What I look for when selecting signature campaign participants

[Findingnemo]

The thing is no one exactly knows how long the campaign they plan to transfer would be running. Some really do prefer to find a higher-paying campaign due to their own reasons. Personally, I don't do this as I also want to be part of a long-term campaign.

But yes, that's also a hassle for campaign managers to find a replacement participant for the campaign as they need to filter all the applying participants and find the best fit for the position.

Finding the participant to fill the open slot will not be a big task for the manager since people will be ready to rain applications even if it's one free slots and who says no to money.

But some members may tend to have it as habit of switching one from another and if they accepted this week and participant decided to switch in the next week may create bad impression and will not likely to be accepted in the future.

[yahoo62278]

The thing is no one exactly knows how long the campaign they plan to transfer would be running. Some really do prefer to find a higher-paying campaign due to their own reasons. Personally, I don't do this as I also want to be part of a long-term campaign.

But yes, that's also a hassle for campaign managers to find a replacement participant for the campaign as they need to filter all the applying participants and find the best fit for the position.

Finding the participant to fill the open slot will not be a big task for the manager since people will be ready to rain applications even if it's one free slots and who says no to money.

But some members may tend to have it as habit of switching one from another and if they accepted this week and participant decided to switch in the next week may create bad impression and will not likely to be accepted in the future.

I will not blink at a user if they switch campaigns on me once or twice as I likely am not going to notice, but when I start recognizing the name and their pattern and start looking at spreadsheet, they will definitely land on my do not hire list. If a user applies and is accepted and completes the week it's fine.

[Freemind]

Well, as you know 5$ a week extra means more in different parts of the world. $5 in the usa might buy a gallon of milk, whereas $5 in Indonesia might buy half the groceries for the week. Not exact on the numbers here, but you guys know what I mean.

Now, I get why people might wanna switch campaigns but they don't take everything into consideration when doing so. How long is the new campaig or old campaign going to last? They switch campaigns for their extra $5 and now have possibly aggravated the manager who might not take them back now or in the future. They didn't ask how long either campaign will last and now are making that extra $5 for 1 week and that campaign ends. So they went from say $50 guaranteed for the next 3 months to $55 for 1 whole week. They just lost themselves $605.

It's better to just stay put unless you know the campaign you are currently in is ending IMO.

That's precisely what I'm referring to. To the “loyalty” of the user in whom the bounty manager has trusted to give him a chance. I understand that in some countries around the world $5 may be an improvement, but as you say, a bounty manager may not accept the same user moving from one signature to another, and do not want to accept that user in the future, something I've seen happen elsewhere. Personally, I prefer to stick with a signature campaign that I know will last a long time and that values ​​the most veteran users, I think it is a plus point for both parties.

Here are some things that work for a Signature Campaign Participant's shifting from one campaign to another. Like some shift themselves one to another campaign cause not only the higher payrate also how lasting the campaign and also how is the project. Obviously, everyone wants to wear long-term and well-reputed projects as their signature. But I also don't like those who constantly transfer from one campaign to another campaign after seeing some higher payrate. But I also think that they have the freedom to shift from one campaign to another whenever they want. But I think taking leave during a running week is annoying for the campaign manager.

Of course, each user has the freedom to decide, I have never said otherwise, what I am saying is that personally, it is something I would never do, since that loyalty to which I refer always travels in both directions.

[bitterguy28]

Now, I get why people might wanna switch campaigns but they don't take everything into consideration when doing so. How long is the new campaig or old campaign going to last? They switch campaigns for their extra $5 and now have possibly aggravated the manager who might not take them back now or in the future. They didn't ask how long either campaign will last and now are making that extra $5 for 1 week and that campaign ends. So they went from say $50 guaranteed for the next 3 months to $55 for 1 whole week. They just lost themselves $605.

It's better to just stay put unless you know the campaign you are currently in is ending IMO.

Exactly, being in a campaign that runs for years is better than a campaign that offers 10 or 20 bucks extra but only lasts for a couple of weeks.

As you said if they consider everything they might lose because of the switch.

That makes me to be in a campaign that runs in the long run as well as I also look at other factors that I really like the product which I promote and it comes under my interests such that.

This is a normal attitude specially in BTT when there are names that I am familiar with that constantly changing campaigns depending in the amount of weekly payments , some of them are even popular account that shows no loyalty in the company but instead loyal  in the higher payments.
though they are being constantly accepted in every campaign because of their popularity and of course their name value 

[Fivestar4everMVP]

The thing is no one exactly knows how long the campaign they plan to transfer would be running. Some really do prefer to find a higher-paying campaign due to their own reasons. Personally, I don't do this as I also want to be part of a long-term campaign.

But yes, that's also a hassle for campaign managers to find a replacement participant for the campaign as they need to filter all the applying participants and find the best fit for the position.

Finding the participant to fill the open slot will not be a big task for the manager since people will be ready to rain applications even if it's one free slots and who says no to money.

You are right and I completely agree with you, from my personally observations, for the campaign managers to find a replacement for a user or some users who left the campaign and created open slot(s) isn't always that much of a hassle compared to when the campaign starts newly and the manager have to select the best participants for the campaign, I personally believe that to fill an or open slots, the manager already knows who and who to accept their application even before he or she declares the campaign open to accepting new applicant(s).

But some members may tend to have it as habit of switching one from another and if they accepted this week and participant decided to switch in the next week may create bad impression and will not likely to be accepted in the future.

Well, also very correct, some users have that habit of shifting from one campaign to another which most of the time is either..
1. For a higher paying campaign.
2. Or for a campaign where they find the campaign requirement more comfortable and convinient for them.
3. Or just for fun.

As in number 3, some users switch between campaigns just for fun, but participants only do this when there is an abundance of campaigns with open slots on the forum, not when the forum is running shot of campaigns with open slots.

[Igebotz]

As in number 3, some users switch between campaigns just for fun, but participants only do this when there is an abundance of campaigns with open slots on the forum, not when the forum is running shot of campaigns with open slots.

I will never work for managers who tells me where to post, what to post, how many posts per day, X amount of posts to get paid, and when to depart. Lol

Nobody says no to a bigger bag - I've always worked with managers who appreciate my ideals and values, and I reserve the rights to leave any project if I see strong reasons to do so (financially or in terms of posts), but I will never switch to a campaign that pays $10-20 more. I witnessed several members switch from one campaign to another for $5-10 extra. That is ridiculous. Where is the value?

[SamReomo]

I will never work for managers who tells me where to post, what to post, how many posts per day, X amount of posts to get paid, and when to depart. Lol

That's the sheriffs style while most members aren't sheriffs they're just ordinary members and thus they follow the rules and demands of a campaign manger without any question. And, to be honest, the campaign managers we have on this forum are all professional managers and they know how to promote platforms properly and at the same time they understand that how to treat the members that are in their campaigns.

[Igebotz]

I will never work for managers who tells me where to post, what to post, how many posts per day, X amount of posts to get paid, and when to depart. Lol

That's the sheriffs style while most members aren't sheriffs they're just ordinary members and thus they follow the rules and demands of a campaign manger without any question. And, to be honest, the campaign managers we have on this forum are all professional managers and they know how to promote platforms properly and at the same time they understand that how to treat the members that are in their campaigns.

Campaign rules are simple: no spam, no alts... And all that, but mandating someone to post specific numbers on a specific board is "control" rather than rules.

If a manager wants his client's project to be noticed only on the Bitcoin discussion board, he should hire regular posters there; if you want gambling posters, hire individuals from that board as well.  Pushing usesr to unfamiliar board is what causes spams.

Everyone can't be the Sherrif but we all have a role to play. 

[SamReomo]

If a manager wants his client's project to be noticed only on the Bitcoin discussion board, he should hire regular posters there; if you want gambling posters, hire individuals from that board as well.  Pushing usesr to unfamiliar board is what causes spams.

That's very true, I believe it's not useful to force users to post on only a few specific boards as most users feel uncomfortable with such approach.

However, there's nothing wrong if a manager suggest users to stop positing in the boards which aren't helpful for promotional activities of a platform.

I believe a manager should speculate the previous posts of a member and after reading a few posts of that member then a manager should choose such a member in their campaign.

Everyone can't be the Sherrif but we all have a role to play. 

Yep, that's very true, everyone should play their role but the sheriff is the only one in my eyes who only Igebotz.   

[notblox1]

I will never work for managers who tells me where to post, what to post, how many posts per day, X amount of posts to get paid, and when to depart. Lol

Good that we can agree about this.
I wont blindly obey any campaign managers, and if I dont like something I would just leave the campaign.
No hard feelings for anyone.

Nobody says no to a bigger bag - I've always worked with managers who appreciate my ideals and values, and I reserve the rights to leave any project if I see strong reasons to do so (financially or in terms of posts), but I will never switch to a campaign that pays $10-20 more. I witnessed several members switch from one campaign to another for $5-10 extra. That is ridiculous. Where is the value?

I think you learned your lesson very well when you abandoned Livecasino campaign for higher reward in different campaign.
But you returned after small excursion just like me