How can ICOs come back in the game?

[alltalk]

In my opinion, if ICOs are to come back in the game, then there should be regulations and structures set aside in order for it to meet the standards set by IEOs.

I am interested in this opinion, especially with the regulation you stated above. Can you explain what kind of regulation do you mean here? Will ICO have some institutions to control ICO's activities? I think we will lose the anonymity if there will be a regulation. And "structures" for what?

[KryptoBull]

As we can see, the ICO season is coming back and coexisting with IEO & STO, however the interest in IEO is greater than the ICO, and IEO is also the choice of the majority of new projects to proceed token-sale.
Comparing in detail, conducting an ICO will be cheaper than IEO because the team does not have to pay a large amount to conduct token-sale on an exchange like IEO. On the level of risk: I have seen many IEO fail
We hope that the market will warm up and ICO/IEO/STO will have a good development season.

[tinakoya]

All the scam projects destroyed the reputation of ICOs, for ICOs to come back into the game and be successful again; the team will need to prove themselves beyond reasonable doubt. Either by securing reputable confirmed partnership or advisors. They also really need to bring a unique solution to the table and not another copycat. It's not going to be easy as ICOs era has passed

[Hope4life]

Since now there is a lot IEO with easy to buy a coin, ICO is no longer hype like before. IEO is offer more than ICO, people can buy it safely in reputable exchange. I think it's hard for ICO to come back.

[Alcor]

In my opinion, if ICOs are to come back in the game, then there should be regulations and structures set aside in order for it to meet the standards set by IEOs.

I am interested in this opinion, especially with the regulation you stated above. Can you explain what kind of regulation do you mean here? Will ICO have some institutions to control ICO's activities? I think we will lose the anonymity if there will be a regulation. And "structures" for what?

New ICO projects can again gain their popularity if state regulation of this type of activity is established. I mean organizational regulation, in which states will not delve into the ICO process itself. This can be the registration of these projects and their teams, the issuance of licenses for the ICO, in which each member of the ICO team will be properly identified. At the same time, fraud should be reduced to a minimum.

[juv3ntus1]

It's all about the market conditions right now with all the DeFi hype some Ico have a real succesfull ,for example Avalanche have a public token sale on 15 July and raise $42 million in just 4 hours and half.

[shadowdio]

I don't know how can lift up the ICO again because it's already damaged by the scammers. I guess IEO in the big exchanges is highly chances of success of the project so it's profitable.

[KKH84]

Transparency, like a blockchain network.  And there must be an umbrella that is responsible for the clarity of the project that will run the ICO and the company is required to have run around 70% of the planning target, because many investors want the benefits and clarity of a project.

[ansi]

I don't know how can lift up the ICO again because it's already damaged by the scammers. I guess IEO in the big exchanges is highly chances of success of the project so it's profitable.

Aside from ICO bing scammers most of the time, the IO businesses ruined that niche for good.
Why would any newly launched crypto project make an ICO while he can make it on a decent, famous, big exchange, straight to the crypto communities.
IEO are making it more easy for crypto projects to market their business to the right audience, that's why ICO business is killed by KO.

[krypto4uvak]

I think ICO is no longer relevant. Functions are much more interesting and safer now.

[debra]

I think it will be difficult for ICOs to come back stronger because investors already don't trust anymore in ICOs. Investors must choose IEOs with its better concept than ICOs. It listed the tokens from the beginning of fundraising, so investors are interested to join. They don't want to have tokens that cannot be listed in exchanges anymore like in ICOs.

[UNIVERSE]

Investors prefer to choose IEOs to put their funds nowadays. IEOs is more popular day after day, while ICOs is worse day by day. So, in this matter, ICOs seems to have no chance to come back to the game. People don't expect and believe in ICOs since they have many bad experinces with ICOs.

[TERMINO]

ICO's reputation was destroyed by rampant scam projects in the past and the impact still existing these days. I think it is difficult for ICO'S to come back because of investors bad impression from the past.

[Absolutep]

To me the major problem of ICO is the fraudulent activities that have taken over the system. ICO is very good to me but for scammers that are using it as a means to exploit investors. If we can take away the place of scammers then ICO can come back very strong. I prefer ICO to IEO,  though it might sound funny but I have my reasons. Elimination of scammers will bring back ICO very strong. We still have some ICO running successfully anyway.

[Bit]

I don't think that ICO will rise up again because now it has been replaced by the IEO progress. And newly, the DeFi has been so popular with the new projects. So, if there are newer better ways of projects, shy should we back to the old ICO types?