Is it the biggest mistake of Coinmarketcap?

[Malam90]

Today my eyes rise to forehead ‍when i entered coinmarketcap for info. I saw that FLOW a new Coin which takes the rank 1 on coinmarketcap. Is it funny? Is it the greatest mistake of Coinmarketcap?
It's marketcap $110,883,232,890,392,688 which is unlimited x higher than Bitcoin. Lol 
CMC link: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/flow/

[Master107]

To be honest, every time there's a mistake particularly overtaking the rank #1 where supposedly it is Bitcoin. My personal view to that is indirect/direct promotional. It is impossible that coinmarketcap didn't noticed this mistake not unless they did it purposely and then go back to reality again where Bitcoin is the real #1. Haha

[pelana vreo]

Looks like this isn't a mistake and it's a joke.
I have seen a list of 0 rankings on coinmarketcup. I don't think mistakes will happen over and over again. Because coinmarketcup is a trusted crypto coin information provider platform.

[TomPluz]

I think we have to understand that CMC these days got the habit of either making a big joke or maybe having just another unique way of advertising something. I am also sure this is not a mistake as I know that people behind CMC are all very careful especially with the ranking because that is at the core of its business of being the best and the most popular crypto data aggregator. Maybe CMC is just making us laugh.

[Senin]

Today my eyes rise to forehead ‍when i entered coinmarketcap for info. I saw that FLOW a new Coin which takes the rank 1 on coinmarketcap. Is it funny? Is it the greatest mistake of Coinmarketcap?
It's marketcap $110,883,232,890,392,688 which is unlimited x higher than Bitcoin. Lol 
CMC link: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/flow/

In the morning I went to the CoinMarketCap table and did not notice anything unusual. After reading this topic, I went back in. The bug was apparently fixed rather quickly.
If someone wanted to do as it was several times earlier - to advertise a certain type of cryptocurrency, then they would indicate Flow, as before, under the number "zero", and this, apparently, was still a mistake, since Flow was just listed under the first number instead of bitcoin.
Maybe later we will find out the reason for such an unusual phenomenon.

[nadyn]

Probably you shouldn't be strict with Coinmarketcap, everyone has mistakes. And this is not the only mistake of this resource, often the coin shows a price - which does not actually correspond to the value of the coin.

[nicecrypto]

Today my eyes rise to forehead ‍when i entered coinmarketcap for info. I saw that FLOW a new Coin which takes the rank 1 on coinmarketcap. Is it funny? Is it the greatest mistake of Coinmarketcap?
It's marketcap $110,883,232,890,392,688 which is unlimited x higher than Bitcoin. Lol 
CMC link: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/flow/

In the morning I went to the CoinMarketCap table and did not notice anything unusual. After reading this topic, I went back in. The bug was apparently fixed rather quickly.
If someone wanted to do as it was several times earlier - to advertise a certain type of cryptocurrency, then they would indicate Flow, as before, under the number "zero", and this, apparently, was still a mistake, since Flow was just listed under the first number instead of bitcoin.
Maybe later we will find out the reason for such an unusual phenomenon.

Yeah I believe they did that rather quickly and after the Game stop App thing I also saw this same issue on CoinmarketCap where I noticed that morning that WallStreetBet which I dont believe is actually any crypto asset was ranking No. 1 on CoinMarketCap and was also quickly corrected afterwards. I guess this issues happen with technology 

[Freemind]

Mistake?. Or a way to covertly promote that project?. You can call me paranoid if you want, but every day I believe less in those Coinmarketcap "mistakes", which coincidentally always put a new or little known project first. Mistakes like that can make something foam up.

[Andruha1993]

Now there are always mistakes on the coinmarketcap, so there is nothing surprising here, I have already stopped paying attention to this.

[Churphans]

Now there are always mistakes on the coinmarketcap, so there is nothing surprising here, I have already stopped paying attention to this.

It's a common mistakes of coinmarketcap authorities, a few days ago wallstreetbets coin on zero ranked position which made us astonished. But Flow in zero ranked providing wrong information which also astonished but not more .

[Freemind]

@Churphans what happened with Wallstreetbets was not a mistake, it was something done on purpose by Coinmarketcap to pay tribute in some way to what happened with the Robon Hood app. On the other hand, I don't understand what's going on with FLOW, which is why I said "covert promotion" in my previous post.

[hadi97bd]

We all are not far from mistakes so coinmarketcap also has made a mistake because we all have known BTC is the Father of all cryptocurrency and it has biggest amount of other coin so obviously coinmarketcap has made a mistake.

[Review Master]

TBH, it might be done from the developer side as developer team are improving the UI of CMC after binance has acquired it. Also, it's not any kind of tribute as Flow is now on 71th rank in CMC. Not only this, it was happened because of the wrong number about total circulating supply and maybe, it's just because of the api which cmc used to get data from the contract address of etherscan, IMO.

[robert20]

To be honest, every time there's a mistake particularly overtaking the rank #1 where supposedly it is Bitcoin. My personal view to that is indirect/direct promotional. It is impossible that coinmarketcap didn't noticed this mistake not unless they did it purposely and then go back to reality again where Bitcoin is the real #1. Haha

I am also thinking that it can be a promotional thing. CMC can do this for money i suppose. Because it is not a small mistake at all to make one currency at the #1 position. But it can also happen that  this a mistake of a bot to calculate.

[jhm]

I feel I'm qualfied to comment on this, looked at the cap list for years. Wish they didn't list bad projects, same with similar lists. Better vetting is needed, if they cared