IEO makes bounty to have a better future?

[Jaguar]

Some projects conducted IEO but still failed to achieve their goals. Some times they just used IEO to catch big fish further business for 24 hours volume and market cap, however slowly fading until totally vanished and left the project. Whether conducted ICO and IEO, the project success depends on the team faithfulness and determination to win the volatile place.

[Calantha]

If the IEO makes a successful bonus, the project will bring profit to the investor. In addition, the exchange has increased the reputation and revenue from trading activities of users.

[KKH84]

As long as a new project is doing an IEO on a top exchange, I think it will help the bounty hunter to get what is rightfully his, but if the IEO is done on a not-so-well-known exchange it can sometimes end up in a scam.  In my opinion, new projects do not have to rely on 100% of IEO funds, at least the company has been running 60-70% before launching the IEO.

[I-Bit]

Whether conducted ICO and IEO, the project success depends on the team faithfulness and determination to win the volatile place.

Indeed. The success doesn't depend on IEO or ICO, but how good the team members to run the project and how the quality of the project itself. For me, it is the main factor to make a project be successful. But surely, there are many other things to influence the projects whether to succeed or fail.

[yohananaomi]

what distinguishes it from an ICO and is now an IEO and has even become Defi.
nothing distinguishes as long as humans who are greedy and always make fraud continue to move freely, then it will not be able to change it and there will be many new scam projects.

what is needed is to minimize the fraud made by those irresponsible by not giving the opportunity to grow and support their new project, with cooperation of all parties who want crypto to change for the better, even though it cannot completely eliminate but efforts to reduce we have tried.

ICO = Dev
IEO = Exchanger

[hair]

The success doesn't depend on IEO or ICO, but how good the team members to run the project and how the quality of the project itself. For me, it is the main factor to make a project be successful. But surely, there are many other things to influence the projects whether to succeed or fail.

Sure. the main thing is quality, if the project does not have quality and innovation, investors will certainly leave it. No less important is how big the community of a project is, support from the community will be able to show the success of an ICO / IEO

[Fenix]

Now there is a new direction in cryptocurrency, these are DeFi projects. Everyone is talking about their dizzying success. These projects are still giving a powerful impetus to the further growth of the ICO market. Well, the cryptocurrency is still developing and in the future we can expect many more similar surprises.

[ashraf786100]

I agree that the IEO will offer rewards for a better future. bounty hunters can receive the token prices that are listed on the exchange. So, they can sell tokens there or plan to keep the tokens for long term investment.

[Hometown]

Probit exchange arranged bounty campaign must not be succeed. You can see at a glance, homt, ezystayz and mozox, stibs and so others. Only Binance, OKEx, kucoin, Houbi, MXC, bilaxy, coinbene and bitforex ieo arranged campaigns 100% successful.

[David0]

Really I agree. Some projects do not launch IEO to sell their tokens (sell directly on the web / ICO), at the end of the campaign, the price of tokens is high, and then, they do not pay the bounty hunter. And that makes us disappointed found.

[Delgboke]

I don't really agree to that anyway but there's atom of truth on what you said compare to what happened in 2018 ,when we normally see Cryptocurrency running ICO that mostly exit the industry without exchange listing but IEO is some how better now but my disagreement is any project can still do exit scam even when the project is already listed in the exchange is a thing of the mind.

[Freemind]

What we have IEOs to thank for is the security they provide to investors and other users. Investors (and bounty hunters) know that after investing in an IEO, the product will be available on one or more exchanges. Security is higher for investors as bounty hunters can be misled by the project team and not receive their coins/tokens.

[robert20]

I think makes the bounty better.
Because through IEO the project gets a good amount of investment which makes the development of the project even faster than before. It get listed in exchanges quickly.
So bounty hunters make a good profit.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Yeah, it is always better to participate in bounties that the token or coin are already listed on the exchanges, this gives one the idea or hope that they are not working or promoting the project in vain, I personally have made the decision that never again will I be participating in bounties that the token or coins are not listed on exchanges yet cus the risks are too high, except in a situation where I couldn't find anyone that is listed that I qualify to participate in, then I can make do with the one that is not yet listed but most promising just like in the case of this signature am wearing now.
So I totally agree with the opinion that IEOs have made bounties a bit better than it used to be way back in 2016, 2017 and 2018.

[Tristanerus]

I have seen some changes in new crypto projects currently. Most of them have listed their coins/tokens from the beginning of fundraising (IEO). I think the current new projects are much better than new projects in 2018. And you know what? It makes bounties have a better future this year. Do you agree with me? 

I hope so, for me, Its till depend how reliable the tokens that they promoting, I mean the important of the token that to be apart of an altcoins that wil be listed in coinmarketcap, Like ETH,XRP,CARDANO AND many more.