What are the Criteria to Participate in Campaign?

[Dzwaafu11]

Therefore, please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaigs and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread.  And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.

Thanks for your friendly responses.

I have not seen any campaign that put karma as part of the requirement before applying for a signature campaign. However, the admin knows why he is the only one who set it this way. I think the requirement for a signature campaign has been active. Some people only come here once in a while, so they can’t get a signature campaign because they are not active that much, so this type of person may find it hard to get accepted.

However, I don’t think the admin or any moderator will know the criteria for the signature campaign here because they are not the managers. I think the campaign rules and requirements are set by the managers, not admins or any moderators. 

[Freemind]

I have not seen any campaign that put karma as part of the requirement before applying for a signature campaign. However, the admin knows why he is the only one who set it this way. I think the requirement for a signature campaign has been active. Some people only come here once in a while, so they can’t get a signature campaign because they are not active that much, so this type of person may find it hard to get accepted.

However, I don’t think the admin or any moderator will know the criteria for the signature campaign here because they are not the managers. I think the campaign rules and requirements are set by the managers, not admins or any moderators.

The fact that signature campaign managers do not talk about Karma to accept any user in their campaigns does not mean that it is not something they take into account when selecting participants. I can't speak for the admin or the other moderators, but something tells me that if you make a list of users who apply for a campaign, it is very likely that some have more Karma than other users who have not been selected, although of course there are other factors.

A user's activity on the forum is important, but it is not everything. Karma will be something that will become more and more important, especially seeing the number of campaigns and users that the forum is beginning to have.

[Z-tight]

But karma was not part of the selection and that was why many people who were teleported to this forum was accepted in campaign so why the sudden change?

You know that each campaign manager will have their own individual standard and criteria, it is not a general thing. Managers may look at karma, but i am sure that it cannot be all they look at, and if the account is newly teleported, they may not look at karma for such accounts. I believe as a forum member, we don't have to worry about any criteria and just make good posts and join quality discussions.

[Freemind]

As a recent example, anyone can visit the Telegram group of a manager who did not want to admit a user to a signature campaign for having the "Regrets" badge.

As I have always said when we talk about this topic, each manager has their own way of working and logically those ways of working are not written nor is it something that all managers should do.

[Doan9269]

I think some campaign managers may want to consider the use of karma in their criterial for selection just as merit is being used on other platform, karma is just to show how someone have been consistent about his posting and how often he receives the required karma from doing so, which is a proof that the user is a quality poster, but as for the teleported accounts, i thing that the campaign mangers may also have to consider their active rank and reputation from the other forum in judging as some may just have teleported their own account and yet to build up karma or trust here.

[armanda90]

You know that each campaign manager will have their own individual standard and criteria, it is not a general thing. Managers may look at karma, but i am sure that it cannot be all they look at, and if the account is newly teleported, they may not look at karma for such accounts. I believe as a forum member, we don't have to worry about any criteria and just make good posts and join quality discussions.

Each manager have difference criteria about acceptable participants for their signature service campaign, including how many karma points receiving until common rule about high post qualities until habit sub board qualities. I don't think any problem about teleported account or not behind some signature service manager are teleported user and they know well about the participants because have working each other at Bitcointalk forum.
Just increasing good post qualities and looking the current acceptable participants which one board are their post habit to get large chance qualify or accepting by bounty campaign manager when have slot campaign.

[Asiska02]

We have discussed a lot from out of content and let us come back to main cause of the discussion. And what do you think the future of the forum will be concerning the criteria for joining campaign? Because it is obvious now that karma has already been chosen and the rank is all the same. Now apart from karma and rank, is there any other criteria needed to join campaign? Okay let's include good or quality posters. But karma was not part of the selection and that was why many people who were teleported to this forum was accepted in campaign so why the sudden change?

I will only answer this base on what I think and how maybe it is about the issue of karma and campaigns. Firstly, karma can be given by anyone and that makes it easily accessible to anyone to give anybody they wish to. Using karma as criteria to get into campaigns at this point might be misused as members will only focus on how to give karma to an account without minding the quality of the post the account creates in the forum.

Secondly, since it’s just like a like and dislike button in the forum, it does not really make it a big deal to use it as criteria for choosing one into a campaign because not everyone will feel the need to always click on that button to give the karma even when they like the content of the post.

The managers knows best what they look into before accepting members into their campaign and I thinks that can only be known to them and may differ for different managers and what they really want from their participants in the campaign.

[Agbe]

Ikarma can be given by anyone and that makes it easily accessible to anyone to give anybody they wish to.

I think that is not... Karma can be send only from Sr. Member and not from anyone  below Sr. Member. And it can be given to someone with differently either the person behaviour is good and also to a quality post. And even though the person post qualitatively and the behaviour is bad, he would not received +karma and instead, it is only -Karma will be in his account or profile. And your second part, karma was not part of the criteria to rank up a user in the forum but your activities.

[UNIVERSE]

I have not seen any campaign that put karma as part of the requirement before applying for a signature campaign.

You are right. Bounty managers didn't put the karma requirements on campaign rules. But it doesn't mean the bounty managers didn't consider the number of karma for the acceptance of the participants. I guess the number of karma can be another consideration to accept a certain member in this forum. So far, I only see Icopress who counts the change of karma in the spreadsheet. This indicates BM Icopress cares with the number of karma.

However, the admin knows why he is the only one who set it this way.

Of course, Admin knows it very well.

However, I don’t think the admin or any moderator will know the criteria for the signature campaign here because they are not the managers. I think the campaign rules and requirements are set by the managers, not admins or any moderators.

The criteria of signature campaign is determined by the bounty managers. Admin and moderators have nothing to do with the criteria of signature campaigns. So if there are people who want to give suggestions about the criteria, they should talk to the bounty managers. But we must know that bounty managers have the right to determine any criteria in their campaigns.

[armanda90]

I think that is not... Karma can be send only from Sr. Member and not from anyone  below Sr. Member. And it can be given to someone with differently either the person behaviour is good and also to a quality post. And even though the person post qualitatively and the behaviour is bad, he would not received +karma and instead, it is only -Karma will be in his account or profile. And your second part, karma was not part of the criteria to rank up a user in the forum but your activities.

Karma could be given to every one just have limitation each 24 hours have three opportunity for sending karma to the other, but seems get privacy when sending karma point to the other user because only admin have controlling and know well with some one active sending karma or which one user most ever receiving karma.
Karma could be one valuable side for bounty campaign manager to priority for their campaign participants, inside have good qualities post will make special for some one easily get criteria from bounty campaign manager approving in their campaign then other user have good post only but less karma points.

[Agbe]

I think that is not... Karma can be send only from Sr. Member and not from anyone  below Sr. Member. And it can be given to someone with differently either the person behaviour is good and also to a quality post. And even though the person post qualitatively and the behaviour is bad, he would not received +karma and instead, it is only -Karma will be in his account or profile. And your second part, karma was not part of the criteria to rank up a user in the forum but your activities.

Karma could be given to every one just have limitation each 24 hours have three opportunity for sending karma to the other, but seems get privacy when sending karma point to the other user because only admin have controlling and know well with some one active sending karma or which one user most ever receiving karma.
Karma could be one valuable side for bounty campaign manager to priority for their campaign participants, inside have good qualities post will make special for some one easily get criteria from bounty campaign manager approving in their campaign then other user have good post only but less karma points.

Yes but not everyone can give karma.  And that was what I was saying. And I don't think it is up to 24hours but it is 10 hours. And I just did a practical of it and this the result.

So in the 24hours period, you can give 2 karma to post that is quality enough. And not 3 karma because 10+10=20 reminder 4 and within this 4 hours interval, you can't send karma until the 10 hours complete. And karma can be given to a good behaviour user as I did just now to a local board which I don't know the language but because of the way the user behave, I say his name and others and I gave them karma.

[Freemind]

I think that will doused the tensions the of users in the forum concerning +Karma and -Karma. And karma is going to be very useful in the forum to join campaign. Some managers has already implemented. There is another thing the admin needs to work in the forum is the numerous boards in the forum and he needs to merge some of the boards to one.

It is normal for many users to feel this tension. But everyone must understand that Karma is not everything in the forum. We all make mistakes, we all use words that sometimes may not be the most correct, we all have bad days, but losing Karma is not the end of the world, we can always recover it by contributing useful and positive things to the forum.

It is possible that one day managers will "require" a minimum amount of positive Karma to participate in campaigns, in the same way that some use the forum's quality bar to accept users or not. The best and simplest thing about all this is that if a user does not violate the forum rules and makes quality contributions with good posts, there will never be any problem.

[bayu7adi]

Therefore, please admin and any other staff, or moderators should tell me if karma is one of criteria for participating in bounty or Signature Campaigs and there thread clearly stated that I have not seen then please. I will like to read the thread.  And I will also like to know the criteria to participate in signature campaigns that the forum spelled out.

In short, all participant criteria related to bounty, airdrop or campaign are set by the manager.. while the admin and moderator are to set permission for the procurement... the admin will prohibit the campaign personally through communication between the manager and admin... and the mechanism for accepting participants is based on the absolute decision of the manager....

Please note that the character of each manager is different... this usually also adjusts to the bounty, airdrop or campaign that he/she is running... the criteria can vary, and it also includes karma... some consider karma as an entry requirement, some do not consider it.... but now, the measuring tool in this forum regarding user quality is karma and badges... so it is natural that managers often see participants who are worthy or not to join their campaign based on these parameters.

[bounceback]

Please note that the character of each manager is different... this usually also adjusts to the bounty, airdrop or campaign that he/she is running... the criteria can vary, and it also includes karma... some consider karma as an entry requirement, some do not consider it.... but now, the measuring tool in this forum regarding user quality is karma and badges... so it is natural that managers often see participants who are worthy or not to join their campaign based on these parameters.

Right, every bounty campaign manager have difference character for recruiting the user in their campaign and not all manager have the same rule when approving the participants exactly in signature campaign service.
Some bounties campaign manager looks easily approving the user without giving many regulation regarding have good qualities posit and their post habit.
In other side, have bounty campaign manager have completed regulation from karma points must increasing every week and they are regulated for user must earn minimum 10 karma points such as in bitcontalk forum.

[Freemind]

~snip~
And your second part, karma was not part of the criteria to rank up a user in the forum but your activities.

This has been the case since the beginning of the forum. But it is something that will change in the future (there is no approximate date for that update yet) and positive karma will become a necessary part of reaching new ranks. This new rule would only affect the lowest ranks, to somehow avoid spam and abuse.

More information about the suggestion that was made is available in this thread: Karma 0 = your rank will go up.