Should we limit members in one campaign?

[hair]

With limited numbers of participants, bounty manager can assure the quality of the participants.  He can easily identify the spammers, and low quality participants and kick them out of the campaign.  The project will have a good impressions since bounty hunters are doing a quality job thus a possible more investors getting interested in participating in that project.

Yeah. This is also effective for selecting participants who have high loyalty and honesty in working on the bounty task. I think we want all of us to get profit.

[Arrrvin]

Do you want centralisation or decentralisation? Limiting the number of participants means centralisation. The idea of decentralisation in this matter means that you let the market self-regulate the amount of participants. The more participants a bounty attracts the less incentive there will be for new ones to participate. I personally have a neutral stance in this by the way. Different projects set different rules. Some projects dissapoint me and some positively surprise me.

[EAA-ALLAH]

Every campaign we get maximum tokens which not require minimum gas fees and withdraw fees. So limited participants obviously need.

[Rain075]

I think only social media campaigns participants should limit.

[hair]

I think only social media campaigns participants should limit.

It sounds good. it will give lots of rewards for champaign social media.

[Salman Hasan]

Its an interesting question.. I think it shouldn't be limited but can see the benefits of it being limited.  I'll have to think on this subject over a couple of days and see if  I can brainstorm some pluses or minuses to this and will post more if I can think of anything... really like the proposed question though.

[Btceth01]

I request every bounty manager, they should limit the participants because we don't get nothing from bounty campaign.

[Proton]

I request every bounty manager, they should limit the participants because we don't get nothing from bounty campaign.

The bounty campaign manager does not have the authority to decide whether to limit the number of participants in signature and other campaigns. Such a decision can only be made by the ICO project team, and they are interested in the fact that the largest number of participants advertise their project.

[Fawpac2]

It should limit to join within a week after bounty campaign launched. Or a, certain number of participants join the campaign.

[LifeOK]

Absolutely, limitation of participants in any campaign not only attract bounty hunters but also there is chance get a decent amount as reward. But, nowadays bounty came to end as exit scam so bounty manger didn't care this at all. But, this things must be changed.

[ranaprime]

I think so in recent bounty campaigns there are so many participants join in bounty campaign especially Facebook Twitter. Here if the manager make shortlist then it will better and participants get some rewards and also be care full in his/her work.

[hair]

I think so in recent bounty campaigns there are so many participants join in bounty campaign especially Facebook Twitter.

very profitable is a twitter campaign rather than a facebook campaign. If we don't have many followers on twitter we will get few stakes. What should really be considered is the Facebook campaign because on average many people have 5000 friends

[Black ID]

I think it is a good idea to limit the number of participants in a bounty. Because it is a good bounty, it is certain that the participants will be very many. And this makes the distribution of prizes we get very little because they are divided equally according to rank.

[Mrkadir85]

It's good disition for social media Facebook linkedin Twitter etc bounty campaign  . Limiting perticipets are goods for bounty hunter . So that all the perticipets get good rewards.

[Rain075]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

Yes, of course I agree with you. Maybe you have a certain limit.