IEOs will overtake ICOs sonn.

[Cryptoz]

I have no idea about it for now. IEOs may take the attention of many people with the concept as a safer way for investors to have assets. But ICOs already become a part of cryptocurrency for long time. I think people have already trusted in this way.

[aiviaa485]

I totally agree with the title given by TS because there are a lot of them in various forums.
I agree that the IEO will defeat the ICO but later on, Bounty Hunters will not know where to make money from the IEO because it is clear that the IEO did not give a Bounty prize.

[Malam90]

This is alarming for the bounty hunters that IEOs are now becoming popular and if this popularity increases rapidly, no ICOs will take place sooner or later in my opinion. If ICOs aren't occur, bounty hunters will become worthless.

[Robiul789]

IEO and ICO, two most popular methods of coins sell and buying. Initial exchange offering is more more popular than initial coin offering.

[zendicator]

Yes it is true. As of now, we saw great returns in IEO.

[MVT$]

So what you are saying now is that the success or failure of a start up projects lies at the hands of these centralized exchanges? That doesn't sound right. IEOs may have some advantages to investors but overtaking the ICO model won't  be good for the cryptocurrency market.

[andrewBud]

The problem is that the exchanges expose serious conditions to projects that conduct IEO - including financial ones.  Not all projects are ready to go for these conditions.  Therefore, the ICO will definitely remain.  Simply, the developers will have a choice of format for ICO

[I-Bit]

~snip~ I have come to a conclusion that IEOs will definitely overtake ICOs very soon.

Well, it is pretty true that IEO has a better way to provide a token sale. Moreover, if it is held on a big exchange like Binance or Bittrex. They will be easier to attract investors in this way. It also ensures people with security, transparency, and convenience. Actually, I am not really sure if it can replace ICOs very soon, but it should have a chance.

[juv3ntus1]

The biggest advantaje of Initial Exchange Offering  is the coin you just buy will be listed on that exchange in maximun 1 week,in this way the buyer can recover at least a part on his investment quickly.

[indexx]

IEO makes every party be easier to sell and buy tokens. I think IEO will be a favorite way to sell tokens in the beginning stage. Since ICO has a bad reputation, while IEO seems quite successful, I am sure that project teams will consider choosing IEO than ICO. 

[coinlurker]

Guys, this is what i think about Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) and Initial Coin Offering (ICO); the biggest problem with ICOs is that they’re not monitored by any third parties. Basically, anyone can launch an ICO, as long as you have a white paper to convince investors to put funds into your company.
On the other hand, an IEO is a very, if not entirely, different model. While both ICOs and IEOs share the rationale of an initial public offering (IPO), in an IEO, the exchange becomes an administrator.

To conduct an IEO, the project team must meet and comply with the exchange’s requirements in order to launch the token sale. Contributors are, therefore, protected by the exchange.

Although some may argue that the exchange may go along with the project team to scam customers, this will put the exchange’s reputation at risk. Exchanges that look for a sustainable business model would not consider taking such an unethical move.
However, i have come to a conclusion that IEOs will definitely overtake ICOs very soon. What do you think?

I think so as well IEO is a new development to ICO and what i see from the market is that those ICO that is shifting to IEO do pretty well when their coins are launch but will 100% of ICO move to IEO is still unknown though.

[MVT$]

Some are in favor of IEOs because projects are carefully selected by exchanges and they (investors) do not have to worry about getting scammed. Some are not in favor because it is becoming more centralized now where only bigger investors gets a chance to participate.

As someone who does not have a capital close to a "whale", I would still prefer ICOs as it provides more chance for smaller investors to participate. And I think there are many who share a similar opinion.

[Prime]

IEO has a chance to overtake ICO but it seems not very soon. There are many ICOs that always come regularly. It indicates that ICOs are still good ways to promote and sell tokens/coins. If ICO still can bring investors and be an effective way, I think it will continue and survive.

[Alcor]

It is too early to conclude that IEO has good prospects for replacing it with ICO. It is unlikely that the stock exchanges have the ability to completely filter out fraudsters in this kind of activity. It seems to me that government regulation of ICO activities will be the best way out; such regulation can almost completely rid ICO projects of fraudsters and effectively solve any issues that will arise in the future. The exchanges do not have the necessary powers and opportunities for such regulation.

[masterrex]

For me IEO is an Innovation,the uplifting solution from previous ICO exit scams its quite safer than ICO for sure in terms of the security of the raised funds from IEO since exchange is acting like a escrow between the investors and the team who own the platform. But the concern about IEO is the reputation of the exchange who run and offered the IEO services.