again or scams starts into IEOs too. Right now Binance enjoying the easy money with IEOs and gearing towards the BNB ATH!!
-
Cryptocurrency is currently experiencing not the best time, and IEO can change things for the better, so many companies understand that IEO is almost 100% success and because of this, IEO is gaining so much popularity.
-
I agree if the IEO is a revolution of the ICO, but there will be a dump when investors buy new tokens or coins on the exchange.
The IEO only takes a few seconds to make a sale and I think the enthusiasm of investors is very good when undergoing the IEO because we often see fake projects which then make many investors lose
-
IEOs adoption only for bigger projects and maybe in the upcoming months we see IEOs going to fail again or scams starts into IEOs too. Right now Binance enjoying the easy money with IEOs and gearing towards the BNB ATH!!
The IEOs may not be for the bigger projects nor investors only, except we are only looking at Binance, kucoin or Houbi exchanges IEOs, but there are smaller exchange IEOs like Latoken exchange IEOs where investors are buying. Checkout Latoken exchanges for many IEOs. Thanks
-
ICO and IEO were born at the same time, but in the past ICO was chosen because it doesn't require a lot of money, only whitepapers and websites are interesting so ICO can run.
while IEO is expensive because it will be done immediately in exchange and risk putting a bad exchange name when it fails.
but now ICO is very thick with what is called fraud which makes many people choose other alternatives, namely the IEO.
The IEO is much safer because those who run it are exchangers, not theirs.
-
I think the IEO is a breakthrough and fast selling of tokens. In addition, many IEOs are now emerging so that the ICO is threatened. I think investors are turning to the IEO, including me.
-
IEOs entrust fundraising to exchanges and allow them to serve as their administrators, meaning that the exchanges must be careful about who they associate with. If an exchange fails to properly vet an IEO and investors are defrauded, the blame will be laid at the feet of the exchange. This makes it less likely that the exchanges will do business with bad actors.
-
Many people say so, IEO is the next of ICO, the crowdfunding system.
IEO has the positive side where it has been listed in certain exchange and can buy or trade directly during the IEO.
However, one to remember, we need to be careful in analyzing whether the trading volume in the IEO is real or fake, and we should know which exchange they are listing, if it is a big exchange, it will be very promising.
-
[...] The exchange holds and sells the token on behalf of the project team. [...]
I don't quite agree here. An IEO's got the guarantee from exchange that it's sold. Meanwhile, buying an ICO, you're always followed by the fear that you'll hold a bunch of worthless tokens if that ICO fails or ICO team take your money and run.
I was so hyped by some of the earliest IEOs though: Celer, Top Network... But after the launch of Matic a few days ago on Binance, my desire on taking part in an IEO has gone. People were too greedy to sell out their tokens. One more reason, you have to hold a specific amount of exchange coins to buy IEOs. And when the an IEO's finished, exchange coins are sold in large scale. It's very tricky to buy and sell exchange coins without being lost.
-
Be careful to view about IEOs. For me, IEOs just give a guarantee for the token sale/crowdfunding with popular exchanges. To invest in a project, we don't only view its softcap/hardacap as the achievement on its token sale/crowdfunding. But more than it, we must analyze the next development or its potential improvement through WP, especially about its MVP, strategy/plans, community support, and its team quality. I think these factors are also crucial to learn deeply. So, never follow IEOs because of FOMO.
-
Currently, Initial Exchange Offerings is a great way to attract investments, which is popular and inspires confidence among investors, because the exchanges carefully select good projects and subsequently list these tokens. In my opinion, the IEO is an excellent alternative to ICO.
-
Currently, Initial Exchange Offerings is a great way to attract investments, which is popular and inspires confidence among investors, because the exchanges carefully select good projects and subsequently list these tokens. In my opinion, the IEO is an excellent alternative to ICO.
IEO is much better alternative of ICO because investors trust on exchanges and project because they know listing will be straight to the exchange after IEO done! but not for bounty hunter its skip hunters work!
-
I think IEO is not an evolution of the ICO but it is a new way in the token sale. There is a new type in the token sale, people call it by IEO. It cooperates with exchanges to make a great token sale.
-
Very good and I support the IEO because the basic IEO is the security of a token.
Excange has been protected with security and it is certain that the IEO also has a high level of security compared to ICO.
-
Initial Exchange Offering: The new replacement for fundraising mechanisms? IEO is the platforms which are intended for crowdfunding for an exchange or multiple exchanges globally. This fundraising event is administered by cryptocurrency exchange on the side of the token issuer.
Get the full details about IEO from icoclone
-
IEO is something new to the crypto world. ICO has long outlived itself and we needed changes, here they are.
-
The initial coin offer on the exchange made investors' interest better at the IEO,when the token was listed on the stock exchange, investors were not worried to ask for an update about the exchange they would include from the coin.
Every month I have seen many projects that are carrying out IEOs and I think the IEO is a good step towards offering initial coins in the crypto exchange
-
Some how, gentle men and Ladies, many of us know that ICOs have been in decline, the Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs) have been gaining a lot of attention recently because of the rise in popularity and the extremely quick salescycles that are reminiscent of ICOs.
The objective of ICOs and IEOs are essentially the same, which is to offer tokens to a large group of investors. An IEO is basically an ICO except that it is launched and managed by an existing exchange instead of the organization that created the token. The exchange holds and sells the token on behalf of the project team. This small change has significant effects on the entire process. Any contrary view? your thoughts.
Well, the IEO provide a safer ground for investors and also help in controlling scams.
One of the major problems with ICOs is SCAM and IEO is here to stop it and provide a safe haven for investors.
-
There is no big differece between IEO and ICO ,IEO´s are not safer.
In some countries there are some higher regualations for ICO´s or ICO´s are even restricted and if you can´t reach it what you can do?Make an IEO,simple.
There i no real protect for investors.
Also,lot of IEO doesn´t even make any private sales,all those coins are belong to few people.That opens the door for huge manipulations,only that few people wins.
Situation for investors keeps the same,no matter if ICO or IEO,good research saves you money.Same for hunters.
I´m staying with Bitcoin and some valuable Altcoins with deep solid ground.Now it´s time to pick up some future Amazons,Google´s or Alibaba´s
-
Currently, Initial Exchange Offerings is a great way to attract investments, which is popular and inspires confidence among investors, because the exchanges carefully select good projects and subsequently list these tokens. In my opinion, the IEO is an excellent alternative to ICO.
IEO is much better alternative of ICO because investors trust on exchanges and project because they know listing will be straight to the exchange after IEO done! but not for bounty hunter its skip hunters work!
I agree with your opinion. I think IEO is best for investors but it is bad for bounty hunters.
-
I think it is another type of token sale, so it is not the evolution of the ICO. I see the different way on token sale there. So, we cannot conclude that it is upgrade type of ICO.
-
I think IEO is not an evolution of the ICO but it is a new way in the token sale. There is a new type in the token sale, people call it by IEO. It cooperates with exchanges to make a great token sale.
Based on what you have said, its actually a form of evolution of ICO since you mentioned its a token sale with partnetship on different exchange. From ICO to IEO they are just the same, since the objective is to raise money and spread awareness to the community about their project.
-
I think IEO is not an evolution of the ICO but it is a new way in the token sale. There is a new type in the token sale, people call it by IEO. It cooperates with exchanges to make a great token sale.
Based on what you have said, its actually a form of evolution of ICO since you mentioned its a token sale with partnetship on different exchange. From ICO to IEO they are just the same, since the objective is to raise money and spread awareness to the community about their project.
Yes they are the same and serves the same purpose to raise more funds and spread awareness to the community. But the assurance in doing an IEO is better than ICO, after the fundraising it will be listed on the exchange right after it.
-
Currently, Initial Exchange Offerings is a great way to attract investments, which is popular and inspires confidence among investors, because the exchanges carefully select good projects and subsequently list these tokens. In my opinion, the IEO is an excellent alternative to ICO.
IEO is much better alternative of ICO because investors trust on exchanges and project because they know listing will be straight to the exchange after IEO done! but not for bounty hunter its skip hunters work!
I agree with your opinion. I think IEO is best for investors but it is bad for bounty hunters.
I couldn't agree more to you Sir. Investors benefits more on IEO because they only have to deal with the exchange directly, as it will offer a wallet service for the token and facilitate trading as well. Bounty hunters definitely have no room in this Offering because the cryptocurrency exchange mostly do the works for the project. It performs many functions including serving as the intermediary, facilitator, manager, marketer, and in return, all these services were paid for by the organization that is launching the IEO.
-
Currently, Initial Exchange Offerings is a great way to attract investments, which is popular and inspires confidence among investors, because the exchanges carefully select good projects and subsequently list these tokens. In my opinion, the IEO is an excellent alternative to ICO.
IEO is much better alternative of ICO because investors trust on exchanges and project because they know listing will be straight to the exchange after IEO done! but not for bounty hunter its skip hunters work!
I agree with your opinion. I think IEO is best for investors but it is bad for bounty hunters.
[...] Bounty hunters definitely have no room in this Offering because the cryptocurrency exchange mostly do the works for the project. It performs many functions including serving as the intermediary, facilitator, manager, marketer, and in return, all these services were paid for by the organization that is launching the IEO.
I think while this is true of the larger exchanges like Binance where there is no bounty, it's not true of the IEOs happening on the smaller exchanges, I can think of a couple at least. If you think about it, there being no bounty for a large IEO isn no different from no bounty from a large/hype ICO either. It's based on how hyped the IEO platorm or project is as to whether there will be a bounty allocation, rather than whether it's an IEO or not, in my opinion.
-
Currently, Initial Exchange Offerings is a great way to attract investments, which is popular and inspires confidence among investors, because the exchanges carefully select good projects and subsequently list these tokens.
Let's see if this hold true after a few months or years. I've had some interactions with some of the IEO investors and what I hear/read is no different from the early days of ICOs.
-
Indeed, the IEO / Initial Exchange Offerings are now hot and many people are enthusiastically. But I am worried about the fate of the bounty hunters later because the IEO will be able to shift the ICO and the role of the bounty hunters will be reduced.
-
it's true with everything you say, that actually between ico and ieo is the same, but I think thato is more promising.