IEO makes bounty to have a better future?

[pacar_tiri]

Really I agree. Some projects do not launch IEO to sell their tokens (sell directly on the web / ICO), at the end of the campaign, the price of tokens is high, and then, they do not pay the bounty hunter. And that makes us disappointed found.

Yeah I see, some projects don't launch IEO , but successful by sell at their website/ICO.  I think it depends the project and team. When you see themproject and team are good, I think The project will success.

[wxxyrqa]

Really I agree. Some projects do not launch IEO to sell their tokens (sell directly on the web / ICO), at the end of the campaign, the price of tokens is high, and then, they do not pay the bounty hunter. And that makes us disappointed found.

Yeah I see, some projects don't launch IEO , but successful by sell at their website/ICO.  I think it depends the project and team. When you see themproject and team are good, I think The project will success.

some very promising projects have a fairly good and professional team, but do not have the start-up capital for conducting an IEO. If we take, for example, IEO for Binance, then there are a number of conditions, among which there are certain fees for this process.

[Review Master]

Really I agree. Some projects do not launch IEO to sell their tokens (sell directly on the web / ICO), at the end of the campaign, the price of tokens is high, and then, they do not pay the bounty hunter. And that makes us disappointed found.

It's true that projects eventually become successful becuase of their fundamentals or potential. When any projects get huge success without doing any IEO on any exchanges, than team of that projects always try to protect their investors and they might have the fair of a huge dump on the price of that token. Sometimes, project made this type of statement to run away from paying off bounty hunters which is obviously unfair. But real projects don't run away from paying bounty hunters and make a way to stop the huge dump so that both investors and bounty hunters can be on profits.

[Freemind]

A better future for bounty hunters would be if the exchange itself was responsible for sending the coins/tokens to participants. Having the project go straight to the exchange after IEO is great
because the project will have an immediate market volume, but #DevelopmentTeam s can still fool the bounty hunters. That's why I think it's a better future only in part, if the exchange sent the rewards or deposited them into hunters' accounts on the exchange, that would be perfect.

[MishaSER]

A better future for bounty hunters would be if the exchange itself was responsible for sending the coins/tokens to participants. Having the project go straight to the exchange after IEO is great
because the project will have an immediate market volume, but #DevelopmentTeam s can still fool the bounty hunters. That's why I think it's a better future only in part, if the exchange sent the rewards or deposited them into hunters' accounts on the exchange, that would be perfect.

I agree, I don't understand why this has not been done yet. You can also create a special protocol that will be responsible for distributions on the exchange, it is so convenient and safe. You can regulate the distribution, for example, after the 1st month, distribute tokens to bountists in the amount of 10-20% per month. This will protect against price reductions.

[Freemind]

I agree, I don't understand why this has not been done yet. You can also create a special protocol that will be responsible for distributions on the exchange, it is so convenient and safe. You can regulate the distribution, for example, after the 1st month, distribute tokens to bountists in the amount of 10-20% per month. This will protect against price reductions.

There are many ways to do things to make everyone happy. The rewards can be sent in phases, they can be bought by the team or by the exchange itself at a reasonable price, they can be paid with other coins/tokens... There are other possibilities, all it takes is the will to do things right.

[alltalk]

Yeah I see, some projects don't launch IEO , but successful by sell at their website/ICO.  I think it depends the project and team.

IEO isn't a must for a project, but most people now think that good projects provide IEOs. Also, investors likely prefer choosing projects that provide IEOs than ICOs. They think with IEOs, they can see how good the interest from the market to the project. This can create a chance to list on the exchange as the place of the IEOs as well. So, I can say it is about the interest from people. But sure, the quality of the project and the credibility of the team will determine the success of the project.

[Bit]

You may be right. IEO is not only better for bounty but also for investors. People are more sure about the projects if holding an IEO. However, we must also consider what exchanges are sued for doing that IEO. This will also influence thew worth of the coins after that

[Stuart]

IEO or ICO doesn't really matter, if the project will be a success, listing on exchange at fundraising or not will not determine if the project will last for the long run. With a responsible and active team in a project, committed in developing their project and staying up with the market competition, creating divers ways to have the attention of users, that is when we can talk about a project that is ready to stand strong in this system. Though, the IEO makes it more faster for bounties to sell their rewards and make profits immediately without long term waiting for listing.

[Boginya Valyutnaya]

Now it is difficult to say which bounty can be successful.

[pelana vreo]

The success or failure of crypto projects, is not because of IEO, but a team of developers who are very consistent in making marketing strategies so that the platform is better known and investors can understand the goals and objectives of the project.

[David0]

When any projects get huge success without doing any IEO on any exchanges, Looking at which exchanges conduct IEOs, if companies conduct IEOs on scam exchanges such as p2pb2b, exmarkets, vindax, latoken, then you can already forget about these companies, and if companies conduct IEOs on top or medium-sized exchanges, then you can try to trust such companies. It get listed in exchanges quickly.
So bounty hunters make a good profit.

[AGM]

I've experienced this and making many stupid mistakes, losing my valuable time on that road as well. This is most effective way to learn by participating those altcoins bounty campaign at beginning. After surviving most of the garbage bounty campaign, stick just a few those have potential and have accurate info. But now there are many good bounty campaign already finished which was supported by IEO so I appreciate IEO makes bounty to have a better future.

[Delgboke]

I quite agree with your opinions about IEO in terms of bounty campaign to have a good future compares to ICO in bounty Hunting, but it has to do with the campaign team that are behind the Cryptocurrency project that's conducting the particular project, any group of persons that still want to cheat can still cheat weather there's IEO or not is a thing of the mindset.

[Evgenklm]

Now IEO is gradually moving into IDO, the placement and sale of tokens on defi exchanges, this can be said to be a new HYIP, bring a lot of money to this sector, I do not know when it will end, but I see that everything is just beginning in the field of IDO.