Signature campaigns & forum earning discussion thread.

[notblox1]

What do you guys think is the best way for managers to pay weekly signature campaigns when bitcoin fees are so high?

Yup, mixers simply don't have anywhere else to go. The only other alternatives are ads on crypto-related sites, but I think signatures work better.

Are you sure there are no other forums or places they can go to advertise their services?

I have one crazy idea to get altcoinstalk forum more popular, by creating promotional campaign in bitcointalk forum 
I dont know if admin is interested in doing that, but they can create signatures and start with their accounts.

[electronicash]

^ what about the russian no link to CT?
its not so busy but i found users here that are also there. they use to be promoting in BTT but since its related to yobit, its been frowned upon. i thin the forum is busy still. i'm just not aware how things work there. mixers has to be with crypto related contents but the casino companies i think can target users in sports and casino forums, internet users are already aware cryptocurrencies, anyone who have been making transactions online knows stablecoin and BTC.

[paid2]

What so you guys think is the best way for managers to pay weekly signature campaigns when bitcoin fees are so high?

If we promote a BTC service, payment should be done in BTC in my opinion. I know some people consider LTC for sig campaigns payments when fees are high,

From my side, I would prefer a monthly BTC payment instead of weekly.

[SamReomo]

If we promote a BTC service, payment should be done in BTC in my opinion. I know some people consider LTC for sig campaigns payments when fees are high,

From my side, I would prefer a monthly BTC payment instead of weekly.

I also agree with your opinion, the payments should be done in BTC instead of any other cryptocurrency because here we are promoting a service which is for Bitcoin mixing, and that's why payment of such service should also be in Bitcoin.

I also prefer monthly Bitcoin payment if fees remain high the way they are right now. Yesterday the fees were too high but today they have calmed down a little bit. However, until fees don't go down, a monthly payment in BTC would be much better.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

If we promote a BTC service, payment should be done in BTC in my opinion. I know some people consider LTC for sig campaigns payments when fees are high,

From my side, I would prefer a monthly BTC payment instead of weekly.

I also agree with your opinion, the payments should be done in BTC instead of any other cryptocurrency because here we are promoting a service which is for Bitcoin mixing, and that's why payment of such service should also be in Bitcoin.

Same. And from what I read from our manager on other occasions, payment in anything other than bitcoin is not even on the table. All the more reason because we advertise a bitcoin mixer as you both say. I would also say that if the fees remain high but not too high he will try to continue with the weekly payment. In this war of managers, in BTT some time ago with the increase of the fees some managers delayed the payments while icopress kept the weekly payments.

[notblox1]

If we promote a BTC service, payment should be done in BTC in my opinion. I know some people consider LTC for sig campaigns payments when fees are high,

From my side, I would prefer a monthly BTC payment instead of weekly.

Monthly payment in bitcoin would work better for me, but maybe this wont be the best for all campaigns and all members.
I think we should have something ready whenever situations like this with high bitcoin fees happening.
It is going to be beneficial for everyone.

[pawel7777]

Are you sure there are no other forums or places they can go to advertise their services?

Oh, I'm sure there are many, but this is the 2nd biggest crypto-forum, so if it's not big enough to be worth advertising here, then there's no point of moving to even less active places.

I have one crazy idea to get altcoinstalk forum more popular, by creating promotional campaign in bitcointalk forum 
I dont know if admin is interested in doing that, but they can create signatures and start with their accounts.

Haha, that's some outside-of-box thinking. I like the idea. They should do it even just for a laugh. They could start some low-budget campaign aimed for Senior members or below who can't find a place in any other campaign and just run it for a month or so and see if there's any effect.
And, to be fair, if they approached it seriously and hit the right tone, i.e. emphasising that a lot of banned signature campaigns have moved here and that anyone can teleport their account, that could give quite good results.

What do you guys think is the best way for managers to pay weekly signature campaigns when bitcoin fees are so high?

In exceptional circumstances, most people would probably be OK if the payment frequency was temporarily reduced or just payments delayed by a week. Those who are desperate to get their earnings on time, could ask to get paid in other crypto, either by a manager or even by other participants, who then could get their BTC payment instead.

[SamReomo]

I'm sure there are many, but this is the 2nd biggest crypto-forum, so if it's not big enough to be worth advertising here, then there's no point of moving to even less active places.

I believe you're right if they miss the 2nd most active crypto forum for advertising then what would they gain by advertising on forums where activity is far less than this forum.

The projects who are serious about their growth would first prefer Bitcointalk and after that they will consider this forum.

These two forums are far more active than other crypto forums we have on the internet, and if I'm not wrong then only on those two forums members can currently earn from signature campaigns.

[paid2]

Oh, I'm sure there are many, but this is the 2nd biggest crypto-forum, so if it's not big enough to be worth advertising here, then there's no point of moving to even less active places.

Ok but some other kind of places than crypto forums works too, for example forums or websites related to online privacy/OPSEC management, some on Tor network are very popular for example.

And there are many other way to do advertisement than forums, a simpler banner on the right static website can do miracles sometimes.

[Jokers]

Ok but some other kind of places than crypto forums works too, for example forums or websites related to online privacy/OPSEC management, some on Tor network are very popular for example.

And there are many other way to do advertisement than forums, a simpler banner on the right static website can do miracles sometimes.

When there was a discussion about the ban on mixer promoting on BTT, some mixer representatives said that BTT was a good place for them to have a platform in the open net where to communicate with their clients or potential clients and where they can solve the problems their clients can have. So it is not just about advertising, it is about a place of interaction. BTT was traditional and useful for that, AltcoinsTalks is trying to be a new place for that. Let's see what result we'll get.

[paid2]

When there was a discussion about the ban on mixer promoting on BTT, some mixer representatives said that BTT was a good place for them to have a platform in the open net where to communicate with their clients or potential clients and where they can solve the problems their clients can have. So it is not just about advertising, it is about a place of interaction. BTT was traditional and useful for that, AltcoinsTalks is trying to be a new place for that. Let's see what result we'll get.

I totally agree with you, indeed it's essential for them to be present on the clear. I myself believe in altcointalks' potential for promoting privacy oriented projects, due to the admin's flexibility and responsiveness; and I have the impression that discussions are becoming more and more numerous on the forum, so I'm confident. But my previous answer to pawel7777 was meant in the sense that we can't pretend that there aren't other forums and places for online promotion.

[dkbit98]

When there was a discussion about the ban on mixer promoting on BTT, some mixer representatives said that BTT was a good place for them to have a platform in the open net where to communicate with their clients or potential clients and where they can solve the problems their clients can have. So it is not just about advertising, it is about a place of interaction. BTT was traditional and useful for that, AltcoinsTalks is trying to be a new place for that. Let's see what result we'll get.

I think they are still testing the ''waters''.
They should first start with creating accounts here and being more active, and I don't see many of them doing this.
It's fine if campaign managers create ANN topics and do most of the things related with their service, but members always prefer to hear directly from service representatives.

[notblox1]

Oh, I'm sure there are many, but this is the 2nd biggest crypto-forum, so if it's not big enough to be worth advertising here, then there's no point of moving to even less active places.

I am sure there are big darknet forums that have some promotion campaigns.
I dont know any other active forums that are similar to bitcointalk and this forum.

Haha, that's some outside-of-box thinking. I like the idea. They should do it even just for a laugh. They could start some low-budget campaign aimed for Senior members or below who can't find a place in any other campaign and just run it for a month or so and see if there's any effect.
And, to be fair, if they approached it seriously and hit the right tone, i.e. emphasising that a lot of banned signature campaigns have moved here and that anyone can teleport their account, that could give quite good results.

It can be free for start.
Admin and other members have accounts in bitcointalk forum so they can start promotion campaign,
We are not allowed to advertise mixers there, but we can promote altcoinstalks forum with mixers.
I am expecting a bonus from campaign managers if they adopt my proposal 

[Cantsay]

Monthly payment in bitcoin would work better for me, but maybe this wont be the best for all campaigns and all members.

Even if they send it weekly we still won’t be able to receive it until there’s a drop in transaction fee so instead of allowing the payment to remain stock in mempool while not just allow campaign manager hold them and send at the end of the month. It might not be convenient for all members but thats still much better than the current situation that’s wasting sats.

I’m also in for monthly payments if the campaign manager would agree to it.

[JoyMarsha]

If we promote a BTC service, payment should be done in BTC in my opinion. I know some people consider LTC for sig campaigns payments when fees are high,

From my side, I would prefer a monthly BTC payment instead of weekly.

I don't think the majority of forum members would go with the idea since there will be some members who would like to sell some part of their bitcoin payment to cater for themselves and family.

Don't be surprised that there are members of the forum who depend solely on the weekly payments, some who don't depend on their weekly payment in bitcoin, still prefer to be paid for their work done for promoting a campaign weekly rather than monthly. All the same, the campaign managers should decide the best way to go about paying their signature participants in a way that will suit everyone, even if it is to have a delayed payment because of the high rise in bitcoin transaction fees