Yes I support your argument as there was a need to have a bitcoin logo. If it had a nice looking bitcoin logo it would look nicer as well and all the users would be interested in getting it. So I would like to know your advice whether it is correct to do this in a new way and give bitcoin logo. Would it be good to give the logo?
Why do you think having the unijoin.io logo on the card is not good enough?
Go to Icarus’ website[1] and see the look of other cards (that have btc logo) that have been designed, when you're done come back to this thread and tell which one of them has a nicer design compared to Unijoin’s. It's not a must that they should be a big-ass-looking Bitcoin logo for it to be attractive, the current design looks stunning already.
[1] https://icarus-cards.eu/shop/
Well, I honestly agree with you, the current design of the Unijoin card is indeed very beautiful, most especially, the color which gives it a very deep and crystal look, makes it look very quality and premium, even while a person is yet to see and touch the card physically.
But however, I will also buy into the idea of adding a small bitcoin logo if possible, since the card functions as a bitcoin wallet, a small or tiny bitcoin logo in one of the top corners won't look so bad on the card to be honest, that wont damage the current design, and seeing that logo, anyone who have never heard about Unijoin before should already be able to tell what the card represents through the bitcoin logo.
But anyways, I honestly do not see any of this as something that is really important, if it's very easy to include a bitcoin logo at one of the top corners, that would be nice, but in the absence of any easy way to do this, the card is still very perfectly beautiful as it is.