Is gambling acceptable in your country?

[LUCKMCFLY]

Earlier it was not very strict but now it is becoming very strict. If the police see you gambling then you will definitely be arrested. Currently many big influencers of our country have been arrested for promoting this gambling advertisement. So it is okay to say that it is illegal in our country.

For me those things are not pleasant, a government cannot subjugate a people, there must be freedom in every sense, if a person wants to gamble then they can do it, it does not harm anyone, before they said that casinos were bad only because the people became addicted, but they do not know that the person responsible for the addiction is that same person, then it is something that does not make sense that at this point in life there are countries with those dictatorships.

[pieppiep]

Earlier it was not very strict but now it is becoming very strict. If the police see you gambling then you will definitely be arrested. Currently many big influencers of our country have been arrested for promoting this gambling advertisement. So it is okay to say that it is illegal in our country.

For me those things are not pleasant, a government cannot subjugate a people, there must be freedom in every sense, if a person wants to gamble then they can do it, it does not harm anyone, before they said that casinos were bad only because the people became addicted, but they do not know that the person responsible for the addiction is that same person, then it is something that does not make sense that at this point in life there are countries with those dictatorships.

However, general freedom is very precious and people should not be deprived of their rights to make decisions that pertain to their individual choices such as gambling. However, here one should remember that the role of the state shall not only be a limiting one but also informative about the outcome of the choices that are made. While it can be said that gambling can be classified as an entertainment for some people, the influence of this activity on people and society in general can be much more serious if necessary measures are not taken. What may have to be underscored is the duty of people to keep their choices restrained with a system that would effectively deter and not necessarily restrict.

[Stuart]

To some points, maybe the country's leaders are trying to protect its citizens from gambling addiction or something related, and that could be the reasons behind the restrictions and ban. Online gambling has made gamblers bye pass some country's rules and restrictions placed on gambling. In my country, it is not restricted by anyone, and for the online gambling, it is free as bird. If not for the recent ban uplift from Bitcoin/Crypto currencies, gambling sites has never faced any form of ban, restriction or regulations before to the little best of my knowledge, related to gambling.

[0t3p0t]

To some points, maybe the country's leaders are trying to protect its citizens from gambling addiction or something related, and that could be the reasons behind the restrictions and ban. Online gambling has made gamblers bye pass some country's rules and restrictions placed on gambling. In my country, it is not restricted by anyone, and for the online gambling, it is free as bird. If not for the recent ban uplift from Bitcoin/Crypto currencies, gambling sites has never faced any form of ban, restriction or regulations before to the little best of my knowledge, related to gambling.

Despite the banning there are still illegal operators continue to spread their gambling business. My country is waging war against these operations and I am okay with that but I am wondering how serious and presice they are when it comes to those who slips from their regulations they should ban all them them but the problem is that they said it could also hurt the government fund because taxes were gone. I don't think it's the government fund that is affected here but it seems politicians also has shares. 😅

[pieppiep]

To some points, maybe the country's leaders are trying to protect its citizens from gambling addiction or something related, and that could be the reasons behind the restrictions and ban. Online gambling has made gamblers bye pass some country's rules and restrictions placed on gambling. In my country, it is not restricted by anyone, and for the online gambling, it is free as bird. If not for the recent ban uplift from Bitcoin/Crypto currencies, gambling sites has never faced any form of ban, restriction or regulations before to the little best of my knowledge, related to gambling.

Despite the banning there are still illegal operators continue to spread their gambling business. My country is waging war against these operations and I am okay with that but I am wondering how serious and presice they are when it comes to those who slips from their regulations they should ban all them them but the problem is that they said it could also hurt the government fund because taxes were gone. I don't think it's the government fund that is affected here but it seems politicians also has shares. 😅

In this case the problem is not a simple one. On the one hand, the fight against the further development of illicit gambling is the correct decision to reduce the negative consequences of such activity. And, just for the lost tax motives, as if such gambling operations have to be kept, I believe that is the wrong rationale. If there are politicians involved or even having some shares in this business, it is apparent to infringe the public policy because it vitiates the credibility of the politicians. Policies on political and business circles should not be just economic in nature, law making bodies and individuals in society must also be ever determined to eradicate the evils concerning legal gambling, and the policies set must indeed should mean business for the goodness of society.

[LUCKMCFLY]

While it can be said that gambling can be classified as an entertainment for some people, the influence of this activity on people and society in general can be much more serious if necessary measures are not taken. What may have to be underscored is the duty of people to keep their choices restrained with a system that would effectively deter and not necessarily restrict.

If you are right, well although I start from the fact that we as humans have the right to do and play in whatever we consider, governments should never interfere in the entertainment that human beings have, unless it is to do bad things like drugs and among other things, but a casino is a business, it is a means of adult entertainment, that is reason enough not to prohibit it, but each country has its rules and its way of doing things.

[Baofeng]

To some points, maybe the country's leaders are trying to protect its citizens from gambling addiction or something related, and that could be the reasons behind the restrictions and ban. Online gambling has made gamblers bye pass some country's rules and restrictions placed on gambling. In my country, it is not restricted by anyone, and for the online gambling, it is free as bird. If not for the recent ban uplift from Bitcoin/Crypto currencies, gambling sites has never faced any form of ban, restriction or regulations before to the little best of my knowledge, related to gambling.

Despite the banning there are still illegal operators continue to spread their gambling business. My country is waging war against these operations and I am okay with that but I am wondering how serious and presice they are when it comes to those who slips from their regulations they should ban all them them but the problem is that they said it could also hurt the government fund because taxes were gone. I don't think it's the government fund that is affected here but it seems politicians also has shares. 😅

In this case the problem is not a simple one. On the one hand, the fight against the further development of illicit gambling is the correct decision to reduce the negative consequences of such activity. And, just for the lost tax motives, as if such gambling operations have to be kept, I believe that is the wrong rationale. If there are politicians involved or even having some shares in this business, it is apparent to infringe the public policy because it vitiates the credibility of the politicians. Policies on political and business circles should not be just economic in nature, law making bodies and individuals in society must also be ever determined to eradicate the evils concerning legal gambling, and the policies set must indeed should mean business for the goodness of society.

It's simply, don't be a corrupt official, like mayors and governors and police and this illegal gambling could be eradicated in our country. The thing is that they are the protector and they are in the payroll of this crime syndicates.

And with that, no one will be arrested, except for the small fish. But the operator behind can't be touch by the police because of the protection by the higher ups including generals.

[pieppiep]

It's simply, don't be a corrupt official, like mayors and governors and police and this illegal gambling could be eradicated in our country. The thing is that they are the protector and they are in the payroll of this crime syndicates.

And with that, no one will be arrested, except for the small fish. But the operator behind can't be touch by the police because of the protection by the higher ups including generals.

This is a very accurate statement I have learned that one can never win the battle against this vice due to the fact that officials who are supposed to fight this vice are involved in the vice. When the authorities and the officials are involved in a criminal syndicate, it will become challenging to promote justice. What you said is correct that most of the time only the small fish is caught while the big fish is set free to go. My personal view is that change can only occur if there is a desire from within the institution to rid itself out of bad eggs. More support especially from the community is needed so that it does not become a norm for girls to be violated and face the consequences alone.

[Stuart]

To some points, maybe the country's leaders are trying to protect its citizens from gambling addiction or something related, and that could be the reasons behind the restrictions and ban. Online gambling has made gamblers bye pass some country's rules and restrictions placed on gambling. In my country, it is not restricted by anyone, and for the online gambling, it is free as bird. If not for the recent ban uplift from Bitcoin/Crypto currencies, gambling sites has never faced any form of ban, restriction or regulations before to the little best of my knowledge, related to gambling.

Despite the banning there are still illegal operators continue to spread their gambling business. My country is waging war against these operations and I am okay with that but I am wondering how serious and presice they are when it comes to those who slips from their regulations they should ban all them them but the problem is that they said it could also hurt the government fund because taxes were gone. I don't think it's the government fund that is affected here but it seems politicians also has shares. 😅

Most countries that are more interested in making money from its people will are the ones that will take a look at the taxes these gambling sites are putting into the country's treasury. Politicians always have a part to play in situations like this, while those who made their money with some dirty touch wants the gambling business to continue so as to stay behind the shadows.

Countries that are most and major concern is for the betterment of its citizens will ban gambling or place a big tax fee on them for them to go away or stay and struggle with the levy placed on them.