IEO makes bounty to have a better future?

[MrSpasybo]

One of the basics of ICOs is that if the ICO fails or the team is not really efficient, the token cannot be listed on exchanges and consequently the token is in the hands of everyone, including Including the bounty hunter has become meaningless. Therefore, IEO is a pretty good solution, and their campaign is worth taking part in compared to other projects!

[alltalk]

Investors aren't interested in ICOs anymore, that's the main reason for most current crypto projects prefer to move on IEOs. This kind of fundraising enables the token/coin to be listed in exchanges from the beginning of fundraising (initial token sale). Investors believe that this way can minimize the potential of scams and have at least listed tokens/coins. They can directly trade the coins/tokens from the beginning or first phase of the project development. So, they don't need to wait for a long time to take advantage. However, IEO cannot guarantee whether the project to stay a long time or not, we still need to take a dep research.

[carcas]

Not all projects are good during the IEO period and they prefer to do IEO in an unfavorable market. Unless the project is doing IEO in a good market like Binance and Probit then their sales will be better than choosing a bad market

[hushpupppy]

One thing you need to come to terms with is the fact that bounty hunting is not dependent on whether a token is conducting ieo, ico or crowdfunding.
Bounty campaign goes beyond just ieo.

For example, iq cash bounty is a listed project, same as velas and even waykichain bounty to

[debra]

You are right, buddy. IEO can make crypto project a bit better this year because they provide coins/tokens that are already listed on exchanges. IEO is the right way to prevent scams and failed projects, but it never guarantees you.

[corr]

IEO is simply fundraising by developers in order to make money. IEO is also a hope for investors who have invested in the project to make more money. I don't think the IEO project should be considered good at once. Mostly IEOs are conducted by such exchanges as binance, bittrex, okex and other large exchanges and they obviously receive money from the team for it. So all these projects with their IEO are just business and that doesn't mean they are good projects

[Magician]

I don't think there's any connection between IEOs and bounties. If a project decides to sell tokens on an exchange, it will likely to skip the bounty phase. If a project announces an IEO but still runs a bounty then the bounty will be full of participants. Yes, if all projects held IEOs on good exchanges then bounty would have a better future. But the fact is, most of the projects are scams nowadays.

[marplen]

Bounties are out of date
Also promotion from bounty is a rubbish

[Alter]

Bounties are out of date
Also promotion from bounty is a rubbish

Many bounties are worthless but it doesn't mean all rubbish. You are wrong if you stated bounties are out of date, it is still good way to promote new projects/coins. You may view it from a wrong point of view.

[Renampun]

IEO & ICO = same IMO...
not 100% IEO clearly pays, many ends up scam, so I feel IEO is the same as like ICO which much of them ends up scam.

[UNIVERSE]

IEO & ICO = same IMO...
not 100% IEO clearly pays, many ends up scam, so I feel IEO is the same as like ICO which much of them ends up scam.

What are the similarities you want to say? You said most, it is just if you joined the bounty without your own research. And yes, no guarantee for big payment even it is IEO. However, IEO makes bounty hunters at least to get paid with tokens already listed on exchanges.

[Noverteno]

I have seen some changes in new crypto projects currently. Most of them have listed their coins/tokens from the beginning of fundraising (IEO). I think the current new projects are much better than new projects in 2018. And you know what? It makes bounties have a better future this year. Do you agree with me? 

It is possible that in 2018 there were many bad ICO projects. Apparently, this was explained by the fact that after the massive success of ICO projects in 2017, when even bad ICO projects collected millions of dollars, many decided to simply earn extra money on this or even deceive investors. Now the situation has changed. Bad ICO projects have virtually no chance of a successful fundraising campaign. Even promising projects are not always successful. Therefore, the market now has more good projects, teams of useless projects no longer want to waste time, effort and money in vain.

[mr.Robot]

I have seen some changes in new crypto projects currently. Most of them have listed their coins/tokens from the beginning of fundraising (IEO). I think the current new projects are much better than new projects in 2018. And you know what? It makes bounties have a better future this year. Do you agree with me? 

well according to me, IEO can't make the future of a project, it makes itself. For a better IEO the project should have a better future, people will invest on IEO if they can promise success and share unique innovations or ideas. And if you are talking about IEO from big exchanges, they take only real-time projects who have value in the real-world not just based on a token value. If I say in short, IEO makes the exchange more profitable than the projects. And from 2017 to now, there always have bad and good both quality projects, all you have to do is pick the real one.

[Coin63@]

I don't believe your comments because all ieo arranged projects don't succeed or even have no better future. If you invest in cindex ieo on bitforex, kingcasino ieo on Latoken, p2pb2b and Drife ieo on exmarket. They already vained and their team members not active on online. So be careful about projects before investing.

[Istiak]

What do you mean by better future for bounty? Bounty participants get way fewer payments than it was in 2018. But if you are talking about preventing scam projects from being promoted then maybe it will prevent some of them but not all of them. Because there are some low-quality exchange that will list any shit project for some money. After that, it will look more legit so that it can attract investors. At the end, this type of projects dump their own token.