I would like news articles like this to more clearly reflect the essence of the topic raised. Quite often, expressions are used that allow multiple interpretations, but because no clear specifics are indicated.
In this case, it is written that in Russia "the issue of attributing virtual assets to property for the purposes of criminal proceedings has not been resolved." What does this mean? Everything is very hazy. The Criminal Code of each country contains a list of specific criminal offenses and the punishment for those who committed them. Why is it impossible to directly indicate what actions with cryptocurrency the employees of the Prosecutor General's Office of Russia propose to be considered criminal, so that you can talk about this topic?