follow us on twitter . like us on facebook . follow us on instagram . subscribe to our youtube channel . announcements on telegram channel . ask urgent question ONLY . Subscribe to our reddit . Altcoins Talks Shop Shop


This is an Ad. Advertised sites are not endorsement by our Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise Here

Author Topic: Bitcoin statistical analysis: BTC price and tech sector (part 3 of 4)  (Read 1209 times)

Offline RianDrops

  • Full Member
  • *
  • *
  • Activity: 181
  • points:
    178
  • Karma: -3
  • Altcoinstalks.com supporter from the Philippines.
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Referrals: 3
  • Last Active: August 15, 2018, 10:10:20 AM
    • View Profile

  • Total Badges: 15
    Badges: (View All)
    Topic Starter Poll Voter Poll Starter
In part 3, we draw parallels between BTC and historical trading prices of the big 5 tech companies: IBM, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Google. We also investigate the relationship between price and adoption - which is the first mover?

Statistical analysis of Bitcoin price
There is one metric, BTC trading price, that appears, at least for the time being, more or less unaffected by most blockchain metrics as discussed in the previous section on protocol and network trends. Although at least in theory, issues such as scaling should affect Bitcoin valuation, due to potential limitations of usability and other practicalities, such considerations seem to be at most secondary driving factors of BTC price. Perhaps such mundane considerations will come to bear more directly on the trading price, but at least for the foreseeable future, this seems unlikely to be the case as trading continues to be driven primarily by hype and speculation cycles.

Conversely, the trading price does often have significant impacts on other blockchain metrics, particularly those involving valuation measurements (Fig. 11, 12). A good example of this is the most recent fall off of mining hashing power, as represented by cumulative block size (Fig. 4), very likely a direct result of the recent price decline (Fig. 13, 14). A significant portion of the most inefficient miners have likely been taken offline, owing not only the the lower valuation of mined coinbases, but also the massive decline in transactions, payments, BTC volumes, and fees (Fig. 7, 10-12).

Figure 13: Unconstrained USD/BTC price fits

Figure 13 is a combined plot of full and partial (to July 2017) price fits, all unconstrained regarding their y-intercept values. The partial fits are meant to provide more conservative price fits, by removing any bias introduced by the most proximal bull run. Interestingly, these partial fits, despite their indifference to the recent price spike, plot very similar trends to the long-term 'poly1' full fit.

Figure 14: USD/BTC price fits, constrained through trading origin

read more: https://cryptoinsider.21mil.com/part-3-bitcoin-statistical-analysis-btc-price-and-tech-sector/
▄▄▄████████▄▄▄
▄▄██████████████████▄▄
▄████████████████████████▄
▄████████████████▄▄██▄▄██████▄
██████████████████▀████▀████████
████████████████▄█▀██████▀████████
███████████████▀▀█▄██████▄█████████
██████████████▄█████▄████▄██████████
████████████████████▀▀██▀▀███████████
██████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████▀
▀▀████████████████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
Smarter
Than Crypto
||ANN
BOUNTY
Medium
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Telegram
WEB

Altcoins Talks - Cryptocurrency Forum


 

ETH & ERC20 Tokens Donations: 0x2143F7146F0AadC0F9d85ea98F23273Da0e002Ab
BNB & BEP20 Tokens Donations: 0xcbDAB774B5659cB905d4db5487F9e2057b96147F
BTC Donations: bc1qjf99wr3dz9jn9fr43q28x0r50zeyxewcq8swng
BTC Tips for Moderators: 1Pz1S3d4Aiq7QE4m3MmuoUPEvKaAYbZRoG
Powered by SMFPacks Social Login Mod