Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed

[Fatiti]

Very true, most project that reaches there hard carp ends up not doing anything or more work about the project because they think they already have the hype while making the project to be useless at the long run..

[jenica]

Very true, most project that reaches there hard carp ends up not doing anything or more work about the project because they think they already have the hype while making the project to be useless at the long run..

Succeed in quick time has not been able to in saying successful full, success is actually if the price in a long time always up, although the increase is not fast but definitely

[robelneo]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

It's not a guaranty but they have a good chance to succeed because they are already funded and they already gained the trust of investors, it's not a guaranty but they are in a good start.

[Fenix]

Achieving hardcap by the ICO team in fundraising only means that investors believed in the prospects of this project and invested their funds in it. However, we know how many times even such ICO projects turned out to be common fraudsters and their teams eventually ran away, and investors lost their money.

[Gyrgen]

So that this does not happen, I think it is very important that the project team was always in good shape and did not stop there.Otherwise, it will lead to the demise of the project.

[ArtCrypt]

I think that hardcap is not a guarantee of the future success of the project. We have faced many times with such companies, which completely failed after a while. I don't know why this is happening. This may be due to the bear market or the lack of a working product.

[moonuranus]

OP's opinion is agreeable, hardcap is nothing if the project's working product is actually non and lack of creativity and initiative to be adopted by the mass, that's why we need to choose those projects the clearly is feasible and realistic.

[aldenlim]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

The ones that run the ICO succeeded if they reached the hard cap because they got all the money that they want to be able to run the project
that they are promoting. But for investors, it does not give the assurance that they will get profit from it because most of the projects that is
reaching its hard cap often being idle and the project stops on upgrading and this are the problems of this shady projects these days.

[Legio]

Yes, hardcap is not a guarantee that ICO is successful, there are many examples of ICOs that are able to reach hardcap but in some time ICO turned out to be scam or dead. what makes ICO successful is how the dev team responds to investors' trust in the ICO and how the market responds.

[ayatoslaw]

Yes, hardcap is not a guarantee that ICO is successful, there are many examples of ICOs that are able to reach hardcap but in some time ICO turned out to be scam or dead. what makes ICO successful is how the dev team responds to investors' trust in the ICO and how the market responds.

Hardcap ICOs should have a big responsibility to make the project better,
because the funds collected have been as expected, and I'm sure a serious project will develop quickly,
and if not serious it will die quickly and develop very long.

[alfatih99]

really true and I also strongly agree with your opinion, but if the ico funds have met the target, ico will usually succeed.

[andrewBud]

Often, developers point very big Hardcap.  In fact, they require much less money to develop.  Therefore, if hardcap is, then often the price goes down.  Because everyone who wanted to buy bought.  As a result, there are often no buyers on exchanges - and the price goes down.

[abdmuiz]

one of the reasons for the success of the cryptocurrency industry is depending on the developer and someone behind the project

[Rofiastuti]

like that I have experienced now, I know Crypto in October 2018 and as a bounty hunter so far I have participated in 3 projects that have finished bounty but it have not been able to be disbursed because the ICO is not yet in the market, or waiting for stable prices to be liquidated first . but I was still looking for a bounty by follow a new project  because I was sure of a bounty sometime.

[Galon]

This is one of the problems in the ICO. The prize hunter is disappointed. If the hardcap of ico is successful, the bounty hunter can get his rights. Apparently not. The project becomes a scammar because the investors are less concerned about the bounty hunter.