Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum
Crypto Discussion Forum => Cryptocurrency discussions => Topic started by: Bobcrypto on July 29, 2020, 12:21:50 PM
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
-
This initiative and decision belongs to the project team and not to us. I don't see any problem either way because the most important is that the asset can be listed on the exchange ASAP so that bounty hunters can choose to be rewarded. Sad to say, the majority of projects never make it to even 1 exchange.
-
I couldn't find a connection between bounty distribution and listing. Bounty distribution is the fulfillment of the project's obligations to its supporters, usually as soon as the bounty campaign & Token-Sale end, and listing on the exchange is their own strategy with the project when team reached an agreement with the exchange.
If you want to get listed tokens, you can participate in bounty campaigns of IEOs, their tokens are listed on the exchange, even have a profile on Coinmarketcap.
-
I think coins listing before bounty payments. If we all get coins or tokens in my wallet by chance team don't list it any exchange. How could we get benefit from the project if it not list in any exchange? I think please list first then you payment Hunters.
-
That should based on what project onwers decision at time they may decide to list before distribute bounty payment so what works perfectly to this project may not be the same with another crypto projects is a matter of choice so there are many other bounty campaign that pay before listing on exchange on the long way the project fail. While other still list before bounty payment so is in two ways.
-
I think it because many bounties didn't pay or show many excuses or apply many conditions after listing in any exchange which is not acceptable. This type of work shouldn't be done and that is the reason behind the participant's worry. If they ESCROW that payments then I think hunters will not force about bounty payments.
-
I think the same. Because bounty hunters are tired of doing bounty. Because they don't get any payment. Their token shots remain in the wallet forever. is not listed on the exchange. The team says they have failed. I also gained experience after doing a lot of bounty. Listed tokens are not distributed. So bounty hunters don't get anything. Even after waiting for a long time, distribution is not done. So I think this rule should be changed.
-
You're right. But it may also be such that the coin is already on the exchange and its price is at the very bottom. And the bounty hunters will make little profit.
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
This does not actually affect the quality of the ICO project or the demand and price of their token. And in fact, and in another case, if the project is fraudulent or useless, then this will not change anything. In the first case, we, as participants in ICO bounty campaigns, receive useless tokens that have no real value. In the second case, we simply will not wait for the tokens to appear on the exchange and do not receive useless tokens.
In addition, if we first wait for the tokens to appear on the exchange, and only then receive tokens in our wallets, then by the time we receive them, they will already fall in price, since early investors will sell them and receive their profit, while lowering by several times and tens or even hundreds of times their original price. Therefore, let them first send us tokens, then we will figure it out ourselves.
-
though which ever way is good, but when considering payment before listing it might affect the stand of the price of the coin because as at that time hunter may want to really dump, more of the coin will be in the market few buyer many seller which may make the price to drop, but when considering payment after listing is good to some extent but preferably because bounty already have ground to sell, and team will have determine price but in some cases do affect the also.
so which ever way, stand to be corrected ooo
-
Now, many projects use the IEO so that they have already listed their coins on the exchanges. That is why many bounty hunters will choose the projects in IEO than ICO as what happened in past years.
However, about the distribution, it should be scheduled. If they have already announced at first that the reward will be distributed a month after bounty ended, it should be. It is in order to avoid the bounty hunter misunderstanding.
-
I think the best option : the coins must be listed an exchange first, means it is in IEOs. In this way, we are quite secure to have coins to be tradable in the exchanges when they are already distributed. Distribution first is nothing if the coins aren't listed yet.
-
Nothing should bother a project that has good backing about which comes first. In fact so good projects pay with a stable coin. Project like INJECTIVE PROTOCOL pays in USDT. Injective protocol is a second layer DEX.
-
I prefer if the bounty hunter payment is paid from the platform used by the project, I mean if the project uses the Ethereum platform then the payment uses ETH and if using the platform from TRON the bounty hunter will get TRX. I think it will encourage the bounty hunters and can raise the price of coins.
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
It doesn't make much of a difference. If the project is good, then whenever we receive the tokens we earned, they will have a demand and price growth. If the project is useless, then it also does not matter whether we receive its tokens or not.
However, I am somehow safer if I immediately receive the earned tokens into my wallet, after that I can calmly observe the development of the project and the price of its token.
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
In the first place Sir, your not the only one who faced that. Even I have a lot of coins that I received from the wallet I used during the time I joined in the bounty campaign most of them until now had no exchange listing updates. Now, regarding your question, ever since I never saw a campaign that they distribute the token at once before you begin to work in the bounty project, for what I understand to your question they must pay the participants before they work or you want to advance the rewards before work, no one will do that. The reality happens is " NO PAIN, NO GAIN" but I agreed that the campaign must list the coin before distribution.
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
In the first place Sir, your not the only one who faced that. Even I have a lot of coins that I received from the wallet I used during the time I joined in the bounty campaign most of them until now had no exchange listing updates. Now, regarding your question, ever since I never saw a campaign that they distribute the token at once before you begin to work in the bounty project, for what I understand to your question they must pay the participants before they work or you want to advance the rewards before work, no one will do that. The reality happens is " NO PAIN, NO GAIN" but I agreed that the campaign must list the coin before distribution.
Did you actually understand what OP posted? I think OP never mentioned that bounty hunters needs to get paid first before doing the bounty. That is stupid. No project would ever do that without any good reason.
I actually do not care if bounty rewards are sent before or after listing because what is more important is that the project is working and alive. If that project continues to develop in a span of 5 years, its token value may already have high liquidity across the crypto markets.
-
No 100℅ assurance of project success even though it is manage by trusted manager in crypto place. The norms is hunters first joined the bounty campaign with equivalent points according to rank. Payment will be sent according to what promised, however, somehow no payment to be sent because of unexpected uncertainties struck the project which could result to failure.
I think payment first is insane idea, possible hunters will trade tokens then leave the campaign at all. In other hand, what if it is scam? so, the scam project could attract investors and steal money forever. Thanks to hunters who promote shitcoins or scam.
To be honest I didn't encounter such project who do payment first.
The best thing to do which I think It Is A Must is THE PROJECT MUST STAND THEIR WORDS/PROMISE NO MATTER WHAT. In case there's something wrong happen, their responsibility is to be transparent to provide updates to every community. Then they must return investors money if the project failed.
How about bounty hunters?
That's the saddest part for us.
Waste of time, idea, electricity, internet, and opportunity to join other campaign.
-
Most projects fail. If successful, the token does not come to the wallet address. The team token of the bounty project shared. This situation has been going on for a long time. I have complaints about this. Because I've done a lot of bounty. I have many tokens in my wallet. Most tokens have no exchange. If a token is exchanged, he does not raise the fee by selling the token. These issues should be noted by the senior admin. This forum should also be listed in its own token exchange.
-
I favour on distribution first before listing because I'm afraid that the team will not pay the bounty participants like what DigitalBits was doing, Its gone and wasted the 3 months of promotion works was vaporized thats why I like what the Bounty Detective team was doing a guaranteed price of payment in escrow so that there will be no problem on bounty payment.
-
It doesn't really matter if the bounty distributed first before listing at exchange or reverse, if the project has strong interest and solid then price will be stable and liquid.
-
though which ever way is good, but when considering payment before listing it might affect the stand of the price of the coin because as at that time hunter may want to really dump, more of the coin will be in the market few buyer many seller which may make the price to drop, but when considering payment after listing is good to some extent but preferably because bounty already have ground to sell, and team will have determine price but in some cases do affect the also.
so which ever way, stand to be corrected ooo
Well, you have spoken well but I must emphasis here that hunters are not dumpers. If you read through some of the post reply on this topic, you might had noticed few members comments about early investor stoken sales to gain on the first price of the coin listed on the any exchange . I think they are the first price dumpers, especially if a coin has very attractive price than what they initially bought during ICO/IEO skaes; and not hunters, though both early investor/hunters could also affect coin price on exchange.
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
I think if there any specific date for coin listing, there is no problem first or last bounty distribution. Besides this as IEO run in this time maximum projects, tokens now listing before bounty distribution where hunters can easily see the price. If the projects failed token also damage because nobody will come to buy that tokens. So finally commitment is main here.
thanks.
-
The cryptocurrency market is rife with fraud. It can be seen that even after bounty in many projects, the project is not successful. ICO or ICO also sells tokens showing fake trends. Then they disappear from the market. I have seen many projects. I have seen many project team members cheat. Especially the advisor does a whole master plan. In that master plan, investors, hunters are attacked. Many bounty have been swept away. A number of bounty hunters have survived.
-
I personally also prefer that Tokens are listed on the stock exchange before the prize tokens for Bounty are distributed. Because if the token is already listed on the exchange, then we can guess how much estimation of the money we will get. But if the token has been distributed but not also registered in the market it will only be displayed on the wallet.
-
Each bounty project has a roadmap; That roadmap should state when the project will end, when the tokens will be issued to investors and bounty hunters and when the tokens will be listed on the exchanger. I think if the bounty project is successful the token should be quickly listed on any exchange and then given tokens to investors and bounty hunters.
-
All participants will expect to get the coins/tokens as soon as possible. After that, they will also expect for selling it on exchanges as soon as possible. Now, many projects are IEO so that they already have certain exchanges for selling the tokens. So they must be careful when distributing the rewards to the bounty hunters in order to decrease the possibilities of dump prices.
-
Because now is the era of IEO, I think the coins must be listed first on the exchanges. If the coins are already listed on exchanges, it will be safe for bounty hunters to sell their coin reward after distribution day. But if the coins are still not on exchanges, there is a chance for the coin to not listed as in ICO bounty. But yes, please look at whether it is good exchange or bad exchange!
-
I don't think it really matters whether distribution or listing comes first. If the distribution comes first then the project dies, bounty hunters are left with bunch of worthless tokens. If the listing comes first then the project dies too, hunters also get a bunch of craps. Thing that really matters is projects must live well and be well developed. That way you can receive and sell your tokens at anytime without any worry.
-
After getting a token wallet, I keep monitoring the market all the time. I am waiting for the list to be exchanged. If the project is good then exchange comes. Prices continue to rise and trade. If the project is useless or fake then don't give token. Or token exchange list is not. So I call those tokens fake. But if I accept it in a token wallet, and if it is good, then I sell it.
-
I think payment first would be better. That way, you can sell your tokens right after it's listed. To many projects, that point of selling is usually at highest price. After that, prices usually gradually decrease. Some people might say that bounty hunters selling tokens leads to price dump but the number of bounty tokens is too small to cause price dump.
-
I think both have an advantage between traders investors and bounty hunters whatever will be the first thing to do. If exchange, hunters will be excited to receive the reward to sell in the market. If payment, hunters will be excited to list the token in exchange to sell. However, the price will be dependant to market demand.
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
Waiting for a project to get listed before distributing bounty rewards is not a NAD idea but many are just afraid that the tokens may not get to them especially after listing if the project is doing well. Many dev and team are greedy. It is much better to receive the reward before listing.
-
it depends on the decision of the project owner but most cases are coins already listed on the market after the bounty ends then distribution
-
I understand that after the bounty hunters are worried of when they will get the coins. But we have to accept the fact that before we join the campaign we agreed that the payment distribution will comes next after the exchange. meaning there's nothing we can do about it.
-
In my opinion, the Bounty payment must take precedence, because it is their obligation. The issue of tokens listed on the exchange is their business, but it would be better if the tokens are registered immediately after payment is completed.
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
In this regard, I would like to make two points. First, the ICO team must strictly adhere to the terms of joining their bounty campaigns. If the deferral of payments is indicated there, only in this case it can be applied. Second, all participants - investors and bounty hunters - should be on an equal footing. Then why don't investors start paying out the tokens they buy after they go public? Or it is impossible to violate the conditions in relation to investors, and bounty hunters are absolutely powerless, in relation to them it is possible to violate?
-
If I participate in the bounty, I usually participate in the bounty by paying for the coins that have been listed. But sometimes I also bounty with new coins that haven't been listed yet, but I'm sure it will work. What is clear in my opinion, you should really study the project well before deciding to join in a bounty project.
-
Yes, the safest way is choosing the bounty with tradable tokens. But it is not only about listed on an exchange, we must check the daily volume or transactions of the tokens on the exchange. If the volume is too low and seems rarely transactions there, I also consider not join the bounty. There is a chance that we will hold bounty tokens that no one demands to buy on the exchange.
-
Every bounty hunter wants an assurance; a reality assurance and this is why the best assurance a bounty hunter can get is their reward (tokens) in the wallet as soon as the bounty is over. Projects need to stop promising to pay after listing; they should just pay after the bounty ends which is the most honorable way.
Lets not be hypocrites. As for bounty hunters; always dyor
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
I agree with your opinion tho, I also think its better for the coin to be listed on exchanges first before distribution takes place,any distribution before coin listing is not a sign of a good project, I have participated in alot of bounties on bitcointalk and listing always come first before distribution, not the other way round.
-
I think distribution should come as soon as possible so for bounty hunters to sell at good prices than distributing after listing when investors and other traders would have dumped the price to an unrecognizable and unprofitable level
-
IMHO, It is not a problem with me if what was the first thing to be done, whether listing or distribution All I care about is to get paid for my work and they should stick to the promise since the bounty was started, the problem is most of the bounty campaign nowadays are just easily change the rules after the campaign was done for me it was unacceptable and form of cheating in the part of the bounty hunters.
-
Which ever comes first doesn't matter, what Bounty hunter need is patient for the team to fully develop price and the project so that the Bounty token allocation wouldn't necessarily have effect on the price.
But there are many situations where the team may want to play the hunters by not paying and been dishonest with the Bounty payments, that's the sad part been a bounty hunters.
The best thing is to escrow the Bounty payments before promoting any project. Bountydetective has been doing that for long and I like their system.
Trust!!!
-
Useless to pay hunters first before distribution if the success remains uncertain either ways their is risk. It is hurtful moment to expect and gain nothing from wonderful dreams. What matter is the project success, token value, payment sent to hunters, the team remain honest to fulfil their promises.
-
In my opinion the coin must listed in exchange first before to distribute the reward from bounty campaigns so that traders will buy the coin and we can see the price running.
-
Of course, it is best for tokens from bounty company to be paid before listing on cryptocurrency exchange, but each company that making bounty has its own rules and goals for bounty hunters, so nothing depends from bounty hunters.
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
In my opinion, the platform should distribute bounty payments first. So that bounty hunters don't sell their tokens before the coins are listed on the exchange. So there is no significant drop in token prices as a result of the large number of people wanting to convert their tokens to popular cryptocurrencies or fiat.
-
For me, a coin that has been listed in certain exchange is better than not. For what we will expect the token or coin that is not listed yet? That is why we can choose to follow the details because it may be because of the condition where it comes directly. In this case, listed n exchanges and legit distribution are clear enough
-
If we want to get business profit then at first we need to buy or make the product and then sell the product after that we can get the benefit. Here i can relate the issue with the subject. If the coin not listed in any exchange then how can it be possible to get the payment? You are not selling the product how can you get the payment? So i think everyone understand what i am wanted to say.
-
I think we should look at the ICO and IEO patterns. IEOs are being listed and can also be traded alongside, while that of ICO is the one we will have to wait till the finalization and conclusion of the project team and exchanges to be listed. I think this thing between token distribution to hunters and listing of token should be viewed by knowing how the campaign will be like. The time we enjoyed ICO is almost fading out.
-
which ever one comes first should not matter as long as the project have value and prospect. distribution of bounty tokens has nothing to do with listing token in the exchange. looking at the tokenomics of most crypto projects, bounty and airdrops has the lowest share of the total quantity Yet project owners are worried about token distribution to bounty hunters.
-
though any one can come first if the project will surely be listed in an exchange, so to me prefer payment first if the coin will surely be listed, because it has been observed immediately a coin is listed the reward of bounty hunters are always delayed, which does not makes sense sometimes.
-
Coin listing is preferable. The team should endeavor to pay in the first good movement of the coin. It is always difficult when the coin goes down.
-
Coin listing, I do prefer Join bounties which the coins are already listed in some exchanges, so it's more guaranteed I will earn something from it, coins without listing are even riskier.
-
Now, I always join bounties that the tokens are already tradable or listed in exchanges. At least, they have already in the IEO stage, not ICO. We also need to see where they do IEO, make sure that the projects of the bounties provide IEO in good exchanges. If they do IEO in bad exchanges, I think we need to analyze the volume or transaction number daily.
-
Coin listing, I do prefer Join bounties which the coins are already listed in some exchanges, so it's more guaranteed I will earn something from it, coins without listing are even riskier.
The advantage of coin listing first is you can able to track the token price and become excited at the same time it is disadvantage to frustrate yourself when the price dump specially the day of payment. Whatever the method to come first both have a positive impact which drive the interest and boast the community.
-
Of course I expect a bounty payment. then followed by coin listing. therefore the purpose of joining the bounty is to get paid which can then be sold to make money.
-
Coin which is not listed in any exchange is just a false coin. Because it has value in the market. So, payment before listing in exchange is one kind of scamming until it is listed. So, Coin listing should be first and Bounty Payment should be last.
-
Both things are very important to me And the most important thing is to have a good project. You will receive the Bunty Payment only when it expires But there are projects that don't give you tokens in a hurry when they're finished. This should not happen when the bounty ends, the token should be distributed. This is a good thing if the bounty token is already listed.
-
Good to be true. Some will say better to received payment first than coin listing. Other opinions might say better coin listing first before payment
Whatsoever, we have our own opinion towards payment method nor coin listing. What matter is the value of coin when hit exchange and when the token touch your wallet.
-
In my opinion, coins must be registered on the market before the coins or tokens are distributed to Bounty hunters. The reason is so that when we get a token we can immediately sell the token and turn it into money, but it is true that friends said above the most important thing is that the coin or token has value and can make money, which one is more important between payment first or being registered first, is not a problem.
-
I'm going through the same thing as you. That many of the coins I own are not listed on the exchange. For me being listed on the exchange is very important, but it's all a project team decision. If the project has good potential and it's real. I guess by doing the distribution of coins and just listed on the exchange at the end, I guess it doesn't matter and will give us an advantage.
But a lot of coins are fake and they certainly wouldn't think to be listed on the exchange and the coins we get don't mean anything.
So my conclusion is that the coins are distributed first or the coins are listed on the exchange first. For me, it's the same and most importantly the project has great potential to continue to grow and be real. And they certainly already have a timetable to be listed on the exchange and that they can do with reality.
-
If one coin is registered or not, I think it is better if the prize is distributed first to the hunter, why are there too many projects that after their tokens are sold on the market and forget their obligation to pay the hunters, if I personally let the tokens not listed on the market already be in the wallet instead of waiting for the coins to be listed on the market just distributed to the hunters
-
Whether bounty reward distribution comes first or coin listing on exchange first, it really depend on project team themselves. For me it doesn't really matter as long as I'm able to sell my tokens when i want to. I guess project also want to protect the value of their coin and prevent dump.
-
For me it's better if the coin send to hunters as fast as they can do. With this, Hunters will get their payment in time. Also bounty manager and the project will get good reputation for that. There is so much thing happened if coin will be send after listing when we don't know whetever it'll be listed or not. Something like hunters forget, missed, or project didn't pay will probably happened.
-
Sir you are not 100 % right because now a days a successful exchange arranged bounty campaign project rewards denied. I example such kind of projects, Digital bits, Sudan gold coin, Swace, citios, Bizpaye and many more projects already denied rewards after listing exchanges.
-
One of the best ways to secure a trustworthy project these days is when it is been escrowed. Bounty hunting is almost worthless lately unlike 2017 when it was worth a fortune for hunters who could choose profitable projects with honest team members. No one would feel cheated when the team honour their obligation. It is because the role played by hunters is almost worthless to them that's the reason for the hostile treatment.
-
Coin listing is the main issue to get bounty payment. If the coin is not listed in any exchange then how can you get payment. Actually your payment is depend on your coin and it's price.
-
for me, bounty payment is much more important, not listing first...
although both are the same in my opinion, sometimes payment is the most important thing because maybe in a few years the coins will be listed on the exchange.
-
I have seen many hunters worry for bounty distribution immediately after bounty conclusions while it may not be certain coin/token is listed on any exchange. I think coin should be first listed on exchange, then distribution to all participants take effect.
I have experienced so many bounty payments while coin never listed on exchange, unfortunately project failed to launch and all bounty payments wasted on my wallet till date.
Now, in your opinion, distribution should be sent first or coin should be listed first before bounty distribution, which should come first? Your thoughts. Thanks
Bounty distribution or payment is one of the obligations of the project team or the Owner to fulfill it. But this was too seldom to happen instead most of the project team they've run away and ignored this obligation. And sometimes some projects fulfill the coinlisting but the distribution didn't happen or it may happen but the price is really down in the exchange.
-
Actually, it would be great if we participated in projects that paid coins that were already listed. So that we can monitor approximately how much it costs. However, projects like this are very rare. I myself prefer coin listings before finally getting bounty payment.
-
better follow the bounty that actually pays and it is definitely a listing on the exchange because if it is not listed in exchange most of the project scams do not pay should create experiences that follow are certainly paying bounty and it is definitely a listing on the exchange that has a strong volume.
-
Often times, coin listing comes first and the project always tries to maintain stability in prices before distribution of bounty tokens. Most projects claim to gain exposure, confidence from investors and attract from prospective investors before conclusions of bounty rewards.
-
In my opinion any bounty project should be listed first as soon as it is successful; Bounty hunters should then be rewarded with tokens as soon as possible. Investors should then be paid. Bounty hunters typically get 2 to 3% of a project and work hard to make the project a success; So after a quick listing, the bounty hunters should be paid first. I think this will increase everyone's confidence in the project and the project team
-
Bounty payments and listing does not matter sir, if a project geniune or legit team management, they should payouts Hunter rewards without listing. I already participated many bounties Campaigns but some projects scammed without paying Hunters but they successfully listing exchanges. Some projects payouts hunters payments but flewed away without listing exchanges.
-
The correct arrangement should be registered at the exchange first after that you can distribute tokens to campaign participants.
-
I dont want an asset that will just be stack on my wallet because it was useless, but we should collect our reward right after the listing date. Many projects are not quite successful and having their token on the wallet just reminds me of the wasted energy and data that you spend on that particular project. Im with you with this one.
-
Obviously listing is the main target of a bounty campaign project. Some projects are handling many bounties projects campaign managers but they don't payments before listing because after listing projects in any reputated exchanges, Hunters sold project payments with low prices hence the project hampers acutely.
-
It doesn't matter which comes first as the market is unstable and things might goes oppositely to what we expected. Being reliable have passion compassion towards hunters, members, team, and the whole body of the project is what I think the most important asset. Trust and profit is what we are looking for in any project.
-
Each comes with merit and Demerit.
After Listing - Merit
- assurance of payment
- participants are cap
- Demerit
- You may end up with a few cent.
Before listing - Merit
- Large amount of token allocation for Bounty participants
- You earn more tokens
- Demerit
- The token value may crash if the project foundation is bad
- They may not make full payment if it turn out with good ROI
-
Of course it is best to have the coin on the exchange, as we can see its real price and understand how much we will get from the company's bounty.
-
Bounty payments and listing does not matter sir, if a project geniune or legit team management, they should payouts Hunter rewards without listing. I already participated many bounties Campaigns but some projects scammed without paying Hunters but they successfully listing exchanges. Some projects payouts hunters payments but flewed away without listing exchanges.
The platform should pay their obligations in advance, the number of tokens they promise to the bounty program, regardless of whether the token has been listed on the exchange or not, it is another matter.
-
Coin listing should be first. Payment has no value if it is mot listed. But it is a matter of regret that some bounties give payment before listing. Some projects have failed to list their coin after payment completed by making loss to the bounty hunters. So, payment should be given listing completed.
-
I dont want an asset that will just be stack on my wallet because it was useless, but we should collect our reward right after the listing date. Many projects are not quite successful and having their token on the wallet just reminds me of the wasted energy and data that you spend on that particular project. Im with you with this one.
If the bounty hunters receive the earned tokens after their listing on the exchange, then many of them will really turn out to be an unnecessary burden in our wallets. Indeed, many of them fall in price almost immediately and never return to their previous price level. Therefore, the ICO team must immediately fulfill their promise and pay off all participants in the ICO bounty campaigns. Next, let the bounty hunters decide what they should do with the tokens they receive.
-
Whatever the case, i think the reward token distribution should be completed as soon as possible as there is no reason to hold the reward tokens also it gives a sense of satisfaction to the hunters that their work is acknowledged.
-
First coin listing on exchange they give profit to buyer after send payment to bounty hunter i think good to a good project.
-
The concern is that the project can go on the stock exchange and trade at a good price. And the team may find this payment too generous and reduce the reward by 90%.If the tokens are on the wallet, this will not happen.
-
I love to see the token first in my wallet rather than the other way around. I fell secure that my effort were paid if I see the token in my wallet. sometimes when token is listed first there would be tendency that project team no no longer pay their hunter. they are worried of dumping token so they don't pay the hunters.. I already expience this in a few project.
-
What is clear in my opinion, you should really study the project well before deciding to join in a bounty project. :)
-
The correct arrangement should be registered at the exchange first after that you can distribute tokens to campaign participants.
I don't think so, because there are many projects whose tokens have been listed but run away and don't pay bounty hunters users. Payment should be prioritized to bounty hunters, then listing.
-
no matter, which come first as long as it is paid out to my wallet I really don't care if distribution is later after listing or distribution comes first, my concern is, the value of the token after listing. that's the most important part of the token the value of it. I am joining because I want to convert my earn token to real money that's why the value is what matters most.
-
Let it be bounty payment first. Bounty hunters have suffered enough in the hands of project developers. Many developers have refused to pay hunters after their projects got listed on exchange. Let hunters be paid before exchange listing
-
In my own opinion mate, if coins aren't tradable even after completion of bounty campaign, they should be distributed except in otherwise when it involves regulatory issues. We have seen a lot of projects get listed and after seeing that token price is doing well, settling hunters becomes a problem because greediness has set in.
-
I myself prefer to see the listing coins first. so that since the beginning the bounty has been able to monitor the results that can be obtained later. because it's important, don't get into the bounty but in the end the coins don't actually enter the market. Or even enter a small market for a low price.