While I do not oppose hardware wallets, I fail to see how they are superior to software wallets. If an individual is proficient in using software wallets, they are unlikely to lose their funds.
The best wallet depends on each person, from knowledge, budget, technical practice and even more. There is no same best wallet for you and for me.
Cold wallets are safer than hot wallets and hardware wallets are cold wallets.
With software wallets like Electrum, you can create multi-sign, cold storage or air-gapped wallets and they are safer than single signature wallet (hot wallet).
Conversely, if someone is not familiar with wallet storage, a hardware wallet will not be of much assistance. It is worth noting that Ledger, a popular hardware wallet, recently experienced a vulnerability that affected many users, causing them to lose faith in the product due to its cloud storage of seed phrases.
Ledger is a close source hardware wallet as I noted in my previous post.
I knew what you want to say here, Ledger messed up and even destroyed the idea of hardware wallet by launching their
Ledger Recovery service.The fragments are securely distributed using end-to-end encrypted and authenticated channels to the Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) of three independent companies – Ledger, Coincover, and EscrowTech. Each fragment on its own is a useless set of random numbers.
Three entities will have three pieces of your wallet seed phrase, it is not good and safe.
If I want to have best safety for my bitcoin, I want to own my private key (or wallet seed phrase). Because
Not your keys, not your coins. Relying on two other entities, Ledger and Coincover for backups and recovery is very bad idea.