How much % of your assets are allocated to crypto?

[Roseline492]

The Enkrypt wallet shows 100% of the crypto coins I hold in it. This is split into 89% which is BNB and the remaining 11% ETH. While the rest is on an investment site called AIRT coin. I keep in mind that it will pay off more if I transfer the majority to investing for the long term.

If you intend to switch to long-term investments, you should choose bitcoin and ethereum. 50% of my crypto assets contain bitcoin and ethereum, the rest are potential altcoins such as BNB, Solana, TRX, Matic etc. maybe I will buy coins from a new project, but wait for this month's profit.

Yeah is a good advice because the reason why ETH should be considered is because it has proven to be one of the most potential coin because one of the ways to evaluate the authenticity of a coin is when they are able to survive within number of years and in this case ETH performance has been very impressive compare to every other altcoins because since it was listed on the market it has been doing very well and I could remember how low was the price years ago and how far they have gone now so perhaps there is no doubt that along the line they will certainly improved more than the way they are now.

So actually investing on both Bitcoin and ETH is not a bad decision but the person shouldn't expect so much price increases on ETH within a short while because in terms of price movement we cannot compare Bitcoin with ETH so the only way to really expect any tangible thing on ETH investment is through long term holding, though for me my major investment is on Bitcoin and I intend to hold for at least five to six years with the belief of having a good return.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Read the bold statement again, I say about 'inexperienced investors' specifically.

Yeah I read it before.
What I'm trying to say is that, sometimes even experienced investors/traders can also get caught up in market hype and speculations and end up making impulsive decisions with unrealistic goals.
And likewise sometimes even inexperienced investors who has little experience about the market can also go all in but considering the asset's long-term potentials rather than the short-term gains which can help them ride out temporary market fluctuations and still keep them in profit. It's all about perspective and making the right choice.

[MrSpasybo]

Yeah is a good advice because the reason why ETH should be considered is because it has proven to be one of the most potential coin because one of the ways to evaluate the authenticity of a coin is when they are able to survive within number of years and in this case ETH performance has been very impressive compare to every other altcoins because since it was listed on the market it has been doing very well and I could remember how low was the price years ago and how far they have gone now so perhaps there is no doubt that along the line they will certainly improved more than the way they are now.

So actually investing on both Bitcoin and ETH is not a bad decision but the person shouldn't expect so much price increases on ETH within a short while because in terms of price movement we cannot compare Bitcoin with ETH so the only way to really expect any tangible thing on ETH investment is through long term holding, though for me my major investment is on Bitcoin and I intend to hold for at least five to six years with the belief of having a good return.

Yeah, BTC and ETH always deserve a place in your crypto investment portfolio because they can guarantee profits for investors, even if they are not as large as many other ALTS in the market that we often hear about. History has shown that they always create new ATHs in a new cycle, meaning that investors have less risk of losing money if they hold for the long term.

However, I do not recommend holding BTC and ETH continuously from one cycle to the next as this can create a lot of psychological pressure for holders. We all know that the crypto market period is 4 years, which means that we can complete our investment after every 4 years to take profits at the top and accumulate again at the bottom to optimize profits.

[Jamal Aezaz]

The bounty campaign depends on the allocation given, when the allocation is large enough it is still profitable, but when we see that the allocation given is very limited then the results we work on will be worthless. It's better if we combine the Bounty Campaign with Airdrop, we have to do everything. It is true that there is no guarantee that we will get a lot of results, but at least if we actively do everything, we will increase our chances of getting quite high results.

Bounty campaigns allocate a limited amount so if there are a large number of participants then reward will be minimum but if the number of individuals are less then the reward will be maximum therefore it is not always necessary that you will get a huge amount from the bounty campaign.

On the other hand airdrops are worthy but it is necessary to get your reward before it loses its value over time because as the time goes the value of tokens reduces so that person will get huge reward who sells first. One should not neglect the value of any of these because if we are a part of both then our reward will be maximum and we will be able to get advantage of both as a consequence of which we can easily make investment with such huge profit.

[libert19]

On the other hand airdrops are worthy but it is necessary to get your reward before it loses its value over time because as the time goes the value of tokens reduces so that person will get huge reward who sells first.

This is not always true; I sold my airdrop of $TIA and $UNI early, but they both made ATH of 7x after, while for $ARB you are right, the moment it got listed it had a pump to around $7 but suffered huge dump after, and we are yet to see it reach same peak again.

What I mean to say is, we can't predict for sure whether one should sell early or sell later.

[$crypto$]

On the other hand airdrops are worthy but it is necessary to get your reward before it loses its value over time because as the time goes the value of tokens reduces so that person will get huge reward who sells first.

This is not always true; I sold my airdrop of $TIA and $UNI early, but they both made ATH of 7x after, while for $ARB you are right, the moment it got listed it had a pump to around $7 but suffered huge dump after, and we are yet to see it reach same peak again.

What I mean to say is, we can't predict for sure whether one should sell early or sell later.

This depends on how the project can maintain and attract more interest from investors. Many coins end up increasing many times over, but quite a few also end up decreasing in price because many investors abandon them.

We have to see how the project builds trust in the community, because what I have seen is that some coins eventually decline because they disappoint the community and in the end they are slowly abandoned.

[MrSpasybo]

This is not always true; I sold my airdrop of $TIA and $UNI early, but they both made ATH of 7x after, while for $ARB you are right, the moment it got listed it had a pump to around $7 but suffered huge dump after, and we are yet to see it reach same peak again.

What I mean to say is, we can't predict for sure whether one should sell early or sell later.

Evaluating the potential of a project is not difficult, but predicting the future price movement of a token is much more complex. This is because many worthless tokens, such as memecoins, can still experience strong price increases, while valuable tokens, such as ARB or PYTH, can experience sell-offs and see their prices fall multiple times from their ATHs. Even fundamental analysts find it difficult to predict short-term token price movements. They can typically only make long-term predictions when the value of the project is reflected in the token price.

By effectively managing their portfolios, hunters can find ways to maintain an appropriate allocation of assets in crypto. For example, if a hunter wants to hold 50% of their assets in crypto, they could sell 50% of their reward tokens for USDT and only hold the remaining 50%. This could help them secure profits while still having the opportunity to increase their wealth through future token price appreciation.

[doc]

On the other hand airdrops are worthy but it is necessary to get your reward before it loses its value over time because as the time goes the value of tokens reduces so that person will get huge reward who sells first.

This is not always true; I sold my airdrop of $TIA and $UNI early, but they both made ATH of 7x after, while for $ARB you are right, the moment it got listed it had a pump to around $7 but suffered huge dump after, and we are yet to see it reach same peak again.

What I mean to say is, we can't predict for sure whether one should sell early or sell later.

This depends on how the project can maintain and attract more interest from investors. Many coins end up increasing many times over, but quite a few also end up decreasing in price because many investors abandon them.

We have to see how the project builds trust in the community, because what I have seen is that some coins eventually decline because they disappoint the community and in the end they are slowly abandoned.

Yes, the project team should think about the sustainability of their coins so that they remain useful for many people. Many projects are abandoned due to the failure of the project team to maintain it, carry out promotions and update the technology they use.

[Z-tight]

Many projects are abandoned due to the failure of the project team to maintain it, carry out promotions and update the technology they use.

Some coins or tokens are just shitcoins and it is surely going to dump and die off, no matter what the developers do. A large percent of new coins do not have any utility, so people who are lucky to witness its early pump will dump it on others, and because it is not useful for anything, there is no demand to pump it up again.

[yohananaomi]

Many projects are abandoned due to the failure of the project team to maintain it, carry out promotions and update the technology they use.

Some coins or tokens are just shitcoins and it is surely going to dump and die off, no matter what the developers do. A large percent of new coins do not have any utility, so people who are lucky to witness its early pump will dump it on others, and because it is not useful for anything, there is no demand to pump it up again.

We have to admit that what you say is true, that currently it is difficult to get new coins that are of good quality and can survive and can grow and make a contribution to investors who have bought them.
As you said, it only takes a moment to increase at first and has no use and just becomes a trash coin that has no meaning at all after that.
It is difficult to be able to develop well every time a new coin appears because it is always only looking for short-term profits, not to develop for a long time.

[$crypto$]

This depends on how the project can maintain and attract more interest from investors. Many coins end up increasing many times over, but quite a few also end up decreasing in price because many investors abandon them.

We have to see how the project builds trust in the community, because what I have seen is that some coins eventually decline because they disappoint the community and in the end they are slowly abandoned.

Yes, the project team should think about the sustainability of their coins so that they remain useful for many people. Many projects are abandoned due to the failure of the project team to maintain it, carry out promotions and update the technology they use.

Everything must be sustainable and developers must know the factors by which their project can be trusted by many people. They cannot work half-heartedly, if that happens then the project they are building will fail.

When they plan a new project, they must be serious about working on it, lest they not work optimally which will cause the project to be abandoned. They can also learn from projects that experience success.

[Z-tight]

We have to admit that what you say is true, that currently it is difficult to get new coins that are of good quality and can survive and can grow and make a contribution to investors who have bought them.

This is the reason why i have little or no interest in new coins, it is just filled with pump and dump coins, and you have to be very lucky to get some money from them. Some people believe that if you buy a lot of these new coins, you have to earn something from them, but that is not true, if you are unlucky to buy only shitcoins, then no matter how many you bought, you will lose all your money.

[Jaephoenix]

I think the confidence people have towards cryptocurrencies and digital assets is increasing. People are adding more funds towards investing. Not only is the confidence increase, the government in some countries have reduced tax rates and there is the urge to borrow to add to the investment pool..

[libert19]

This is not always true; I sold my airdrop of $TIA and $UNI early, but they both made ATH of 7x after, while for $ARB you are right, the moment it got listed it had a pump to around $7 but suffered huge dump after, and we are yet to see it reach same peak again.

What I mean to say is, we can't predict for sure whether one should sell early or sell later.

<cut>

By effectively managing their portfolios, hunters can find ways to maintain an appropriate allocation of assets in crypto. For example, if a hunter wants to hold 50% of their assets in crypto, they could sell 50% of their reward tokens for USDT and only hold the remaining 50%. This could help them secure profits while still having the opportunity to increase their wealth through future token price appreciation.

It took me a good time to figure out what you just mentioned, I have only recently started to hold portion of holding, and sell rest, so I feel at peace whether token prices go up or down, prior it used to be either all sell (as in case of $TIA, and $UNI) or hold all ($ARB), and it didn't have good results.

[armanda90]

I have allocated around 50% of my assets in cryptocurrency as my passive income for trading or investing, but always spending my assets in fiat or cash to protect when emergency situation without have to sell bitcoin or altcoin assets.
I think every trader or investor have difference ways managing their assets how much percent allocated for cryptocurrency and how much left saving in the bank.
Saving all assets in the cash or fiat not really helpful behind inflation values year by year and allocated few percent for cryptocurrency investment help us get increasing our assets and protect from inflation values.