Should we limit members in one campaign?

[Kinal]

In my opinion, the restrictions will harm the project. The more people will be involved in the project, the more people can learn about it, believe and take part. maybe I'm wrong.

[natmuller68]

In my opinion, the restrictions will harm the project. The more people will be involved in the project, the more people can learn about it, believe and take part. maybe I'm wrong.

No the restriction will not harm the project because the quality of post wil be a lot better, yes more people are invested in the project but not seriously or a little. With restricted people they can represant the project with their method.

[Icon]

If we limit the number, it will only be to the advantage of the bounty hunters but it will be a disadvantage to the project since it cant reach out to more people

[divine75]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

Definetly thats should bounty manager doing in order  to distribute the bounty fairly and equaly according to its ranks,because there are times thats because  of so many participant the value of those amount thats recieved by each member will become small and we can recieved only a small portion of bounty token,while in other hand if we limits those participants in bounty campaign we become greedy to our own neccesity,so thats why the decision about this coming from the bounty manager either he limits the participation or not.

[Yahud]

Everything is good and bad. But I agree if it is not limited because then there may be a good project so many people can be helped

[korkorjkk]

I think limiting members in one campaign will go a lonv way to improve the tokens obtained by a specific member in the campaign. It will also not affect the members so much if the bounty is prolonged.

[dominoes]

Hi,

i just want to say something more, check this bounty https://www.altcoinstalks.com/index.php?topic=33209.0,

they have limited members in their campaign signature so the rait/paid in tokens is more higger.

Thanks for highlighting my bounty campaign. And yes, you are right, i am limiting the number of participants so that all the signature participants are able to get good rewards.

Limiting the participants is fair enough to received fair reward at the end from lower rank to higher rank the distribution seems equal. Nice way of showing the understanding of bounty manager. Thanks

[trackermoney]

not necessarily, because I think for members of the campaign do not need to be limited so that more members then the work will be more light.

[sprewel]

Hello all! Well it's will be my first post on AltcoinsTalks.
About bountys. I think Social Media bounty campaigns MUST BE limited. Specially Facebook and Twitter. So many people want to join,so mayn people are joining, but staying inactive trough all campaig.If you check spreadsheets later, soma of these people are inactive...
But ok lets talk about limits. Limits must be , how i said speciall on FB and Twitter. Bounters getting just ridiculuos amounts of tokens for these campaigs. It's  like 3-5$ for 2 months work.
So my opinion FB and Twitter bounty campaigns must be limited ! And if some guy registered , but is inactive after first or second week, he must be deleted,and should'nt get any reward for this.

[Infinite]

This is a concern of bounty manager and already practice by some of them due to the continues growth of bounty participants.

[Alpha]

Due to unstoppable bounty hunters to join the campaign that makes the members tremendously. actually it is not the concern of bounty hunters to limit the participants but it is the responsibility of the manager or maybe it is depends on the planning system.

[-Lazy-]

it depends on the manager and devs... i would agree to establish a limit but also understand if they want as many people as possible promoting their project... concerning bounty hunters they just have to do the math and check if it is worth it or not, instead of blindly joining every bounty in sight

Well, as a bounty hunters or a participant on a specific campaign project, limited participants means big stakes or reward to earned. As you said mate, hired bounty managers didnt put limited slots because the devs want it and yeah your right, they want too many participants to promote their project.

[billy.ryoko]

I like to join the bounty campaign limited the participants or fixed amount reward, if not you will get few amounts of token after the campaign finished due to the so many participants or multi-account. 

[natmuller68]

Due to unstoppable bounty hunters to join the campaign that makes the members tremendously. actually it is not the concern of bounty hunters to limit the participants but it is the responsibility of the manager or maybe it is depends on the planning system.

I think it depend on the planning system in correlation with the bounty manager. The quality of posts must be better than a campaign where there's no limited members. And it's easier for the bounty manager to check and valid all the posts.

[Dreamer02]

This is bounty managers decision but for me, yes i agree to give limit on particular campaign, but we are bounty hunters we're here because for some practical reasons to earn, we must share the blessings to others because we have same purpose for being here in this crypto world. On selfish thought limited is the best option but we have to consider others also looking the opportunity to join and earn.