Should we limit members in one campaign?

[Papusha20]

Obviously we should limit bounty campaign participants because we get a little bit amount of assets after finishing campaign.

[Rakin343]

A place should be reserved for everyone.  Twitter, Facebook, all social media, it is vital to limit participation in all these campaigns.

[Coin63@]

A place should be reserved for everyone.  Twitter, Facebook, all social media, it is vital to limit participation in all these campaigns.

I think it is very crucial decision because everyone wants to earn from bounty campaigns but I think only first week Participant can choose for next week.

[Quantum X]

Actually others are already doing it to make sure their participants will get a satisfying payment. But still every bounty hunter have their own rules to follow so this is not in our decision.

[Rubel007]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

I think it should be limited. Otherwise participant will not get any profit by doing bounty campaign.

[hair]

I think it should be limited. Otherwise participant will not get any profit by doing bounty campaign.

With a small allocation of rewards, limited participants are very profitable, especially social media bounties

[Absolute]

We have no control over this matter since we are just bounty hunters but still this is good enough as long as you will receive the payment of your work compare to participating in a a scam project which is just eaten your time and effort and leave you with disappointment.

[alltalk]

Some bounty managers have done it, they decided to limit the number of participants to make the payment in a good amount. They just choose the best participants to join and eliminate the remaining applicants. I've experienced it many times, for the example the signature campaign of Ludena and Free Ton. Well, this way makes the participants got a better payment but only a few people can join it.

[Gabby711]

This is a very interesting question but I think that limiting the number of participants in a particular campaign depends because there are some campaigns whose return varies based on the number of members participating.

[Ronald]

I think if the budget limited or less then definitely limit is must to do. Other wise the the projects work will not be successful by the hunters. They will not serious.

[iloveyobit]

actually it depends on your budget , if you are planing to put lot of money on that compaign making it limit wont help your project , but if you are focusing on the quality and not the quantity you should limit the number of the participating.

[Gostudio]

In depends on the particular campaign. There are some campaign that needs more participants. And there are some campaign that they limit the participants, so it depends on the specific campaign. Well infact the author or organizer of the campaign itself already know what will happen to the campaign.

[Maynul96]

This is really Very good thinking and Good Question.  We know that on this time have mane bounty hunter and Spammer on the market. Also on this time 80% project is Scam and Failed.  And Some projet is Successful but their Pool is Very low and for this reason we all get a very Low amount payment from our Hardworking.             

[bitbit97]

I dont think that there should a limit of members in one campaign, because projects goal is to get maximum response from bounty campaign.

I under why hunters want to have a limit, to earn more. But to increase their earnins, they can participate in more than 1 campaign. While projects budget is not unlimited and they cant run lots of campaigns simulteniously and spend a lot.

[Pluto25]

I think it should be limited. Otherwise participant will not get any profit by doing bounty campaign.

With a small allocation of rewards, limited participants are very profitable, especially social media bounties

Yes sir after completing any projects,we don't get any amounts which gives us big amounts of money. So participants should limit in any campaign.