I would like to know your views on the acts of repression of the crypto market:
- Can crypto continue to thrive without the support of governments?
Yes.
Before the crypto community became popular and well known as a means of financial freedom, it has ever existed without the interference of the government, be it support or not. When the crypto community was still at it's very tender age, where it was mainly for fun without fund, it was gaining strength from every users of the industry. Now, it has gained full strength that people around the world, big investors and companies are now in the community. As at now, the dominance is more powerful, as the newly elected president has a full support on the community, while top countries like El Salvador, USA, Germany already have crypto currency legalized.
- Do you think governments can suppress and restrain the crypto market with their power?
Yes they can, but doesn't mean they can win. The P2P system of purchasing/exchanging crypto currency has made a gap that can't be bridged. This is a means that almost all crypto exchanges use and any crypto exchange that doesn't use this, it might find some difficulty in popularity and mass adoption. Where the power of the government will want to have a strong stand is in terms of the particular country's native currency. P2P will break the wings of that power, otherwise, internet banking is another powerful tool, that has come to stay and that is government friendly.
- If you were the head of government, would you accept or reject the crypto opportunity for your country?
I will accept the adoption of cryptocurrency. It has been a thing that the rich wants to keep their riches while the less privileged are oppressed. With crypto currency, everyone has the right to accumulate riches as possible. The one thing is to regulate it and put taxes.